Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Political discussions
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 11045
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by ∞∞∞ »

Ibanez wrote: But to amend something just so you can get an ideological majority on the bench isn't very democratic.
So if the People vote enough progressive Congressman to enact progressive laws, do you think it's democratic that five conservative judges are able to hold back those laws? Personally I think it's even more undemocratic, since it's essentially past generations holding back how a new society wants to govern itself.

Even today, I think the SCOTUS is a complete farce to how a good democracy works. It's one of the things the founders got wrong that other nations have since improved on.

Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 53602
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by Ibanez »

∞∞∞ wrote:
Ibanez wrote: But to amend something just so you can get an ideological majority on the bench isn't very democratic.
So if the People vote enough progressive Congressman to enact progressive laws, do you think it's democratic that five conservative judges are able to hold back those laws? Personally I think it's even more undemocratic, since it's essentially past generations holding back how a new society wants to govern itself.

Even today, I think the SCOTUS is a complete farce to how a good democracy works. It's one of the things the founders got wrong that other nations have since improved on.
If you want to change the term limits of a justice, then do it.

Be honest, you would want to maintain a progressive court if a conservative Congress enacted conservative laws which were held up by progressive judges. So, you're hypothetical situation here shows that you want want's best for YOUR ideas and nobody else's. Which to me isn't democratic.

Besides, we've had conservative judges side over and over with the liberal judges. There are good judges that don't view everything through a Red of Blue lens. And the ones that judge with an obvious biased usually get those cases overturned.


You seem to think government should be perfect. We're a very diverse culture and our politics are messy because of it.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17

∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 11045
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by ∞∞∞ »

Ibanez wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: So if the People vote enough progressive Congressman to enact progressive laws, do you think it's democratic that five conservative judges are able to hold back those laws? Personally I think it's even more undemocratic, since it's essentially past generations holding back how a new society wants to govern itself.

Even today, I think the SCOTUS is a complete farce to how a good democracy works. It's one of the things the founders got wrong that other nations have since improved on.
If you want to change the term limits of a justice, then do it.
How is this statement any different than:

If you want to change the amount of justices, then do it.

They're both perfectly acceptable ways to an end if the People want.
You seem to think government should be perfect. We're a very diverse culture and our politics are messy because of it
I know it's messy, but the entire point of humanity is to perfect the species as best as possible. This includes government. Just because anything's messy it doesn't mean we go, "well it's messy and that's how it is."

We should leave this Earth better off than we enter it.

User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 53400
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by AZGrizFan »

∞∞∞ wrote:
Ibanez wrote: If you want to change the term limits of a justice, then do it.
How is this statement any different than:

If you want to change the amount of justices, then do it.

They're both perfectly acceptable ways to an end if the People want.
You seem to think government should be perfect. We're a very diverse culture and our politics are messy because of it
I know it's messy, but the entire point of humanity is to perfect the species as best as possible. This includes government. Just because anything's messy it doesn't mean we go, "well it's messy and that's how it is."

We should leave this Earth better off than we enter it.
Dems are fucking comical. Don't get your way? Fuck it, just change the rules! :dunce: :dunce: :dunce:

Can't get your SC nomination through the Senate? USE THE NUCLEAR OPTION!!
Didn't win the presidential election? ABOLISH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE!
Can't stop a SC nomination? ADD ADDITIONAL PROGRESSIVE SEATS TO OFFSET THE MAJORITY!!

You are the epitome of the "participation trophy" generation. This is what happens when people grow up having NEVER "lost" at anything in their life. Having always gotten their way. Having been told their entire lives they're better, smarter, faster than everybody else and having been given a trophy whether they deserved it or not.

Y'all are fucking :loko: :loko:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image

Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 53602
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by Ibanez »

∞∞∞ wrote:
Ibanez wrote: If you want to change the term limits of a justice, then do it.
How is this statement any different than:

If you want to change the amount of justices, then do it.

They're both perfectly acceptable ways to an end if the People want.
You seem to think government should be perfect. We're a very diverse culture and our politics are messy because of it
I know it's messy, but the entire point of humanity is to perfect the species as best as possible. This includes government. Just because anything's messy it doesn't mean we go, "well it's messy and that's how it is."

