Thankful for SCOTUS

Political discussions
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by 89Hen »

Jesus Christ kalm, just stop. It's gotten to the point where I'm embarrassed for you.
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69096
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by kalm »

89Hen wrote:Jesus Christ kalm, just stop. It's gotten to the point where I'm embarrassed for you.
Why? Hillary is a liberal because of a few pandering campaign promises and she has a D behind her name? :lol:

Labels are always interesting things. Some would hesitate to call GWB a conservative based on his spending, medicare part D, home ownership society, and nation building...but I digress...
Image
Image
Image
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by Ibanez »

kalm wrote:
Ibanez wrote: Center Right? There's not Center Right about Clinton; she's firmly on the Left.

I can't believe this is even up for debate.
We've been through this before...just off the top of my head and I know there are more examples...

Neo-conservative on foreign policy... :check:
Defender of Wall Street... :check:
Against legalization of weed... :check:
Believes Snowden is a traitor... :check:
Security State... :check:

Yeah...what a lib! :lol:

And yes...she's not the only one. Chuck Schumer is a Wall Street shill as well. The Democrats had to go after big money as the unions declined.

And yes...she pivoted to the left on free college education and paid lip service to a few other Bernie ideas but as we found out with Obama...most of the liberal campaign promises are "Hope" (in one hand).
Maybe we're watching the Republicans and Democrats return to their original party platforms. :coffee:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69096
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by kalm »

Ibanez wrote:
kalm wrote:
We've been through this before...just off the top of my head and I know there are more examples...

Neo-conservative on foreign policy... :check:
Defender of Wall Street... :check:
Against legalization of weed... :check:
Believes Snowden is a traitor... :check:
Security State... :check:

Yeah...what a lib! :lol:

And yes...she's not the only one. Chuck Schumer is a Wall Street shill as well. The Democrats had to go after big money as the unions declined.

And yes...she pivoted to the left on free college education and paid lip service to a few other Bernie ideas but as we found out with Obama...most of the liberal campaign promises are "Hope" (in one hand).
Maybe we're watching the Republicans and Democrats return to their original party platforms. :coffee:
:lol:

Works for JSO...
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by CID1990 »

I AM happy that Hillary won't be appointing any justices to SCOTUS. Klam's at least partially correct about her but I'm not so sure she'd appoint anything other than a "living document" activist like he husband did.

I'm also not sure that Trump will appoint someone I agree with, but I'd say it's a much better chance he'd appoint an originalist than Hillary.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote:Jesus Christ kalm, just stop. It's gotten to the point where I'm embarrassed for you.
Why? Hillary is a liberal because of a few pandering campaign promises and she has a D behind her name? :lol:

Labels are always interesting things. Some would hesitate to call GWB a conservative based on his spending, medicare part D, home ownership society, and nation building...but I digress...
She is not right of center, Bill was not right of center, his SCOTUS appointees were not right of center.

/discussion
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69096
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by kalm »

CID1990 wrote:I AM happy that Hillary won't be appointing any justices to SCOTUS. Klam's at least partially correct about her but I'm not so sure she'd appoint anything other than a "living document" activist like he husband did.

I'm also not sure that Trump will appoint someone I agree with, but I'd say it's a much better chance he'd appoint an originalist than Hillary.
That's reasonable and I agree. :thumb:
Image
Image
Image
Vidav
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 10804
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: The Russian
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by Vidav »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
Why? Hillary is a liberal because of a few pandering campaign promises and she has a D behind her name? :lol:

Labels are always interesting things. Some would hesitate to call GWB a conservative based on his spending, medicare part D, home ownership society, and nation building...but I digress...
She is not right of center, Bill was not right of center, his SCOTUS appointees were not right of center.

/discussion
No one claimed they were. :coffee:
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by Baldy »

kalm wrote:
Ibanez wrote: Center Right? There's not Center Right about Clinton; she's firmly on the Left.

I can't believe this is even up for debate.
We've been through this before...just off the top of my head and I know there are more examples...

Neo-conservative on foreign policy... :check:
Defender of Wall Street... :check:
Against legalization of weed... :check:
Believes Snowden is a traitor... :check:
Security State... :check:

Yeah...what a lib! :lol:

And yes...she's not the only one. Chuck Schumer is a Wall Street shill as well. The Democrats had to go after big money as the unions declined.

And yes...she pivoted to the left on free college education and paid lip service to a few other Bernie ideas but as we found out with Obama...most of the liberal campaign promises are "Hope" (in one hand).
:?

Hillary Clinton Was Liberal. Hillary Clinton Is Liberal.
A bunch of reporters have recently discovered a shocking truth: Hillary Clinton is liberal! (I heard a rumor that Columbo has been helping with the investigation.)

