The Evolution Fail/Religion Hijack Thread

Political discussions
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19034
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: The Evolution Fail/Religion Hijack Thread

Post by SeattleGriz »

CID1990 wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:For me, Christian.

As to your "complaint department" question, you as well do not understand what ID is saying.

While there may be deeper motives, what they are selling is that we don't have a good explanation for big complex structures. Hence, it taking intelligence, because you can't mutate your way there to building multi step structures.
That is a re-wording of "we don't know, therefore, Jesus", verbatim

I think I have probably the greatest understanding of ID in the room, actually

But you are an admitted Christian - therefore you believe that Jesus was literally the offspring of this intelligent designer, who could have just waited a few years and sent us an email instead
Ah. The Cleets self declared expertise line!

Sure it's a God of the gaps argument, just as the Evolution of the gaps is used dogmatically.

Used so dogmatically, that a false prediction is somehow turned into a win.

Global warming and evolution both pull this stunt regularly.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: The Evolution Fail/Religion Hijack Thread

Post by Ibanez »

SeattleGriz wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
Your answer suggests there are other gods. :coffee:
Cids original question implied plural, he was asking which one.
But your answer was the "one true god" which implies multiple gods (it's ok, Israelite's believed in many gods).
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: The Evolution Fail/Religion Hijack Thread

Post by Ibanez »

css75 wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Im still asking - which one is the true god?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jesus said I am the way, the truth and the life. No man can come to the father but by me.

In other passages he states their will be false gods. I believe LDS and Islam are in this category.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So, we agree that there are other Gods. :coffee: Jews, Christians and Muslims follow the God of Abraham (Warning: Interpretations may vary by location.)
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by Ibanez »

Bisonfanatical wrote:
Ibanez wrote: :dunce: What the hell does any of that mean?

Why can'y you people just accept that 1000s of years ago, people had a lot of questions they couldn't answer so it was attributed to a God. Since then, we've learned that some things happen for a reason and wasn't b/c God did it. God doesn't create lightening storms or kill your 1st born at random. Why can't you understand that they were trying to understand something that was a mystery to them. As we learn, perhaps attribute to God-given logic the revelation that a disease from the putrid water killed Timmy and not God.

It's the like laws in Exodus and Leviticus. Those asinine laws might have been the best wisdom of the day but they are wrong and/or un reasonable by any modern standard. We don't need to burn people for wearing a poly/cotton blend. We certainly don't sanction slavery or killing people that work on the Sabbath.
I can understand your view in part, but for those of us who have never been a part of the laws of Exodus or Leviticus, which is most of us, not only do we not understand the reason behind them but we also do not understand the views of their God.

One might reason that you would believe in these things if you were a Israelite who possessed a personal relationship for a few thousand years with the God of their faith (Old Testament).

On the other hand, the Christians follow their god of the New Testament, which in itself has been a sort of on going study, an ever changing evolution of faith over the last 1700 years, which of course has a different view of the previous group.

Which of course brings us to the Islamists ,who have their god of their own faith, and they have their own requirements based on their own faith also.
It is hard to gather all these groups under one umbrella since they are not a homogenous group nor do they share the same belief

Then here are many other groups who have different gods, or no belief in any god, which of course is convenient and allows much freedom for constantly changing view points when you are not confined to the constraints of a written document.

Now, depending upon which group you identify with would make that statement you made, far more understandable. The sabbath for instance is only important to the practicing Israelites/Jews/Prostelytes, to the rest of the world, not so much.

Observing the Saturday Sabbath for instance has not changed to a practicing Israelite, but to the Sunday sabbath believing Christians, it is of no (or limited) consequence.


Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
I read this twice and have no idea what you're talking about. If you aren't " part of the laws of Exodus or Leviticus," then what are you? The Christian Bible is both the OT and NT and we're instructed to live our lives according to its teachings.

There's the God of Abraham who is followed by Jews, Christians and Muslims. The difference is in the scripture and interpretation (among many other things).

And saying the Sabbath is only important to the "practicing Israelites/Jews/Prostelytes" is probably one of the most ridiculous statements in this thread - which is saying a lot. I'm sure you meant to say something else, because surely Catholics, Protestants and Muslims keep holy the Sabbath. I know quite a few old timers that will not do anything on a Sunday b/c it's a day of rest.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: The Evolution Fail/Religion Hijack Thread

Post by ∞∞∞ »

Ibanez wrote:
css75 wrote:
Jesus said I am the way, the truth and the life. No man can come to the father but by me.