We should leave this Earth better off than we enter it.
Changing the term limits is very different than changing the number of people on the court. If there's enough bipartisan support to increase the # of judges, then ok.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17

∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 11045
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by ∞∞∞ »

Ibanez wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: How is this statement any different than:

If you want to change the amount of justices, then do it.

They're both perfectly acceptable ways to an end if the People want.


I know it's messy, but the entire point of humanity is to perfect the species as best as possible. This includes government. Just because anything's messy it doesn't mean we go, "well it's messy and that's how it is."

We should leave this Earth better off than we enter it.
Changing the term limits is very different than changing the number of people on the court. If there's enough bipartisan support to increase the # of judges, then ok.
The only way they differ is that one takes a Constitutional change while the other takes a simpler legislative change. But ultimately, both are ways for a society to achieve new goals without undermining what it believes are its democratic values.

Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 53602
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by Ibanez »

∞∞∞ wrote:
Ibanez wrote: If you want to change the term limits of a justice, then do it.
How is this statement any different than:

If you want to change the amount of justices, then do it.

They're both perfectly acceptable ways to an end if the People want.
You seem to think government should be perfect. We're a very diverse culture and our politics are messy because of it
I know it's messy, but the entire point of humanity is to perfect the species as best as possible. This includes government. Just because anything's messy it doesn't mean we go, "well it's messy and that's how it is."

We should leave this Earth better off than we enter it.
Government is messy and it should be. It will never be perfect and most attempts to create a perfect government/society/world has usually ended up terrible. Utopias are un-achievable. That isn't to say we don't strive for it. We should be bettering ourselves. But bettering yourself at the expense of others USUALLY doesn't turn out well in the end. :twocents:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17

Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 53602
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by Ibanez »

∞∞∞ wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
Changing the term limits is very different than changing the number of people on the court. If there's enough bipartisan support to increase the # of judges, then ok.
The only way they differ is that one takes a Constitutional change while the other takes a simpler legislative change. But ultimately, both are ways for a society to achieve new goals without undermining what it believes are its democratic values.
Like I said - if the people want to change it through a democratic process then so be it.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17

User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by Pwns »

∞∞∞ wrote:
Pwns wrote:So, someone want to explain to me how using emergency declaration to do what congress won't let you do is an abuse of power, but expanding the SCOTUS because you don't like the judges isn't?
Did you read the article? They don't want to do it with an "emergency declaration." If Democrats hold the house and have 60 votes in the Senate to change the statute, it's happening (as it should).

It's a rallying cause to win the Presidency, House, and Senate.
I didn't say it will be done via emergency declaration. I'm trying to figure out what the difference is between expanding the court and what Trump is doing with the national emergency (besides that one is unprecedented, but does that make it right?)
We get the government we deserve. :nod:

User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35781
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by Grizalltheway »

Pwns wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: Did you read the article? They don't want to do it with an "emergency declaration." If Democrats hold the house and have 60 votes in the Senate to change the statute, it's happening (as it should).

It's a rallying cause to win the Presidency, House, and Senate.
I didn't say it will be done via emergency declaration. I'm trying to figure out what the difference is between expanding the court and what Trump is doing with the national emergency (besides that one is unprecedented, but does that make it right?)
We've already discussed what the difference is. :?
Last edited by Grizalltheway on Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 11045
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by ∞∞∞ »

Ibanez wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: How is this statement any different than:

If you want to change the amount of justices, then do it.

They're both perfectly acceptable ways to an end if the People want.


I know it's messy, but the entire point of humanity is to perfect the species as best as possible. This includes government. Just because anything's messy it doesn't mean we go, "well it's messy and that's how it is."

We should leave this Earth better off than we enter it.
Government is messy and it should be. It will never be perfect and most attempts to create a perfect government/society/world has usually ended up terrible. Utopias are un-achievable. That isn't to say we don't strive for it. We should be bettering ourselves. But bettering yourself at the expense of others USUALLY doesn't turn out well in the end. :twocents:
I don't disagree. Usually is the key word though; there are times where it's necessary not just for the betterment of yourself, but of society as a whole.