We’ve gotten this raft of “Clinton is liberal” exposés as Clinton has revved up her 2016 campaign, speaking out in support of gay marriage, a pathway to citizenship for immigrants in the U.S. illegally, and criminal justice reform. But what many of these articles miss is that Clinton has always been, by most measures, pretty far to the left. When she’s shifted positions, it has been in concert with the entire Democratic Party.

To see how these different issues fit together to form an overall political ideology, we usually use three metrics: one based on congressional voting record, one based on public statements and one based on fundraising.
Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Democrats: Mostly Liberal, Together
Among seven potential Democratic presidential contenders, Hillary Clinton is the overwhelming favorite — and the third-most liberal candidate. How the other candidates are arrayed on an ideological spectrum could make her run for the White House easier than the last time out.

In some ways, the cast of candidates for 2016 resembles the group from the 2008 race, with a field of stalwartly liberal politicians. Mrs. Clinton was slightly more liberal in 2008 than now, according to Crowdpac, which scores politicians on a left-right scale of -10 to 10. (Crowdpac bases this mainly on campaign contributions, but also on votes and speeches.) Her problem was that Barack Obama, who was further to the left of her — at -7.8 to her -6.9 — also had the donors who were to the left of her. He ran a better campaign, particularly in Iowa, and benefited from a surge in money from small-dollar donors.

This time, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (-8.2) and Bernie Sanders (-8.3), Vermont’s independent senator, are to her left. Ms. Warren has the higher fund-raising profile of the two, with a leadership PAC that raised more than $2 million during the 2014 election cycle. But she and Mrs. Clinton (and to a lesser extent Mr. Sanders) would be competing for a similar pool of donors. During her 2012 Senate race, Ms. Warren raised more than $3.4 million from individuals who also gave to Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign, Federal Election Commission data shows.
Hillary Clinton On The Issues
HARD CORE LIBERAL
Image

The Senate Votes That Divided Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a liberal Democrat on domestic matters, and Bernie Sanders is a socialist. They voted the same way 93 percent of the time in the two years they shared in the Senate.

In fact, from January 2007 to January 2009, Mrs. Clinton, representing New York, voted with Mr. Sanders about as often as she did with the like-minded Democrats Ron Wyden of Oregon and Barbara Mikulski of Maryland.
Hillary Clinton Is A Progressive Democrat, Despite What You May Have Heard
Bernie Sanders has said that Hillary Clinton is not a “true progressive” and many of his supporters seem to agree. It’s one reason that Sanders keeps performing well in primaries and caucuses, prolonging the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.

But whether that assessment of Clinton is accurate depends entirely on what it means to be a true progressive nowadays.

Does it mean voting like Sanders has, and embracing his agenda? Or does it simply mean consistently pushing for policies that would significantly advance progressive causes, like a fairer economy and a cleaner environment?

By the first definition, Clinton clearly doesn’t qualify as a progressive.

By the second, she clearly does.
kalm, Please.Stop. :dunce:

Image

:coffee:
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by 89Hen »

Vidav wrote:
89Hen wrote: She is not right of center, Bill was not right of center, his SCOTUS appointees were not right of center.

/discussion
No one claimed they were. :coffee:
:bad:
kalm wrote:Because I think Hillary is center right (similar to her husband) and would have made appointments along those lines
Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by Ivytalk »

89Hen wrote:
Vidav wrote:
No one claimed they were. :coffee:
:bad:
kalm wrote:Because I think Hillary is center right (similar to her husband) and would have made appointments along those lines
Nobody bullshyts 89Hen and gets away with it! :D
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69096
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by kalm »

Ivytalk wrote:
89Hen wrote: :bad:
Nobody bullshyts 89Hen and gets away with it! :D
Classic 89 cut and paste. :ohno:

You two know I explained that and even owned it to a certain degree.

What a pair of dicks.... :rofl:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by SDHornet »

I think the only escape route for kalm is to claim the whole thing is nuanced and then just not post in this thread again. Let's see if he takes that out from this beating...
:popcorn:
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote:
We've been through this before...just off the top of my head and I know there are more examples...

Neo-conservative on foreign policy... :check:
Defender of Wall Street... :check:
Against legalization of weed... :check:
Believes Snowden is a traitor... :check:
Security State... :check:

Yeah...what a lib! :lol:

And yes...she's not the only one. Chuck Schumer is a Wall Street shill as well. The Democrats had to go after big money as the unions declined.

And yes...she pivoted to the left on free college education and paid lip service to a few other Bernie ideas but as we found out with Obama...most of the liberal campaign promises are "Hope" (in one hand).
:?

Hillary Clinton Was Liberal. Hillary Clinton Is Liberal.
A bunch of reporters have recently discovered a shocking truth: Hillary Clinton is liberal! (I heard a rumor that Columbo has been helping with the investigation.)