In other passages he states their will be false gods. I believe LDS and Islam are in this category.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So, we agree that there are other Gods. :coffee: Jews, Christians and Muslims follow the God of Abraham (Warning: Interpretations may vary by location.)
That's why I find it ridiculous when I tell someone I'm an atheist and their reply is, "Well I think it's worth believing in God just in case." Besides really dumbing down how God might think with that explanation, my reply is always the same: Why should I believe in your God?
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19034
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by SeattleGriz »

Ibanez wrote:
Bisonfanatical wrote:
I can understand your view in part, but for those of us who have never been a part of the laws of Exodus or Leviticus, which is most of us, not only do we not understand the reason behind them but we also do not understand the views of their God.

One might reason that you would believe in these things if you were a Israelite who possessed a personal relationship for a few thousand years with the God of their faith (Old Testament).

On the other hand, the Christians follow their god of the New Testament, which in itself has been a sort of on going study, an ever changing evolution of faith over the last 1700 years, which of course has a different view of the previous group.

Which of course brings us to the Islamists ,who have their god of their own faith, and they have their own requirements based on their own faith also.
It is hard to gather all these groups under one umbrella since they are not a homogenous group nor do they share the same belief

Then here are many other groups who have different gods, or no belief in any god, which of course is convenient and allows much freedom for constantly changing view points when you are not confined to the constraints of a written document.

Now, depending upon which group you identify with would make that statement you made, far more understandable. The sabbath for instance is only important to the practicing Israelites/Jews/Prostelytes, to the rest of the world, not so much.

Observing the Saturday Sabbath for instance has not changed to a practicing Israelite, but to the Sunday sabbath believing Christians, it is of no (or limited) consequence.


Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
I read this twice and have no idea what you're talking about. If you aren't " part of the laws of Exodus or Leviticus," then what are you? The Christian Bible is both the OT and NT and we're instructed to live our lives according to its teachings.

There's the God of Abraham who is followed by Jews, Christians and Muslims. The difference is in the scripture and interpretation (among many other things).

And saying the Sabbath is only important to the "practicing Israelites/Jews/Prostelytes" is probably one of the most ridiculous statements in this thread - which is saying a lot. I'm sure you meant to say something else, because surely Catholics, Protestants and Muslims keep holy the Sabbath. I know quite a few old timers that will not do anything on a Sunday b/c it's a day of rest.
Look at it via the covenants with God. That should help you understand why old laws don't apply.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by Ibanez »

SeattleGriz wrote:
Ibanez wrote: I read this twice and have no idea what you're talking about. If you aren't " part of the laws of Exodus or Leviticus," then what are you? The Christian Bible is both the OT and NT and we're instructed to live our lives according to its teachings.

There's the God of Abraham who is followed by Jews, Christians and Muslims. The difference is in the scripture and interpretation (among many other things).

And saying the Sabbath is only important to the "practicing Israelites/Jews/Prostelytes" is probably one of the most ridiculous statements in this thread - which is saying a lot. I'm sure you meant to say something else, because surely Catholics, Protestants and Muslims keep holy the Sabbath. I know quite a few old timers that will not do anything on a Sunday b/c it's a day of rest.
Look at it via the covenants with God. That should help you understand why old laws don't apply.

Which brings me back to my point - why do Christians pick and choose which to follow? And they do. Those laws were used to justify slavery.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by Chizzang »

Bisonfanatical wrote:
On the other hand, the Christians follow their god of the New Testament, which in itself has been a sort of on going study, an ever changing evolution of faith over the last 1700 years

This ^ section needs some explaining... because
I said the same thing, somewhat less kindly and got hammered by the resident Catholic Apologist

:geek:

He usually starts off by calling me some kind of an idiot and pseudo intellectual

:mrgreen:

In grade school - I think that means he likes me...
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19034
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by SeattleGriz »

Ibanez wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:Look at it via the covenants with God. That should help you understand why old laws don't apply.

Which brings me back to my point - why do Christians pick and choose which to follow? And they do. Those laws were used to justify slavery.
My guess would be the same reason other crap is chosen by humans. You pick and choose what is beneficial.

I've never understood how some can be considered a "lesser" creation when created by the same God. Same with women-equal.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by GannonFan »

SeattleGriz wrote:
Ibanez wrote:

Which brings me back to my point - why do Christians pick and choose which to follow? And they do. Those laws were used to justify slavery.
My guess would be the same reason other crap is chosen by humans. You pick and choose what is beneficial.