Additionally, you can't simply dismiss a Utopian society as unachievable. It likely won't be in our lifetimes, but future humans could certainly do it (ex. humans evolving with tech to become a hive-mind species). But us thinking about how a Utopian society would come to fruition is like the ancient Sumerians trying to understand how an entire world can be connected in milliseconds. That is, we'll never know.

It's a fun thought-exercise though. And it's worth striving for.

∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 11045
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by ∞∞∞ »

Pwns wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: Did you read the article? They don't want to do it with an "emergency declaration." If Democrats hold the house and have 60 votes in the Senate to change the statute, it's happening (as it should).

It's a rallying cause to win the Presidency, House, and Senate.
I didn't say it will be done via emergency declaration. I'm trying to figure out what the difference is between expanding the court and what Trump is doing with the national emergency (besides that one is unprecedented, but does that make it right?)
One is a single individual surpassing the authority given to him by the contract he swore an oath to. And no one in his party giving a sh*t beyond symbolic finger-wagging.

One is hundreds of thousands of constituents telling their reps that they want something changed and said reps changing it with the full authority of the contract they swore an oath to.

User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 55213
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by 93henfan »

Utopian societies will never work, because people are never truly equal in them. Somebody pulls the strings, and that somebody is always going to look out for #1.

And then if #1 is sniffed out and executed, #2 becomes #1. Rinse and repeat.

It's just human nature. To make us different, in whatever techno-BS you mentioned, you'd have to make us not human.
"Hell yes we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47." - Beta O'Rourke

User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by Pwns »

∞∞∞ wrote:
One is hundreds of thousands of constituents telling their reps that they want something changed and said reps changing it with the full authority of the contract they swore an oath to.
Trump elected himself?

And an emergency declaration isn't within the president's authority?
We get the government we deserve. :nod:

∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 11045
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by ∞∞∞ »

93henfan wrote:Utopian societies will never work, because people are never truly equal in them. Somebody pulls the strings, and that somebody is always going to look out for #1.

And then if #1 is sniffed out and executed, #2 becomes #1. Rinse and repeat.
It's natural to approach the concept from the collective human experience up to this point in time (as you did) and predict it'll never work, but if one arises, it'll be from an interconnection of events, technology, biological changes, etc. that we can't really imagine today.

User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 13032
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by Skjellyfetti »

Pwns wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote:
One is hundreds of thousands of constituents telling their reps that they want something changed and said reps changing it with the full authority of the contract they swore an oath to.
Trump elected himself?

And an emergency declaration isn't within the president's authority?
Not to avoid going through Congress to request $$.

The Constitution is pretty clear about appropriation.
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
Cid1990 wrote:It is going to be a sad day for a lot of people when all that comes of all of this is Flynn getting whacked.

Mueller is going to take a beating on the left before this business is over

User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 55213
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by 93henfan »

∞∞∞ wrote:
93henfan wrote:Utopian societies will never work, because people are never truly equal in them. Somebody pulls the strings, and that somebody is always going to look out for #1.

And then if #1 is sniffed out and executed, #2 becomes #1. Rinse and repeat.
It's natural to approach the concept from the collective human experience up to this point in time (as you did) and predict it'll never work, but if one arises, it'll be from an interconnection of events, technology, biological changes, etc. that we can't really imagine today.
I know you mean well, but that sort of talk always reminds me of this fella:

Image
"Hell yes we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47." - Beta O'Rourke

User avatar
Col Hogan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 11647
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:29 am
I am a fan of: William & Mary
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by Col Hogan »

93henfan wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: It's natural to approach the concept from the collective human experience up to this point in time (as you did) and predict it'll never work, but if one arises, it'll be from an interconnection of events, technology, biological changes, etc. that we can't really imagine today.
I know you mean well, but that sort of talk always reminds me of this fella:

Image
:clap: :clap: :clap:
“Tolerance and Apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.” Aristotle

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 45965
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by kalm »

AZGrizFan wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: How is this statement any different than:

If you want to change the amount of justices, then do it.

They're both perfectly acceptable ways to an end if the People want.


