Thankful for SCOTUS
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Jesus Christ kalm, just stop. It's gotten to the point where I'm embarrassed for you.

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69102
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Why? Hillary is a liberal because of a few pandering campaign promises and she has a D behind her name?89Hen wrote:Jesus Christ kalm, just stop. It's gotten to the point where I'm embarrassed for you.
Labels are always interesting things. Some would hesitate to call GWB a conservative based on his spending, medicare part D, home ownership society, and nation building...but I digress...
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Maybe we're watching the Republicans and Democrats return to their original party platforms.kalm wrote:We've been through this before...just off the top of my head and I know there are more examples...Ibanez wrote: Center Right? There's not Center Right about Clinton; she's firmly on the Left.
I can't believe this is even up for debate.
Neo-conservative on foreign policy...![]()
Defender of Wall Street...![]()
Against legalization of weed...![]()
Believes Snowden is a traitor...![]()
Security State...![]()
Yeah...what a lib!![]()
And yes...she's not the only one. Chuck Schumer is a Wall Street shill as well. The Democrats had to go after big money as the unions declined.
And yes...she pivoted to the left on free college education and paid lip service to a few other Bernie ideas but as we found out with Obama...most of the liberal campaign promises are "Hope" (in one hand).
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69102
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Ibanez wrote:Maybe we're watching the Republicans and Democrats return to their original party platforms.kalm wrote:
We've been through this before...just off the top of my head and I know there are more examples...
Neo-conservative on foreign policy...![]()
Defender of Wall Street...![]()
Against legalization of weed...![]()
Believes Snowden is a traitor...![]()
Security State...![]()
Yeah...what a lib!![]()
And yes...she's not the only one. Chuck Schumer is a Wall Street shill as well. The Democrats had to go after big money as the unions declined.
And yes...she pivoted to the left on free college education and paid lip service to a few other Bernie ideas but as we found out with Obama...most of the liberal campaign promises are "Hope" (in one hand).
Works for JSO...
- CID1990
- Level5

- Posts: 25486
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
I AM happy that Hillary won't be appointing any justices to SCOTUS. Klam's at least partially correct about her but I'm not so sure she'd appoint anything other than a "living document" activist like he husband did.
I'm also not sure that Trump will appoint someone I agree with, but I'd say it's a much better chance he'd appoint an originalist than Hillary.
I'm also not sure that Trump will appoint someone I agree with, but I'd say it's a much better chance he'd appoint an originalist than Hillary.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
She is not right of center, Bill was not right of center, his SCOTUS appointees were not right of center.kalm wrote:Why? Hillary is a liberal because of a few pandering campaign promises and she has a D behind her name?89Hen wrote:Jesus Christ kalm, just stop. It's gotten to the point where I'm embarrassed for you.![]()
Labels are always interesting things. Some would hesitate to call GWB a conservative based on his spending, medicare part D, home ownership society, and nation building...but I digress...
/discussion

