Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
User avatar
bucs90
Level2
Level2
Posts: 973
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:43 pm
I am a fan of: Charleston Southern

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by bucs90 »

In ours it's Liberty (best) vs Charleston Southern (worst). Libertys rivals many FBS schools. CSUs...aren't as good as most big high schools.

And....CSU is conference champion. Go figure.
[img] http://www.csusports.com/sports/fball/2 ... 325380900/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;[img]
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by Grizalltheway »

New video board is going up, and construction on the Champions Center is underway.

Image
GAD_SU
Level1
Level1
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:39 pm
I am a fan of: Southern U.
A.K.A.: GAD

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by GAD_SU »

GAD_SU wrote:*UPDATE*
Alcorn is installing a new video score board
Southern is adding Field Turf
Prairie View will be opening its new stadium Labor Day Weekend
Alcorn is also adding a video theater room
GAD_SU
Level1
Level1
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:39 pm
I am a fan of: Southern U.
A.K.A.: GAD

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by GAD_SU »

GAD_SU
Level1
Level1
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:39 pm
I am a fan of: Southern U.
A.K.A.: GAD

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by GAD_SU »

GAD_SU
Level1
Level1
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:39 pm
I am a fan of: Southern U.
A.K.A.: GAD

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by GAD_SU »

Finished product at Southern U
https://vimeo.com/178613972
User avatar
Thumper 76
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:33 pm
I am a fan of: South Dakota State
Location: Where ever I happen to be

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by Thumper 76 »

Well SDSU is out of the cellar for facilities in the Valley. Almost finished up!

https://youtu.be/-f2eEE5omWc

Video gives a great view of the different parts of the stadium.

ImageImageImage
Image
Please don't tell Obama what comes after a Trillion.
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by Grizalltheway »

New turf just about done

Image
GAD_SU
Level1
Level1
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:39 pm
I am a fan of: Southern U.
A.K.A.: GAD

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by GAD_SU »

Thumper 76 wrote:Well SDSU is out of the cellar for facilities in the Valley. Almost finished up!

https://youtu.be/-f2eEE5omWc

Video gives a great view of the different parts of the stadium.

ImageImageImage
one of the best in FCS :thumb:
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3865
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by BlackFalkin »

GAD_SU wrote:
Thumper 76 wrote:Well SDSU is out of the cellar for facilities in the Valley. Almost finished up!

https://youtu.be/-f2eEE5omWc

Video gives a great view of the different parts of the stadium.

ImageImageImage
one of the best in FCS :thumb:

It's really not though. It's 19k but it's the most unimpressive 19k you'll ever see! Smh. GO BIG or go home.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3865
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by BlackFalkin »

GAD_SU wrote:Finished product at Southern U
https://vimeo.com/178613972

They need to scrap those seats past the Endzone, lower the field, then build seats closer to the action. Venues like these always have poor attendance.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3865
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by BlackFalkin »

Image

Image

Image


The MAC was still a great venue. All I'm saying is it's almost ALWAYS better to expand and/or renovate than start anew.

((By the way SDSU & SIU, McAndrew Stadium capacity = 17k, Saluki Stadium = 15k)) You should've taken the Montana state route.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
GAD_SU
Level1
Level1
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:39 pm
I am a fan of: Southern U.
A.K.A.: GAD

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by GAD_SU »

BlackFalkin wrote:
GAD_SU wrote:Finished product at Southern U
https://vimeo.com/178613972

They need to scrap those seats past the Endzone, lower the field, then build seats closer to the action. Venues like these always have poor attendance.
Everyone of those seats has been filled, if you look at the video that body of water is the Mississippi River if we lower the field when the river rises the stadium would fill with water. Poor attendance? There might be two teams currently in FCS that have finished #1 in attendance more times than Southern
User avatar
Thumper 76
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:33 pm
I am a fan of: South Dakota State
Location: Where ever I happen to be

Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by Thumper 76 »

BlackFalkin wrote:Image

Image

Image


The MAC was still a great venue. All I'm saying is it's almost ALWAYS better to expand and/or renovate than start anew.