I know it's messy, but the entire point of humanity is to perfect the species as best as possible. This includes government. Just because anything's messy it doesn't mean we go, "well it's messy and that's how it is."

We should leave this Earth better off than we enter it.
Dems are fucking comical. Don't get your way? Fuck it, just change the rules! :dunce: :dunce: :dunce:

Can't get your SC nomination through the Senate? USE THE NUCLEAR OPTION!!
Didn't win the presidential election? ABOLISH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE!
Can't stop a SC nomination? ADD ADDITIONAL PROGRESSIVE SEATS TO OFFSET THE MAJORITY!!

You are the epitome of the "participation trophy" generation. This is what happens when people grow up having NEVER "lost" at anything in their life. Having always gotten their way. Having been told their entire lives they're better, smarter, faster than everybody else and having been given a trophy whether they deserved it or not.

Y'all are fucking :loko: :loko:
I earned every fucking trophy I ever won and Trip is right at least part of the time.

Your argument is invalid.


:kissass:
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 23500
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by CID1990 »

Chizzang wrote:The Majestic Ponderosa...

Image
It was nice of the loggers to make that clearing so we can see the waterfall


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris

User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 23500
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by CID1990 »

∞∞∞ wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
Utopian pablum garbage

You peddle the same misery and hate mongering everybody else does, albeit from a less rational direction

Same thought process as evangelicals


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris

Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 24881
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by Ivytalk »

∞∞∞ wrote:
93henfan wrote:Utopian societies will never work, because people are never truly equal in them. Somebody pulls the strings, and that somebody is always going to look out for #1.

And then if #1 is sniffed out and executed, #2 becomes #1. Rinse and repeat.
It's natural to approach the concept from the collective human experience up to this point in time (as you did) and predict it'll never work, but if one arises, it'll be from an interconnection of events, technology, biological changes, etc. that we can't really imagine today.
Thanks, Dr. Kaku. :coffee:
“I’m just dealing with reality.” — JohnStOnge 12/19/19

User avatar
css75
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2512
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2018 10:45 pm

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by css75 »

AZGrizFan wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: How is this statement any different than:

If you want to change the amount of justices, then do it.

They're both perfectly acceptable ways to an end if the People want.


I know it's messy, but the entire point of humanity is to perfect the species as best as possible. This includes government. Just because anything's messy it doesn't mean we go, "well it's messy and that's how it is."

We should leave this Earth better off than we enter it.
Dems are **** comical. Don't get your way? **** it, just change the rules! :dunce: :dunce: :dunce:

Can't get your SC nomination through the Senate? USE THE NUCLEAR OPTION!!
Didn't win the presidential election? ABOLISH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE!
Can't stop a SC nomination? ADD ADDITIONAL PROGRESSIVE SEATS TO OFFSET THE MAJORITY!!

You are the epitome of the "participation trophy" generation. This is what happens when people grow up having NEVER "lost" at anything in their life. Having always gotten their way. Having been told their entire lives they're better, smarter, faster than everybody else and having been given a trophy whether they deserved it or not.

Y'all are **** :loko: :loko:
You stated that quite well.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7776
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
A.K.A.: Unification88
Location: On the foggy woggy banks of the Limpopo River

Re: RE: Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by UNI88 »

∞∞∞ wrote:
93henfan wrote:Utopian societies will never work, because people are never truly equal in them. Somebody pulls the strings, and that somebody is always going to look out for #1.

And then if #1 is sniffed out and executed, #2 becomes #1. Rinse and repeat.
It's natural to approach the concept from the collective human experience up to this point in time (as you did) and predict it'll never work, but if one arises, it'll be from an interconnection of events, technology, biological changes, etc. that we can't really imagine today.
And then we "will be assimilated."

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 13032
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

Post by Skjellyfetti »

Snowflake :rofl:

Devin Nunes Sues Twitter for Allowing Accounts to Insult Him
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/19/us/p ... wsuit.html
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
Cid1990 wrote:It is going to be a sad day for a lot of people when all that comes of all of this is Flynn getting whacked.

Mueller is going to take a beating on the left before this business is over

Post Reply