When you are a cop and you accidentally shoot someone it is not customary to simply be suspended and then reinstated.Skjellyfetti wrote:Well, first of all... you should know he has a gun before opening fire, right?CAA Flagship wrote: IF he has a gun, and is not complying to the commands, why give him a chance to fire the first shot? Tasers are not as accurate and not as quick acting. I can't blame an officer for shooting first under those circumstances. I would value my life over his if I were in that situation.
And, second... the Tulsa police department has said that the officer meant to use her taser... but, used her gun instead. They aren't saying that the guy was noncompliant, and therefore justifiably shot. They weren't saying he reached into his car and the officer shot thinking he was going to pull a gun on her.
They're saying she wanted to use her taser... but, used her gun instead.
I think that helps eliminate racism as any kind of reason (though, the officer on the radio saying he "looks like a bad dude" because he's a large black man doesn't help in that regard).
If I accidentally shoot and kill someone - I'm probably going to be charged with manslaughter. Cops need to be treated the same. None of the typical: "Ooops! We'll put her on 6 months paid administrative leave!! That'll teach her!"
The dude messed up by being non-compliant. The cop messed up.... far, far worse by accidentally shooting the guy.
But, for whatever reason you don't want to admit that the cop **** up. Why is that?
Unless you are a contract employee in a union department.
You do that on my old department and you're going down.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk