Mark Sanford Threads

[Mountaineer]

He said his wife knew five months ago. I assume he realized that this would be made public. That is usually what brings out one's conscience.

Oh, of course.

Along with contrition and feelings of remorse - code for: I'm sorry I got caught.

[Appaholic]

Agree.....why you never have to worry about Governor Appa......

I think that's a good point. If someone runs for governor and says I am going to drink until I puke and screw every woman that comes in my office and you get elected then you have Appa's vote

fify

[dbackjon]

Mark Sanford:

Q Should South Carolina recognize civil unions between same-sex couples?
A: No.

Q: Should South Carolina restrict marriage to a union only between a man and a woman?

A: Yes.


Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC.
Vote on an amendment banning adoptions in District of Columbia by gays or other individuals who are not related by blood or marriage.


Bastard....

[citdog]

Mark Sanford:

Q Should South Carolina recognize civil unions between same-sex couples?
A: No.

Q: Should South Carolina restrict marriage to a union only between a man and a woman?

A: Yes.


Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC.
Vote on an amendment banning adoptions in District of Columbia by gays or other individuals who are not related by blood or marriage.


Bastard....

as he should have............DEVIANTS DON'T DESERVE SPECIAL RIGHTS

[dbackjon]

Mark Sanford:

Q Should South Carolina recognize civil unions between same-sex couples?
A: No.

Q: Should South Carolina restrict marriage to a union only between a man and a woman?

A: Yes.


Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC.
Vote on an amendment banning adoptions in District of Columbia by gays or other individuals who are not related by blood or marriage.


Bastard....

as he should have............DEVIANTS DON'T DESERVE SPECIAL RIGHTS

Agreed - those that think it is still 1860 should be locked up

[OL FU]

Mark Sanford:

Q Should South Carolina recognize civil unions between same-sex couples?
A: No.

Q: Should South Carolina restrict marriage to a union only between a man and a woman?

A: Yes.


Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC.
Vote on an amendment banning adoptions in District of Columbia by gays or other individuals who are not related by blood or marriage.


Bastard....

I realize that the gay issue is a lot more important to you than most. I can never remember voting for candidate whom I agreed with 100%.

Who do you vote for if you are a small government fiscal conservative, supporter of gay marriage but don't think it is a constitutional right, pro-abortion but anti Roe v Wade, strong supporter of the first amendment and opposed to almost all government intrusions into one's personal life from books we read to who we sleep with and including reaching into a person's private property (income and taking excessive amounts of taxes). A republican on fiscal issues even though there are few republicans that really believe that, A democrat on social issues, A republican on constitutional issues ( mostly not all the time, I certainly think the legislature should take some of their power back that they have delegated over the years to the executive branch ) and probably split the difference between dems and repubs on defense and foreign policy.

Damn no wonder FU grad's are so FU'd

[AZGrizFan]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090624/ap_ ... rnor_where

Sanford was born May 28, 1960, in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., the eldest of four siblings. He earned a bachelor's degree in business from Furman University in 1983 and a master's of business administration from the University of Virginia in 1988.

There's yer problem right there.

[dbackjon]

Yes FU, you are FU'd

My main point on the Gay Marriage issue with Sanford is the hypocrasy of it all.

[OL FU]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090624/ap_ ... rnor_where

Sanford was born May 28, 1960, in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., the eldest of four siblings. He earned a bachelor's degree in business from Furman University in 1983 and a master's of business administration from the University of Virginia in 1988.

There's yer problem right there.

Next thing we find out is he is off doing cocaine with graduates of the other school that runs the state - Citadel Grads

[OL FU]

Yes FU, you are FU'd

My main point on the Gay Marriage issue with Sanford is the hypocrasy of it all.

Hypocrisy could have been worse, Lindsey Graham could have been on the flight to Argentina with him.

[dbackjon]

Yes FU, you are FU'd

My main point on the Gay Marriage issue with Sanford is the hypocrasy of it all.

Hypocrisy could have been worse, Lindsey Graham could have been on the flight to Argentina with him.

[Ivytalk]

Remember Diogenes of Sinope, the old character who always carried a lamp in search of an honest man? Well, the Republican Party's Diogenes is searching for a Presidential candidate who can "keep it zipped." (Pace Eliot Spitzer....the flaw crosses party lines.)

[AZGrizFan]

Remember Diogenes of Sinope, the old character who always carried a lamp in search of an honest man? Well, the Republican Party's Diogenes is searching for a Presidential candidate who can "keep it zipped." (Pace Eliot Spitzer....the flaw crosses party lines.)

Apparently as long as you can keep it zipped it doesn't matter if you think there's 57 states, can't speak a coherent sentence without a teleprompter, and have issues with "gayness".

[Ivytalk]

Yes FU, you are FU'd

My main point on the Gay Marriage issue with Sanford is the hypocrasy of it all.

Hypocrisy could have been worse, Lindsey Graham could have been on the flight to Argentina with him.

Has he beeen "outed" yet?

[dbackjon]

Remember Diogenes of Sinope, the old character who always carried a lamp in search of an honest man? Well, the Republican Party's Diogenes is searching for a Presidential candidate who can "keep it zipped." (Pace Eliot Spitzer....the flaw crosses party lines.)

At least Spitzer had the decency to resign from office.

[Ibanez]

Well, well. Another Family Values Republican violates one of the Ten Commandments.


Are there ANY that haven't cheated on their wives?

Yes, just like there are Democrats that haven't cheated on thier wives(or husbands)


He's human

Democrats have been guilty of this(McGrevey had threesomes and wound up banging dudes at truck stops)

Recovering from this will be difficult. Both come from money and in the limelight so recovery is possible.


I'm not defending him but I know most of you are very biased in your political leanings and many have the inability to think across party lines.

[ASUG8]

Remember Diogenes of Sinope, the old character who always carried a lamp in search of an honest man? Well, the Republican Party's Diogenes is searching for a Presidential candidate who can "keep it zipped." (Pace Eliot Spitzer....the flaw crosses party lines.)

At least Spitzer had the decency to resign from office.

I think Sanford will too. He's already realized this doesn't entitle him to be the Republican Governor's torchbearer.

[Ibanez]

Yes FU, you are FU'd

My main point on the Gay Marriage issue with Sanford is the hypocrasy of it all.

Hypocrisy could have been worse, Lindsey Graham could have been on the flight to Argentina with him.

THere's only time.

I was in Moncks Corner last weekend and there was a sign that said, " Mark Sanford Sucks" and that Lindsey Graham was a rat...something. I was going to fast on the return trip to read it.

[TwinTownBisonFan]

Well, well. Another Family Values Republican violates one of the Ten Commandments.


Are there ANY that haven't cheated on their wives?

Yes, just like there are Democrats that haven't cheated on thier wives(or husbands)


He's human

Democrats have been guilty of this(McGrevey had threesomes and wound up banging dudes at truck stops)

Recovering from this will be difficult. Both come from money and in the limelight so recovery is possible.


I'm not defending him but I know most of you are very biased in your political leanings and many have the inability to think across party lines.

Mark, i think the point is more that Sanford was one of those "family values" drones who decried gay marriage as "violating the sanctity of marriage" then when out and violated the sanctity of his own...

i dont think comparisons to McGreevey or Spitzer are apt, as they haven't built their careers on being holier than thou... just like larry craig... the hypocrisy is the problem IMO.

[dbackjon]

Yes, just like there are Democrats that haven't cheated on thier wives(or husbands)


He's human

Democrats have been guilty of this(McGrevey had threesomes and wound up banging dudes at truck stops)

Recovering from this will be difficult. Both come from money and in the limelight so recovery is possible.


I'm not defending him but I know most of you are very biased in your political leanings and many have the inability to think across party lines.

Mark, i think the point is more that Sanford was one of those "family values" drones who decried gay marriage as "violating the sanctity of marriage" then when out and violated the sanctity of his own...

i dont think comparisons to McGreevey or Spitzer are apt, as they haven't built their careers on being holier than thou... just like larry craig... the hypocrisy is the problem IMO.

