Find the Democrat...

[89Hen]

Okay...
So all the Republicans got together collectively of their own volition
and agreed to vote the same on this because it seems like good legislation



Okee Dokee

Did I say it was good legislation? You act as if votes don't go down party lines often. WTF?

[kalm]

They orchestrated it themselves. YOU posted, "find the democrat"... we found them, on the same list. You were just too lazy to actually read the article and maybe click one or two more levels down to see they accepted the same money. The fact that they voted against doesn't mean they have higher standards. Just find an issue where Dems all voted yea on a measure and I'm sure you could do this just in reverse. I do not apologize for the R's or the D's, just pointing out that the money had nothing to do with this. If the R's had received a bunch of money that the D's didn't, you might have a point. But that's not the case.

Okay...
So all the Republicans got together collectively of their own volition
and agreed to vote the same on this because it seems like good legislation



Okee Dokee

We need a smug prick emoji because I'd be sporting it right about now...

[Chizzang]

Okay...
So all the Republicans got together collectively of their own volition
and agreed to vote the same on this because it seems like good legislation



Okee Dokee

Did I say it was good legislation? You act as if votes don't go down party lines often. WTF?

Indeed,
Party lines are real
and key examples would be
1) Gun legislation
2) Abortion rights
3) Union

And every time those party lines are voted on
it's because its seen as good legislation (both for and against)

If everybody in one party voted one way
There's got to be a reason
it's seen as good legislation
or something else

You already said it not good legislation
what is the other reason an ENTIRE PARTY would vote one way..?



You're saying this is common
Give me an example where
an entire party voted unanimously for legislation they didn't agree with

[89Hen]

an entire party voted unanimously for legislation they didn't agree with

Your extrapolation today is really terrible Cleets. Did you skip your second cup of coffee?

[CID1990]

Did I say it was good legislation? You act as if votes don't go down party lines often. WTF?

Indeed,
Party lines are real
and key examples would be
1) Gun legislation
2) Abortion rights
3) Union

And every time those party lines are voted on
it's because its seen as good legislation (both for and against)

If everybody in one party voted one way
There's got to be a reason
it's seen as good legislation
or something else

You already said it not good legislation
what is the other reason an ENTIRE PARTY would vote one way..?



You're saying this is common
Give me an example where
an entire party voted unanimously for legislation they didn't agree with

Mostly


But there are a few honest brokers too-

Like Bernie Sanders on gun control

Or former Sen James Webb on pretty much everything


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

Indeed,
Party lines are real
and key examples would be
1) Gun legislation
2) Abortion rights
3) Union

And every time those party lines are voted on
it's because its seen as good legislation (both for and against)

If everybody in one party voted one way
There's got to be a reason
it's seen as good legislation
or something else

You already said it not good legislation
what is the other reason an ENTIRE PARTY would vote one way..?



You're saying this is common
Give me an example where
an entire party voted unanimously for legislation they didn't agree with

Mostly


But there are a few honest brokers too-

Like Bernie Sanders on gun control

Or former Sen James Webb on pretty much everything

You're proving my point CID

[89Hen]

BTW, you do know 15 R's voted nay. Don't you?

[CID1990]

Mostly


But there are a few honest brokers too-

Like Bernie Sanders on gun control

Or former Sen James Webb on pretty much everything

You're proving my point CID

I said MOSTLY you smug shitgibbon prick


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ivytalk]

You're proving my point CID

I said MOSTLY you smug shitgibbon prick


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What is this shitgibbon of which you speak?

Do gibbons throw their own shyt?

[houndawg]

They would have been had their votes been needed.

VERY doubtful given their records.

And more high profile and recent legislative activity suggests that neither of them are inclined to go with the Trumpy bloc, which could be more damaging to them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

..they're playing long, hoping they won't get flushed in '18.

[houndawg]

oh... I see
and who exactly orchestrated this mass lemming migration..?

Your smugness has made this pointless.

nice tap out.

[houndawg]

Indeed,
Party lines are real
and key examples would be
1) Gun legislation
2) Abortion rights
3) Union

And every time those party lines are voted on
it's because its seen as good legislation (both for and against)

If everybody in one party voted one way
There's got to be a reason
it's seen as good legislation
or something else

You already said it not good legislation
what is the other reason an ENTIRE PARTY would vote one way..?



You're saying this is common
Give me an example where
an entire party voted unanimously for legislation they didn't agree with

Mostly


But there are a few honest brokers too-

Like Bernie Sanders on gun control

Or former Sen James Webb on pretty much everything


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting fellow - could find some traction when time comes to clean up after this miserable failure.

[89Hen]

Your smugness has made this pointless.

nice tap out.

Don't try to insert yourself into this one.

[houndawg]

nice tap out.

Don't try to insert yourself into this one.

One more won't hurt. I'll wear a condom.

[89Hen]

Don't try to insert yourself into this one.

One more won't hurt. I'll wear a condom.

It's rape if you're not welcomed.