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69102
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
That's reasonable and I agree.CID1990 wrote:I AM happy that Hillary won't be appointing any justices to SCOTUS. Klam's at least partially correct about her but I'm not so sure she'd appoint anything other than a "living document" activist like he husband did.
I'm also not sure that Trump will appoint someone I agree with, but I'd say it's a much better chance he'd appoint an originalist than Hillary.
-
Vidav
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 10804
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: The Russian
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
No one claimed they were.89Hen wrote:She is not right of center, Bill was not right of center, his SCOTUS appointees were not right of center.kalm wrote:
Why? Hillary is a liberal because of a few pandering campaign promises and she has a D behind her name?![]()
Labels are always interesting things. Some would hesitate to call GWB a conservative based on his spending, medicare part D, home ownership society, and nation building...but I digress...
/discussion
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
kalm wrote:We've been through this before...just off the top of my head and I know there are more examples...Ibanez wrote: Center Right? There's not Center Right about Clinton; she's firmly on the Left.
I can't believe this is even up for debate.
Neo-conservative on foreign policy...![]()
Defender of Wall Street...![]()
Against legalization of weed...![]()
Believes Snowden is a traitor...![]()
Security State...![]()
Yeah...what a lib!![]()
And yes...she's not the only one. Chuck Schumer is a Wall Street shill as well. The Democrats had to go after big money as the unions declined.
And yes...she pivoted to the left on free college education and paid lip service to a few other Bernie ideas but as we found out with Obama...most of the liberal campaign promises are "Hope" (in one hand).
Hillary Clinton Was Liberal. Hillary Clinton Is Liberal.
Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Democrats: Mostly Liberal, TogetherA bunch of reporters have recently discovered a shocking truth: Hillary Clinton is liberal! (I heard a rumor that Columbo has been helping with the investigation.)
We’ve gotten this raft of “Clinton is liberal” exposés as Clinton has revved up her 2016 campaign, speaking out in support of gay marriage, a pathway to citizenship for immigrants in the U.S. illegally, and criminal justice reform. But what many of these articles miss is that Clinton has always been, by most measures, pretty far to the left. When she’s shifted positions, it has been in concert with the entire Democratic Party.
To see how these different issues fit together to form an overall political ideology, we usually use three metrics: one based on congressional voting record, one based on public statements and one based on fundraising.
Hillary Clinton On The IssuesAmong seven potential Democratic presidential contenders, Hillary Clinton is the overwhelming favorite — and the third-most liberal candidate. How the other candidates are arrayed on an ideological spectrum could make her run for the White House easier than the last time out.
In some ways, the cast of candidates for 2016 resembles the group from the 2008 race, with a field of stalwartly liberal politicians. Mrs. Clinton was slightly more liberal in 2008 than now, according to Crowdpac, which scores politicians on a left-right scale of -10 to 10. (Crowdpac bases this mainly on campaign contributions, but also on votes and speeches.) Her problem was that Barack Obama, who was further to the left of her — at -7.8 to her -6.9 — also had the donors who were to the left of her. He ran a better campaign, particularly in Iowa, and benefited from a surge in money from small-dollar donors.
This time, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (-8.2) and Bernie Sanders (-8.3), Vermont’s independent senator, are to her left. Ms. Warren has the higher fund-raising profile of the two, with a leadership PAC that raised more than $2 million during the 2014 election cycle. But she and Mrs. Clinton (and to a lesser extent Mr. Sanders) would be competing for a similar pool of donors. During her 2012 Senate race, Ms. Warren raised more than $3.4 million from individuals who also gave to Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign, Federal Election Commission data shows.
HARD CORE LIBERAL

The Senate Votes That Divided Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders
Hillary Clinton Is A Progressive Democrat, Despite What You May Have HeardHillary Rodham Clinton is a liberal Democrat on domestic matters, and Bernie Sanders is a socialist. They voted the same way 93 percent of the time in the two years they shared in the Senate.
In fact, from January 2007 to January 2009, Mrs. Clinton, representing New York, voted with Mr. Sanders about as often as she did with the like-minded Democrats Ron Wyden of Oregon and Barbara Mikulski of Maryland.
kalm, Please.Stop.Bernie Sanders has said that Hillary Clinton is not a “true progressive” and many of his supporters seem to agree. It’s one reason that Sanders keeps performing well in primaries and caucuses, prolonging the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.
But whether that assessment of Clinton is accurate depends entirely on what it means to be a true progressive nowadays.
Does it mean voting like Sanders has, and embracing his agenda? Or does it simply mean consistently pushing for policies that would significantly advance progressive causes, like a fairer economy and a cleaner environment?
By the first definition, Clinton clearly doesn’t qualify as a progressive.
By the second, she clearly does.
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Vidav wrote:No one claimed they were.89Hen wrote: She is not right of center, Bill was not right of center, his SCOTUS appointees were not right of center.
/discussion
kalm wrote:Because I think Hillary is center right (similar to her husband) and would have made appointments along those lines

-
Ivytalk
- Supporter

- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Nobody bullshyts 89Hen and gets away with it!89Hen wrote:Vidav wrote:
No one claimed they were.
kalm wrote:Because I think Hillary is center right (similar to her husband) and would have made appointments along those lines
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69102
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Classic 89 cut and paste.Ivytalk wrote:Nobody bullshyts 89Hen and gets away with it!89Hen wrote:![]()
You two know I explained that and even owned it to a certain degree.
What a pair of dicks....
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
I think the only escape route for kalm is to claim the whole thing is nuanced and then just not post in this thread again. Let's see if he takes that out from this beating...