Exactly

[Mountaineer]

Mark, i think the point is more that Sanford was one of those "family values" drones who decried gay marriage as "violating the sanctity of marriage" then when out and violated the sanctity of his own...

...the hypocrisy is the problem IMO.

This. All day, for the love of God, this.

[OL FU]

Yes, just like there are Democrats that haven't cheated on thier wives(or husbands)


He's human

Democrats have been guilty of this(McGrevey had threesomes and wound up banging dudes at truck stops)

Recovering from this will be difficult. Both come from money and in the limelight so recovery is possible.


I'm not defending him but I know most of you are very biased in your political leanings and many have the inability to think across party lines.

Mark, i think the point is more that Sanford was one of those "family values" drones who decried gay marriage as "violating the sanctity of marriage" then when out and violated the sanctity of his own...

i dont think comparisons to McGreevey or Spitzer are apt, as they haven't built their careers on being holier than thou... just like larry craig... the hypocrisy is the problem IMO.

Spitzer actually was worse. He broke the law

[Ibanez]

Yes, just like there are Democrats that haven't cheated on thier wives(or husbands)


He's human

Democrats have been guilty of this(McGrevey had threesomes and wound up banging dudes at truck stops)

Recovering from this will be difficult. Both come from money and in the limelight so recovery is possible.


I'm not defending him but I know most of you are very biased in your political leanings and many have the inability to think across party lines.

Mark, i think the point is more that Sanford was one of those "family values" drones who decried gay marriage as "violating the sanctity of marriage" then when out and violated the sanctity of his own...

i dont think comparisons to McGreevey or Spitzer are apt, as they haven't built their careers on being holier than thou... just like larry craig... the hypocrisy is the problem IMO.

I understand the hypocrisy, but you do really think Democrats like McGreevy or Spitzer would have advertised themselves as Anti-Family Values?

Of course not, the difference is that Republicans use that to set them apart. Yes, he fvcked up but let's not forget that there are people like McGreevy, Spitzer and Clinton that have done this. Hell, Clinton used the police to round up his bitches.

[Ibanez]

Yes, just like there are Democrats that haven't cheated on thier wives(or husbands)


He's human

Democrats have been guilty of this(McGrevey had threesomes and wound up banging dudes at truck stops)

Recovering from this will be difficult. Both come from money and in the limelight so recovery is possible.


I'm not defending him but I know most of you are very biased in your political leanings and many have the inability to think across party lines.

Mark, i think the point is more that Sanford was one of those "family values" drones who decried gay marriage as "violating the sanctity of marriage" then when out and violated the sanctity of his own...

i dont think comparisons to McGreevey or Spitzer are apt, as they haven't built their careers on being holier than thou... just like larry craig... the hypocrisy is the problem IMO.

I understand the hypocrisy, but you do really think Democrats like McGreevy or Spitzer would have advertised themselves as Anti-Family Values?

Of course not, the difference is that Republicans use that to set them apart. Yes, he fvcked up but let's not forget that there are people like McGreevy, Spitzer and Clinton that have done this. Hell, Clinton used the police to round up his bitches.

[TwinTownBisonFan]

Mark, i think the point is more that Sanford was one of those "family values" drones who decried gay marriage as "violating the sanctity of marriage" then when out and violated the sanctity of his own...

i dont think comparisons to McGreevey or Spitzer are apt, as they haven't built their careers on being holier than thou... just like larry craig... the hypocrisy is the problem IMO.

I understand the hypocrisy, but you do really think Democrats like McGreevy or Spitzer would have advertised themselves as Anti-Family Values?

Of course not, the difference is that Republicans use that to set them apart. Yes, he fvcked up but let's not forget that there are people like McGreevy, Spitzer and Clinton that have done this. Hell, Clinton used the police to round up his bitches.

not a single one of them campaigned by whipping up their voters to repudiate people who were "anti-family" and he has... that's the difference. this guy made his career out of scaring other voters that his opponents wanted to "destroy the American family" and "end marriage as we know it" meanwhile he's out being an adulterer...