We’ve gotten this raft of “Clinton is liberal” exposés as Clinton has revved up her 2016 campaign, speaking out in support of gay marriage, a pathway to citizenship for immigrants in the U.S. illegally, and criminal justice reform. But what many of these articles miss is that Clinton has always been, by most measures, pretty far to the left. When she’s shifted positions, it has been in concert with the entire Democratic Party.

To see how these different issues fit together to form an overall political ideology, we usually use three metrics: one based on congressional voting record, one based on public statements and one based on fundraising.
Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Democrats: Mostly Liberal, Together
Among seven potential Democratic presidential contenders, Hillary Clinton is the overwhelming favorite — and the third-most liberal candidate. How the other candidates are arrayed on an ideological spectrum could make her run for the White House easier than the last time out.

In some ways, the cast of candidates for 2016 resembles the group from the 2008 race, with a field of stalwartly liberal politicians. Mrs. Clinton was slightly more liberal in 2008 than now, according to Crowdpac, which scores politicians on a left-right scale of -10 to 10. (Crowdpac bases this mainly on campaign contributions, but also on votes and speeches.) Her problem was that Barack Obama, who was further to the left of her — at -7.8 to her -6.9 — also had the donors who were to the left of her. He ran a better campaign, particularly in Iowa, and benefited from a surge in money from small-dollar donors.

This time, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (-8.2) and Bernie Sanders (-8.3), Vermont’s independent senator, are to her left. Ms. Warren has the higher fund-raising profile of the two, with a leadership PAC that raised more than $2 million during the 2014 election cycle. But she and Mrs. Clinton (and to a lesser extent Mr. Sanders) would be competing for a similar pool of donors. During her 2012 Senate race, Ms. Warren raised more than $3.4 million from individuals who also gave to Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign, Federal Election Commission data shows.
Hillary Clinton On The Issues
HARD CORE LIBERAL
Image

The Senate Votes That Divided Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a liberal Democrat on domestic matters, and Bernie Sanders is a socialist. They voted the same way 93 percent of the time in the two years they shared in the Senate.

In fact, from January 2007 to January 2009, Mrs. Clinton, representing New York, voted with Mr. Sanders about as often as she did with the like-minded Democrats Ron Wyden of Oregon and Barbara Mikulski of Maryland.
Hillary Clinton Is A Progressive Democrat, Despite What You May Have Heard
Bernie Sanders has said that Hillary Clinton is not a “true progressive” and many of his supporters seem to agree. It’s one reason that Sanders keeps performing well in primaries and caucuses, prolonging the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.

But whether that assessment of Clinton is accurate depends entirely on what it means to be a true progressive nowadays.

Does it mean voting like Sanders has, and embracing his agenda? Or does it simply mean consistently pushing for policies that would significantly advance progressive causes, like a fairer economy and a cleaner environment?

By the first definition, Clinton clearly doesn’t qualify as a progressive.

By the second, she clearly does.
kalm, Please.Stop. :dunce:

Image

:coffee:
Baldy just took kalms other ball and went home..................#owned
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by Ivytalk »

kalm wrote:
Ivytalk wrote: Nobody bullshyts 89Hen and gets away with it! :D
Classic 89 cut and paste. :ohno:

You two know I explained that and even owned it to a certain degree.

What a pair of dicks.... :rofl:
"The butthurt is strong with this one!" :rofl:

Yup, "owned it" to the degree of trying to get the last word on every picayune point in this thread! :lol:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69096
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by kalm »

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote:
We've been through this before...just off the top of my head and I know there are more examples...

Neo-conservative on foreign policy... :check:
Defender of Wall Street... :check:
Against legalization of weed... :check:
Believes Snowden is a traitor... :check:
Security State... :check:

Yeah...what a lib! :lol:

And yes...she's not the only one. Chuck Schumer is a Wall Street shill as well. The Democrats had to go after big money as the unions declined.

And yes...she pivoted to the left on free college education and paid lip service to a few other Bernie ideas but as we found out with Obama...most of the liberal campaign promises are "Hope" (in one hand).
:?

Hillary Clinton Was Liberal. Hillary Clinton Is Liberal.
A bunch of reporters have recently discovered a shocking truth: Hillary Clinton is liberal! (I heard a rumor that Columbo has been helping with the investigation.)

We’ve gotten this raft of “Clinton is liberal” exposés as Clinton has revved up her 2016 campaign, speaking out in support of gay marriage, a pathway to citizenship for immigrants in the U.S. illegally, and criminal justice reform. But what many of these articles miss is that Clinton has always been, by most measures, pretty far to the left. When she’s shifted positions, it has been in concert with the entire Democratic Party.