- ALPHAGRIZ1
- Level5

- Posts: 16077
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
- I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
- A.K.A.: Fuck Off
- Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Baldy just took kalms other ball and went home..................#ownedBaldy wrote:kalm wrote:
We've been through this before...just off the top of my head and I know there are more examples...
Neo-conservative on foreign policy...![]()
Defender of Wall Street...![]()
Against legalization of weed...![]()
Believes Snowden is a traitor...![]()
Security State...![]()
Yeah...what a lib!![]()
And yes...she's not the only one. Chuck Schumer is a Wall Street shill as well. The Democrats had to go after big money as the unions declined.
And yes...she pivoted to the left on free college education and paid lip service to a few other Bernie ideas but as we found out with Obama...most of the liberal campaign promises are "Hope" (in one hand).![]()
Hillary Clinton Was Liberal. Hillary Clinton Is Liberal.Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Democrats: Mostly Liberal, TogetherA bunch of reporters have recently discovered a shocking truth: Hillary Clinton is liberal! (I heard a rumor that Columbo has been helping with the investigation.)
We’ve gotten this raft of “Clinton is liberal” exposés as Clinton has revved up her 2016 campaign, speaking out in support of gay marriage, a pathway to citizenship for immigrants in the U.S. illegally, and criminal justice reform. But what many of these articles miss is that Clinton has always been, by most measures, pretty far to the left. When she’s shifted positions, it has been in concert with the entire Democratic Party.
To see how these different issues fit together to form an overall political ideology, we usually use three metrics: one based on congressional voting record, one based on public statements and one based on fundraising.Hillary Clinton On The IssuesAmong seven potential Democratic presidential contenders, Hillary Clinton is the overwhelming favorite — and the third-most liberal candidate. How the other candidates are arrayed on an ideological spectrum could make her run for the White House easier than the last time out.
In some ways, the cast of candidates for 2016 resembles the group from the 2008 race, with a field of stalwartly liberal politicians. Mrs. Clinton was slightly more liberal in 2008 than now, according to Crowdpac, which scores politicians on a left-right scale of -10 to 10. (Crowdpac bases this mainly on campaign contributions, but also on votes and speeches.) Her problem was that Barack Obama, who was further to the left of her — at -7.8 to her -6.9 — also had the donors who were to the left of her. He ran a better campaign, particularly in Iowa, and benefited from a surge in money from small-dollar donors.
This time, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (-8.2) and Bernie Sanders (-8.3), Vermont’s independent senator, are to her left. Ms. Warren has the higher fund-raising profile of the two, with a leadership PAC that raised more than $2 million during the 2014 election cycle. But she and Mrs. Clinton (and to a lesser extent Mr. Sanders) would be competing for a similar pool of donors. During her 2012 Senate race, Ms. Warren raised more than $3.4 million from individuals who also gave to Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign, Federal Election Commission data shows.
HARD CORE LIBERAL
The Senate Votes That Divided Hillary Clinton and Bernie SandersHillary Clinton Is A Progressive Democrat, Despite What You May Have HeardHillary Rodham Clinton is a liberal Democrat on domestic matters, and Bernie Sanders is a socialist. They voted the same way 93 percent of the time in the two years they shared in the Senate.
In fact, from January 2007 to January 2009, Mrs. Clinton, representing New York, voted with Mr. Sanders about as often as she did with the like-minded Democrats Ron Wyden of Oregon and Barbara Mikulski of Maryland.kalm, Please.Stop.Bernie Sanders has said that Hillary Clinton is not a “true progressive” and many of his supporters seem to agree. It’s one reason that Sanders keeps performing well in primaries and caucuses, prolonging the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.
But whether that assessment of Clinton is accurate depends entirely on what it means to be a true progressive nowadays.
Does it mean voting like Sanders has, and embracing his agenda? Or does it simply mean consistently pushing for policies that would significantly advance progressive causes, like a fairer economy and a cleaner environment?
By the first definition, Clinton clearly doesn’t qualify as a progressive.
By the second, she clearly does.
![]()