I've never understood how some can be considered a "lesser" creation when created by the same God. Same with women-equal.
Yup, anything that involves people is bound to be corruptible and religion is clearly not immune to that. People will always use things to their advantage to get advantages over other people - people using religion to justify slavery was/is just one small sliver of centuries of people trying to gain power over other people.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

The Evolution Fail/Religion Hijack Thread

Post by CID1990 »

SeattleGriz wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
That is a re-wording of "we don't know, therefore, Jesus", verbatim

I think I have probably the greatest understanding of ID in the room, actually

But you are an admitted Christian - therefore you believe that Jesus was literally the offspring of this intelligent designer, who could have just waited a few years and sent us an email instead
Ah. The Cleets self declared expertise line!

Sure it's a God of the gaps argument, just as the Evolution of the gaps is used dogmatically.

Used so dogmatically, that a false prediction is somehow turned into a win.

Global warming and evolution both pull this stunt regularly.
It isn't me using the "god of the gaps" argument. I'm pointing out that it is the cornerstone of the ID theory

Scientists of all stripes will freely tell you that our body of knowledge is now and always will be incomplete - and science itself has a process by which it can course-correct

faith has no such mechanism
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: The Evolution Fail/Religion Hijack Thread

Post by Chizzang »

CID1990 wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:Ah. The Cleets self declared expertise line!

Sure it's a God of the gaps argument, just as the Evolution of the gaps is used dogmatically.

Used so dogmatically, that a false prediction is somehow turned into a win.

Global warming and evolution both pull this stunt regularly.
It isn't me using the "god of the gaps" argument. I'm pointing out that it is the cornerstone of the ID theory

Scientists of all stripes will freely tell you that our body of knowledge is now and always will be incomplete - and science itself has a process by which it can course-correct

faith has no such mechanism
Pppffffft...!!!
Faith has no such mechanism - are you kitten me !

Divine Inspiration is religions course correction device

:lol:

That's how you "gather the council" and re-write the Bible 300 years later
and nobody flinches...

:shock:

Stand by
3..2..1 for Joe
about to call me an idiot
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: The Evolution Fail/Religion Hijack Thread

Post by CID1990 »

Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
It isn't me using the "god of the gaps" argument. I'm pointing out that it is the cornerstone of the ID theory

Scientists of all stripes will freely tell you that our body of knowledge is now and always will be incomplete - and science itself has a process by which it can course-correct

faith has no such mechanism
Pppffffft...!!!
Faith has no such mechanism - are you kitten me !

Divine Inspiration is religions course correction device

:lol:

That's how you re-write the Bible 300 years later
and nobody flinches
What is divine inspiration other than an expression of faith?

and you can "re-write" the bible all you want - all of the changes have been superficial in the grand scheme of things...

when some dude writes the next book of the bible (we'll call it the Book of Clifford) where he claims god came to him and said, "Just Kidding" then get back to me

:coffee:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: The Evolution Fail/Religion Hijack Thread

Post by Chizzang »

CID1990 wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
Pppffffft...!!!
Faith has no such mechanism - are you kitten me !

Divine Inspiration is religions course correction device

:lol:

That's how you re-write the Bible 300 years later
and nobody flinches
What is divine inspiration other than an expression of faith?

and you can "re-write" the bible all you want - all of the changes have been superficial in the grand scheme of things...

when some dude writes the next book of the bible (we'll call it the Book of Clifford) where he claims god came to him and said, "Just Kidding" then get back to me

:coffee:
True,
For an atheist they've been superficial and effectively change nothing (agreed)

For those that seek god some of the divinely inspired additions can be malicious and spiteful
changing the nature of god is serious business "adding stuff Jesus never said" as it were...

:nod:

Imagine if Christianity was ONLY about what Jesus actually said
There would be No televangelism / No prosperity gospel / No gay marriage issues / no defense of slavery
Jesus said none of that stuff it's all "divinely" added by other guys... that were NOT Jesus

Christianity would be nothing like the laughable circus side show that it has become
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
Bisonfanatical
Level1
Level1
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:54 am

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by Bisonfanatical »

Ibanez wrote:
Bisonfanatical wrote:
I can understand your view in part, but for those of us who have never been a part of the laws of Exodus or Leviticus, which is most of us, not only do we not understand the reason behind them but we also do not understand the views of their God.