((By the way SDSU & SIU, McAndrew Stadium capacity = 17k, Saluki Stadium = 15k)) You should've taken the Montana state route.
What does McAndrew Stadium have to do with SDSU?

Also, you're arguing that a stadium with a track is better than one without one. I'm sorry, but you just lost any argument you've ever made about stadiums by doing that.
Image
Please don't tell Obama what comes after a Trillion.
GAD_SU
Level1
Level1
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:39 pm
I am a fan of: Southern U.
A.K.A.: GAD

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by GAD_SU »

Jackson State has new facilities
phpBB [video]
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45613
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by dbackjon »

NAU unveiled new $47 Million Student-Athlete facility

https://www.athleticbusiness.com/facili ... nce-center

A large portion of the new center is the 11,500-square-foot Jennifer Marie Wilson Strength and Conditioning Center, which includes warm-up turf, plyometric space and 21 Sorinex weight rack stations.

A one-of-a-kind lab space — the Sims-Treharne Collaborative Research Lab — is a collaboration between NAU Athletics and the Health and Human Services Department that allows for real time research between faculty, students and student-athletes.
:thumb:
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3865
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by BlackFalkin »

dbackjon wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 3:25 pm NAU unveiled new $47 Million Student-Athlete facility

https://www.athleticbusiness.com/facili ... nce-center

A large portion of the new center is the 11,500-square-foot Jennifer Marie Wilson Strength and Conditioning Center, which includes warm-up turf, plyometric space and 21 Sorinex weight rack stations.

A one-of-a-kind lab space — the Sims-Treharne Collaborative Research Lab — is a collaboration between NAU Athletics and the Health and Human Services Department that allows for real time research between faculty, students and student-athletes.
:clap:
Well done. If NAU can get some decent coaching and recruits, we could see NAU snatch a few Big Sky titles.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
GAD_SU
Level1
Level1
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:39 pm
I am a fan of: Southern U.
A.K.A.: GAD

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by GAD_SU »

dbackjon wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 3:25 pm NAU unveiled new $47 Million Student-Athlete facility

https://www.athleticbusiness.com/facili ... nce-center

A large portion of the new center is the 11,500-square-foot Jennifer Marie Wilson Strength and Conditioning Center, which includes warm-up turf, plyometric space and 21 Sorinex weight rack stations.

A one-of-a-kind lab space — the Sims-Treharne Collaborative Research Lab — is a collaboration between NAU Athletics and the Health and Human Services Department that allows for real time research between faculty, students and student-athletes.
Here is another video
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3865
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by BlackFalkin »

[media][/media]
Thumper 76 wrote: Fri Aug 19, 2016 6:11 am
BlackFalkin wrote:Image

Image

Image


The MAC was still a great venue. All I'm saying is it's almost ALWAYS better to expand and/or renovate than start anew.

((By the way SDSU & SIU, McAndrew Stadium capacity = 17k, Saluki Stadium = 15k)) You should've taken the Montana state route.
What does McAndrew Stadium have to do with SDSU?

Also, you're arguing that a stadium with a track is better than one without one. I'm sorry, but you just lost any argument you've ever made about stadiums by doing that.
Yes, renovating McAndrew would’ve been the better route, instead of building a Generic FCS Stadium. Notice anything these two have in common? They’re generic cookie cutters with little history or character.

Image
Image
Image
Image


SDSU’s looks much better because of the larger capacity & press box, but Dykhouse stadium built the main grandstand with different materials and created a better overall look. Something that looks good and new, it also doesn’t look like the rest of the seating around the field; generic and cookie cutter.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3865
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

Re: Biggest Discrepancy In Conference Facilities

Post by BlackFalkin »

Here’s another example, UC Davis’ still new stadium is nice, and is perfectly sized for FCS football. It was desperately needed, and they nailed the end zone grass berm, which almost looks like end zone seating at packed games, Davis did a great job, but……….


Image
Image

The original architecture, design, and history is completely lost by choosing that cookie cutter stadium style.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
Post Reply