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black
The flat earth society has members all around the globe
-
Ivytalk
- Supporter

- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
"The butthurt is strong with this one!"kalm wrote:Classic 89 cut and paste.Ivytalk wrote: Nobody bullshyts 89Hen and gets away with it!![]()
You two know I explained that and even owned it to a certain degree.
What a pair of dicks....
Yup, "owned it" to the degree of trying to get the last word on every picayune point in this thread!
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69102
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Finally...somebody at least makes a decent effort supported by facts. I'll look at this stiff in awhile and reply when I get chance.Baldy wrote:kalm wrote:
We've been through this before...just off the top of my head and I know there are more examples...
Neo-conservative on foreign policy...![]()
Defender of Wall Street...![]()
Against legalization of weed...![]()
Believes Snowden is a traitor...![]()
Security State...![]()
Yeah...what a lib!![]()
And yes...she's not the only one. Chuck Schumer is a Wall Street shill as well. The Democrats had to go after big money as the unions declined.
And yes...she pivoted to the left on free college education and paid lip service to a few other Bernie ideas but as we found out with Obama...most of the liberal campaign promises are "Hope" (in one hand).![]()
Hillary Clinton Was Liberal. Hillary Clinton Is Liberal.Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Democrats: Mostly Liberal, TogetherA bunch of reporters have recently discovered a shocking truth: Hillary Clinton is liberal! (I heard a rumor that Columbo has been helping with the investigation.)
We’ve gotten this raft of “Clinton is liberal” exposés as Clinton has revved up her 2016 campaign, speaking out in support of gay marriage, a pathway to citizenship for immigrants in the U.S. illegally, and criminal justice reform. But what many of these articles miss is that Clinton has always been, by most measures, pretty far to the left. When she’s shifted positions, it has been in concert with the entire Democratic Party.
To see how these different issues fit together to form an overall political ideology, we usually use three metrics: one based on congressional voting record, one based on public statements and one based on fundraising.Hillary Clinton On The IssuesAmong seven potential Democratic presidential contenders, Hillary Clinton is the overwhelming favorite — and the third-most liberal candidate. How the other candidates are arrayed on an ideological spectrum could make her run for the White House easier than the last time out.
In some ways, the cast of candidates for 2016 resembles the group from the 2008 race, with a field of stalwartly liberal politicians. Mrs. Clinton was slightly more liberal in 2008 than now, according to Crowdpac, which scores politicians on a left-right scale of -10 to 10. (Crowdpac bases this mainly on campaign contributions, but also on votes and speeches.) Her problem was that Barack Obama, who was further to the left of her — at -7.8 to her -6.9 — also had the donors who were to the left of her. He ran a better campaign, particularly in Iowa, and benefited from a surge in money from small-dollar donors.
This time, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts (-8.2) and Bernie Sanders (-8.3), Vermont’s independent senator, are to her left. Ms. Warren has the higher fund-raising profile of the two, with a leadership PAC that raised more than $2 million during the 2014 election cycle. But she and Mrs. Clinton (and to a lesser extent Mr. Sanders) would be competing for a similar pool of donors. During her 2012 Senate race, Ms. Warren raised more than $3.4 million from individuals who also gave to Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign, Federal Election Commission data shows.
HARD CORE LIBERAL
The Senate Votes That Divided Hillary Clinton and Bernie SandersHillary Clinton Is A Progressive Democrat, Despite What You May Have HeardHillary Rodham Clinton is a liberal Democrat on domestic matters, and Bernie Sanders is a socialist. They voted the same way 93 percent of the time in the two years they shared in the Senate.
In fact, from January 2007 to January 2009, Mrs. Clinton, representing New York, voted with Mr. Sanders about as often as she did with the like-minded Democrats Ron Wyden of Oregon and Barbara Mikulski of Maryland.kalm, Please.Stop.Bernie Sanders has said that Hillary Clinton is not a “true progressive” and many of his supporters seem to agree. It’s one reason that Sanders keeps performing well in primaries and caucuses, prolonging the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.
But whether that assessment of Clinton is accurate depends entirely on what it means to be a true progressive nowadays.
Does it mean voting like Sanders has, and embracing his agenda? Or does it simply mean consistently pushing for policies that would significantly advance progressive causes, like a fairer economy and a cleaner environment?
By the first definition, Clinton clearly doesn’t qualify as a progressive.
By the second, she clearly does.
![]()
Thanks, Baldy!
-
Ivytalk
- Supporter

- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
While you're at it, please come up with a rational response to my analysis of the ideological composition of SCOTUS that I posted a few pages ago.kalm wrote:Finally...somebody at least makes a decent effort supported by facts. I'll look at this stiff in awhile and reply when I get chance.Baldy wrote:![]()
Hillary Clinton Was Liberal. Hillary Clinton Is Liberal.
Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Democrats: Mostly Liberal, Together
Hillary Clinton On The Issues
HARD CORE LIBERAL
The Senate Votes That Divided Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders
Hillary Clinton Is A Progressive Democrat, Despite What You May Have Heard
kalm, Please.Stop.
![]()
Thanks, Baldy!
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
It's nuanced.kalm wrote:Finally...somebody at least makes a decent effort supported by facts. I'll look at this stiff in awhile and reply when I get chance.Baldy wrote:![]()
Hillary Clinton Was Liberal. Hillary Clinton Is Liberal.
Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Democrats: Mostly Liberal, Together
Hillary Clinton On The Issues
HARD CORE LIBERAL
The Senate Votes That Divided Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders
Hillary Clinton Is A Progressive Democrat, Despite What You May Have Heard
kalm, Please.Stop.
![]()
Thanks, Baldy!
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote: Baldy just took kalms other ball and went home..................#owned

-
houndawg
- Level5

- Posts: 25090
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Bullshit. She's to the right of Eisenhower.89Hen wrote:She is not right of center, Bill was not right of center, his SCOTUS appointees were not right of center.kalm wrote:
Why? Hillary is a liberal because of a few pandering campaign promises and she has a D behind her name?![]()
Labels are always interesting things. Some would hesitate to call GWB a conservative based on his spending, medicare part D, home ownership society, and nation building...but I digress...
/discussion
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69102
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
I did. It went something like this...Ivytalk wrote:While you're at it, please come up with a rational response to my analysis of the ideological composition of SCOTUS that I posted a few pages ago.kalm wrote:
Finally...somebody at least makes a decent effort supported by facts. I'll look at this stiff in awhile and reply when I get chance.
Thanks, Baldy!

-
CAA Flagship
- 4th&29

- Posts: 38528
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Damn. There seems to be a gluten-free bonfire going on here.
-
Ivytalk
- Supporter

- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
Ha. Good one.kalm wrote:I did. It went something like this...Ivytalk wrote: While you're at it, please come up with a rational response to my analysis of the ideological composition of SCOTUS that I posted a few pages ago.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
-
YoUDeeMan
- Level5

- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
That hole is 6.93 feet deep...anyone want to guess who the genius is that dug it?Baldy wrote:
![]()
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?
-
Ivytalk
- Supporter

- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Thankful for SCOTUS
I dunno, but he's wearing klamdiggers.Cluck U wrote:That hole is 6.93 feet deep...anyone want to guess who the genius is that dug it?Baldy wrote:
![]()
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.