One might reason that you would believe in these things if you were a Israelite who possessed a personal relationship for a few thousand years with the God of their faith (Old Testament).

On the other hand, the Christians follow their god of the New Testament, which in itself has been a sort of on going study, an ever changing evolution of faith over the last 1700 years, which of course has a different view of the previous group.

Which of course brings us to the Islamists ,who have their god of their own faith, and they have their own requirements based on their own faith also.
It is hard to gather all these groups under one umbrella since they are not a homogenous group nor do they share the same belief

Then here are many other groups who have different gods, or no belief in any god, which of course is convenient and allows much freedom for constantly changing view points when you are not confined to the constraints of a written document.

Now, depending upon which group you identify with would make that statement you made, far more understandable. The sabbath for instance is only important to the practicing Israelites/Jews/Prostelytes, to the rest of the world, not so much.

Observing the Saturday Sabbath for instance has not changed to a practicing Israelite, but to the Sunday sabbath believing Christians, it is of no (or limited) consequence.


Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
I read this twice and have no idea what you're talking about. If you aren't " part of the laws of Exodus or Leviticus," then what are you? The Christian Bible is both the OT and NT and we're instructed to live our lives according to its teachings.

There's the God of Abraham who is followed by Jews, Christians and Muslims. The difference is in the scripture and interpretation (among many other things).

And saying the Sabbath is only important to the "practicing Israelites/Jews/Prostelytes" is probably one of the most ridiculous statements in this thread - which is saying a lot. I'm sure you meant to say something else, because surely Catholics, Protestants and Muslims keep holy the Sabbath. I know quite a few old timers that will not do anything on a Sunday b/c it's a day of rest.
Unless you are an Israelite, your ancestors most certainly did not live under the 5 books of moses, not one of them, or mine, or an other non-Jewish person ... pretty straight forward.

Christians worship a god of the Israelites that they never knew, and don't want to understand. What they/we really worship is the 3 headed god of Constantine's Roman Universal Church. The Jesus God, even thought that name is only 500 years old or so. ..

The Sabbath is and always was Saturday, the day of the God who declared his name as Yehovah.
Sunday is some christian "lords day", the lord of the imagination perhaps. It is the first day of the week, not the 7th. It always has been and always will be.

The Christian bible is both the old testament, when it is useful, and the new testament in all of it manipulated scriptures.
The Israelite scriptures was only the old testament, which is called the Tanakh by them.

Don't ever think that the Messiah EVER quoted from the NT my friend because it never happened.

The God of Abraham never made a covenant with us, unless you have a chapter and verse you would like to share with the class?

P.S. the God of Abraham is only understood by the people who are declared his people in the OT, by Him.

Israelites, Christians, and Muslims most certainly do not worship the same gods, look at their belief systems.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19034
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: RE: The Evolution Fail/Religion Hijack Thread

Post by SeattleGriz »

CID1990 wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:Ah. The Cleets self declared expertise line!

Sure it's a God of the gaps argument, just as the Evolution of the gaps is used dogmatically.

Used so dogmatically, that a false prediction is somehow turned into a win.

Global warming and evolution both pull this stunt regularly.
It isn't me using the "god of the gaps" argument. I'm pointing out that it is the cornerstone of the ID theory

Scientists of all stripes will freely tell you that our body of knowledge is now and always will be incomplete - and science itself has a process by which it can course-correct

faith has no such mechanism
I actually believe I was agreeing with you on the God of the gaps statement.

In regards to the self correcting, I get that, as I worked in a graduate Biochemistry lab helping to determine the tertiary structure of ribosomal RNA. We had plenty of experiments that had to be changed and rerun to get to the answer.

My main beef has always been the claim of settled science, only to fall back to the safe haven of either, victory in the case of failed predictions or the self correcting excuse. That sort of dogmatic approach is not how the scientific theory works.

You want your theory challenged so it comes out stronger and that is not happening. In fairness though, I do realize ID is going after the weak points that don't have much proof, or ones they can easily stymie.

It's no coincidence evolutionists have stopped debating ID, because they can't beat them on the topics of debate. It's ends up being one PhD vs another PhD and neither know if they are right because the science hasn't gotten us there yet.

Sir.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
Bisonfanatical
Level1
Level1
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:54 am

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by Bisonfanatical »

SeattleGriz wrote:
Ibanez wrote: I read this twice and have no idea what you're talking about. If you aren't " part of the laws of Exodus or Leviticus," then what are you? The Christian Bible is both the OT and NT and we're instructed to live our lives according to its teachings.