To see how these different issues fit together to form an overall political ideology, we usually use three metrics: one based on congressional voting record, one based on public statements and one based on fundraising.
Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Democrats: Mostly Liberal, Together
Among seven potential Democratic presidential contenders, Hillary Clinton is the overwhelming favorite — and the third-most liberal candidate. How the other candidates are arrayed on an ideological spectrum could make her run for the White House easier than the last time out.

In some ways, the cast of candidates for 2016 resembles the group from the 2008 race, with a field of stalwartly liberal politicians. Mrs. Clinton was slightly more liberal in 2008 than now, according to Crowdpac, which scores politicians on a left-right scale of -10 to 10. (Crowdpac bases this mainly on campaign contributions, but also on votes and speeches.) Her problem was that Barack Obama, who was further to the left of her — at -7.8 to her -6.9 — also had the donors who were to the left of her. He ran a better campaign, particularly in Iowa, and benefited from a surge in money from small-dollar donors.

This time, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (-8.2) and Bernie Sanders (-8.3), Vermont’s independent senator, are to her left. Ms. Warren has the higher fund-raising profile of the two, with a leadership PAC that raised more than $2 million during the 2014 election cycle. But she and Mrs. Clinton (and to a lesser extent Mr. Sanders) would be competing for a similar pool of donors. During her 2012 Senate race, Ms. Warren raised more than $3.4 million from individuals who also gave to Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign, Federal Election Commission data shows.
Hillary Clinton On The Issues
HARD CORE LIBERAL
Image

The Senate Votes That Divided Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a liberal Democrat on domestic matters, and Bernie Sanders is a socialist. They voted the same way 93 percent of the time in the two years they shared in the Senate.

In fact, from January 2007 to January 2009, Mrs. Clinton, representing New York, voted with Mr. Sanders about as often as she did with the like-minded Democrats Ron Wyden of Oregon and Barbara Mikulski of Maryland.
Hillary Clinton Is A Progressive Democrat, Despite What You May Have Heard
Bernie Sanders has said that Hillary Clinton is not a “true progressive” and many of his supporters seem to agree. It’s one reason that Sanders keeps performing well in primaries and caucuses, prolonging the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.

But whether that assessment of Clinton is accurate depends entirely on what it means to be a true progressive nowadays.

Does it mean voting like Sanders has, and embracing his agenda? Or does it simply mean consistently pushing for policies that would significantly advance progressive causes, like a fairer economy and a cleaner environment?

By the first definition, Clinton clearly doesn’t qualify as a progressive.

By the second, she clearly does.
kalm, Please.Stop. :dunce:

Image

:coffee:
Finally...somebody at least makes a decent effort supported by facts. I'll look at this stiff in awhile and reply when I get chance.

Thanks, Baldy!
Image
Image
Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by Ivytalk »

kalm wrote:
Finally...somebody at least makes a decent effort supported by facts. I'll look at this stiff in awhile and reply when I get chance.

Thanks, Baldy!
While you're at it, please come up with a rational response to my analysis of the ideological composition of SCOTUS that I posted a few pages ago. :coffee:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by Ibanez »

kalm wrote:
Finally...somebody at least makes a decent effort supported by facts. I'll look at this stiff in awhile and reply when I get chance.

Thanks, Baldy!
It's nuanced.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by Baldy »

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote: Baldy just took kalms other ball and went home..................#owned
Image
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25090
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by houndawg »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
Why? Hillary is a liberal because of a few pandering campaign promises and she has a D behind her name? :lol:

Labels are always interesting things. Some would hesitate to call GWB a conservative based on his spending, medicare part D, home ownership society, and nation building...but I digress...
She is not right of center, Bill was not right of center, his SCOTUS appointees were not right of center.

/discussion
Bullshit. She's to the right of Eisenhower.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69096
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by kalm »

Ivytalk wrote:
kalm wrote:
Finally...somebody at least makes a decent effort supported by facts. I'll look at this stiff in awhile and reply when I get chance.

Thanks, Baldy!
While you're at it, please come up with a rational response to my analysis of the ideological composition of SCOTUS that I posted a few pages ago. :coffee:
I did. It went something like this...

Image
Image
Image
Image
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38528
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by CAA Flagship »

Damn. There seems to be a gluten-free bonfire going on here.
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by Ivytalk »

kalm wrote:
Ivytalk wrote: While you're at it, please come up with a rational response to my analysis of the ideological composition of SCOTUS that I posted a few pages ago. :coffee:
I did. It went something like this...

Image
Ha. Good one.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by YoUDeeMan »

Baldy wrote:
Image
That hole is 6.93 feet deep...anyone want to guess who the genius is that dug it? :suspicious:
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Thankful for SCOTUS

Post by Ivytalk »

Cluck U wrote:
Baldy wrote:
Image
That hole is 6.93 feet deep...anyone want to guess who the genius is that dug it? :suspicious:
I dunno, but he's wearing klamdiggers. :coffee:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Post Reply