There's the God of Abraham who is followed by Jews, Christians and Muslims. The difference is in the scripture and interpretation (among many other things).

And saying the Sabbath is only important to the "practicing Israelites/Jews/Prostelytes" is probably one of the most ridiculous statements in this thread - which is saying a lot. I'm sure you meant to say something else, because surely Catholics, Protestants and Muslims keep holy the Sabbath. I know quite a few old timers that will not do anything on a Sunday b/c it's a day of rest.
Look at it via the covenants with God. That should help you understand why old laws don't apply.
Interesting Christian point, however, if you really study the book of Deuteronomy you will find that what ever you believe in the NT absolutely MUST not deviate from the OT.
If you study it as a person who wants the truth, not as a Christisn who wants to hijack someone else's faith system, you will understand far more about your faith.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
User avatar
Bisonfanatical
Level1
Level1
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:54 am

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by Bisonfanatical »

Chizzang wrote:
Bisonfanatical wrote:
On the other hand, the Christians follow their god of the New Testament, which in itself has been a sort of on going study, an ever changing evolution of faith over the last 1700 years

This ^ section needs some explaining... because
I said the same thing, somewhat less kindly and got hammered by the resident Catholic Apologist

:geek:

He usually starts off by calling me some kind of an idiot and pseudo intellectual

:mrgreen:

In grade school - I think that means he likes me...
That is funny

You can quiz christians from any church denomination about things, and they will always find a way to say "well, that's not the God I believe in, the God I believe in ..." (fill in the blank)...lol

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
User avatar
Bisonfanatical
Level1
Level1
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:54 am

Re: RE: Re: The Evolution Fail/Religion Hijack Thread

Post by Bisonfanatical »

Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
It isn't me using the "god of the gaps" argument. I'm pointing out that it is the cornerstone of the ID theory

Scientists of all stripes will freely tell you that our body of knowledge is now and always will be incomplete - and science itself has a process by which it can course-correct

faith has no such mechanism
Pppffffft...!!!
Faith has no such mechanism - are you kitten me !

Divine Inspiration is religions course correction device

Image

That's how you "gather the council" and re-write the Bible 300 years later
and nobody flinches...

:shock:

Stand by
3..2..1 for Joe
about to call me an idiot
Quite right, the man made Council of Nicea, who did things forbidden by the God of the Israelites, and yet claim to be inspired by this same God of the Israelites, even though He declared that He never changes.
Image

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19034
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by SeattleGriz »

Bisonfanatical wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:Look at it via the covenants with God. That should help you understand why old laws don't apply.
Interesting Christian point, however, if you really study the book of Deuteronomy you will find that what ever you believe in the NT absolutely MUST not deviate from the OT.
If you study it as a person who wants the truth, not as a Christisn who wants to hijack someone else's faith system, you will understand far more about your faith.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Would you mind explaining why or send me a link with your line of thinking?

Because for me, a new covenant means just that. The old requirements no longer need to be met.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
Bisonfanatical
Level1
Level1
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:54 am

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by Bisonfanatical »

SeattleGriz wrote:
Bisonfanatical wrote:Interesting Christian point, however, if you really study the book of Deuteronomy you will find that what ever you believe in the NT absolutely MUST not deviate from the OT.
If you study it as a person who wants the truth, not as a Christisn who wants to hijack someone else's faith system, you will understand far more about your faith.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Would you mind explaining why or send me a link with your line of thinking?

Because for me, a new covenant means just that. The old requirements no longer need to be met.
For the God of the Israelites to make a new covenant with you christians, He had to have made an old covenant with you. I have never found this in the OT ... lol

If you were a decedent of the ones who left with Moses from Egypt, who made the covenant with their God who called himself Yehovah, then I stand corrected, however, If you family tree is NOT of the ORIGINAL Israelite family .... perhaps you worship what you do not understand?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by Chizzang »

SeattleGriz wrote:
Bisonfanatical wrote:Interesting Christian point, however, if you really study the book of Deuteronomy you will find that what ever you believe in the NT absolutely MUST not deviate from the OT.
If you study it as a person who wants the truth, not as a Christisn who wants to hijack someone else's faith system, you will understand far more about your faith.
Would you mind explaining why or send me a link with your line of thinking?

Because for me, a new covenant means just that. The old requirements no longer need to be met.
But what about the New New Testament
The Book of Mormon..?

Isn't that the most up-to-date direct communication with Jesus..?

:coffee:
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19034
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by SeattleGriz »

Bisonfanatical wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:Would you mind explaining why or send me a link with your line of thinking?

Because for me, a new covenant means just that. The old requirements no longer need to be met.
For the God of the Israelites to make a new covenant with you christians, He had to have made an old covenant with you. I have never found this in the OT ... lol

If you were a decedent of the ones who left with Moses from Egypt, who made the covenant with their God who called himself Yehovah, then I stand corrected, however, If you family tree is NOT of the ORIGINAL Israelite family .... perhaps you worship what you do not understand?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Why does God, who is going into a new covenant with a new group, need an old covenant with that same group He has never been in a covenant with before?

That seems impossible.

I obviously missed your point!
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19034
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by SeattleGriz »

Chizzang wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:Would you mind explaining why or send me a link with your line of thinking?

Because for me, a new covenant means just that. The old requirements no longer need to be met.
But what about the New New Testament
The Book of Mormon..?

Isn't that the most up-to-date direct communication with Jesus..?

:coffee:
First, was anything of value said in their meeting? If not, you can see why it isn't as up to date as you portray it to be.

Secondly, and this is where you failed to mention God's simple and absolute direction on prophecy, is that for a prophet of God to be an actual prophet, they will never be wrong. So, was any of the "prophecy discussion" false?
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oof! Evolution takes a faceplant.

Post by Ibanez »

Bisonfanatical wrote:
Ibanez wrote: I read this twice and have no idea what you're talking about. If you aren't " part of the laws of Exodus or Leviticus," then what are you? The Christian Bible is both the OT and NT and we're instructed to live our lives according to its teachings.

There's the God of Abraham who is followed by Jews, Christians and Muslims. The difference is in the scripture and interpretation (among many other things).

And saying the Sabbath is only important to the "practicing Israelites/Jews/Prostelytes" is probably one of the most ridiculous statements in this thread - which is saying a lot. I'm sure you meant to say something else, because surely Catholics, Protestants and Muslims keep holy the Sabbath. I know quite a few old timers that will not do anything on a Sunday b/c it's a day of rest.
Unless you are an Israelite, your ancestors most certainly did not live under the 5 books of moses, not one of them, or mine, or an other non-Jewish person ... pretty straight forward.

Christians worship a god of the Israelites that they never knew, and don't want to understand. What they/we really worship is the 3 headed god of Constantine's Roman Universal Church. The Jesus God, even thought that name is only 500 years old or so. ..

The Sabbath is and always was Saturday, the day of the God who declared his name as Yehovah.
Sunday is some christian "lords day", the lord of the imagination perhaps. It is the first day of the week, not the 7th. It always has been and always will be.

The Christian bible is both the old testament, when it is useful, and the new testament in all of it manipulated scriptures.
The Israelite scriptures was only the old testament, which is called the Tanakh by them.

Don't ever think that the Messiah EVER quoted from the NT my friend because it never happened.

The God of Abraham never made a covenant with us, unless you have a chapter and verse you would like to share with the class?

P.S. the God of Abraham is only understood by the people who are declared his people in the OT, by Him.

Israelites, Christians, and Muslims most certainly do not worship the same gods, look at their belief systems.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Wow..there's so much wrong in here. Just so much. Jesus isn't a God. It's obvious you don't understand the Trinity (which isn't surprising, it's difficult to grasp.) Mohammad isn't a God. I've said it 3 times b/c it's true: Jews, Christians and Muslims worship the same God - The God of Abraham. Their belief systems may be different, but that doesn't negate the fact that they all stem from the same belief system. You are forgetting where Islam came from. You are ignoring or not knowing the connection between Abraham and Islam. The connection between Abraham and Muhammad. Muhammad, as he claims, was sent to CONFIRM the teachings of Abraham, Moses, Jesus and other prophets. The angel Gabriel spoke to him (Yes, the same Gabriel from the OT and NT)

I won't continue b/c there is just so much wrong information here and I'm going to take the small leap and assume that nothing I could say, or prove to you, will change your beliefs. You really need to educate yourself on the Abrahamic religions. Research them OUTSIDE of whatever religion you practice.


What "religion" do you belong to? Because you have a gross misunderstanding of Judaism and Christianity.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Post Reply