I appreciate your ability to express this sentiment. I don't think I will be a third party guy this time but can't say for sure at this point.AZGrizFan wrote:I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.89Hen wrote: Really? So telling folks to "have a spine" isn't telling folks that it's somehow brave to vote that way? Yeah, OK.
Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.
But hey, you do you bro.
April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
-
- Maroon Supporter
- Posts: 21613
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
-
- Maroon Supporter
- Posts: 21613
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
They are not and that is why it is a home run.kalm wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.
Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.
But hey, you do you bro.
And nothing changes.
It’s like the old Yogi Berra line...if you don’t go to other people’s funerals they won’t go to yours.
(I’m actually not sure if the two concepts are alike at all but since I’m quoting Z it seemed like a good fit here )
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
Then why don't they? They're free to send in a check any time they want...93henfan wrote:A temporary win that increased the federal debt. That'll completely screw over our kids. Some day, the reckoning is coming to all of us for Trump's corporate and billionaire welfare program.AZGrizFan wrote:
Stack up the tax cut against the "pay freeze". See if you came out ahead.
Pretty much every billionaire out there (Gates, Buffett, etc) will tell you that they should be paying more and not less taxes for the long term health of the country.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- GannonFan
- Level5
- Posts: 18132
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
I'm not casting a vote for Beto (dumb as bricks) or for Warren (too old and really more of a Senator than President), and certainly not for Trump (buffoon). Sanders I'm up in the air on - I would've voted for him last time, and would probably do so again. Depends on the makeup of Congress, though. Voting for him last time wouldn't have been a problem, he'd never would've gotten any of his more crazy ideas through Congress. I don't think the Senate is going Democratic this time around, but it could be close, so now he's more of a risk. Besides, he's old, so when push comes to shove, I'm voting for a younger person.mainejeff wrote:Possible crazies....Sanders, Beto, Warren. I'd vote for all of them over the insane Trump.GannonFan wrote:Well, I'm not voting Trump, so it's the Democrat unless they're crazy, but that could be likely, so I don't see the option clearly defined.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
You're joking, right? Voting for either party is throwing away your vote, even though one of them will win? Whereas voting third party is not a waste, even though your vote will be going to somebody who will get maybe 5% of the vote in a good year?AZGrizFan wrote:I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.89Hen wrote: Really? So telling folks to "have a spine" isn't telling folks that it's somehow brave to vote that way? Yeah, OK.
Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.
But hey, you do you bro.
And voting your conscience is only if they vote how you say they should vote?
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
I thought you were more or less of a centrist. Your position makes no sense. You’d vote for Sanders only if you are convinced that none of his “more crazy ideas” would be enacted into law. Got it. Also, please let us know what his “less crazy ideas” are, beyond conventional Donk stuff.GannonFan wrote:I'm not casting a vote for Beto (dumb as bricks) or for Warren (too old and really more of a Senator than President), and certainly not for Trump (buffoon). Sanders I'm up in the air on - I would've voted for him last time, and would probably do so again. Depends on the makeup of Congress, though. Voting for him last time wouldn't have been a problem, he'd never would've gotten any of his more crazy ideas through Congress. I don't think the Senate is going Democratic this time around, but it could be close, so now he's more of a risk. Besides, he's old, so when push comes to shove, I'm voting for a younger person.mainejeff wrote:
Possible crazies....Sanders, Beto, Warren. I'd vote for all of them over the insane Trump.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
- GannonFan
- Level5
- Posts: 18132
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
I am a centrist - that ties in fine with a President that would have to work with an opposing party in Congress to advance their ideas. Ideally, a more left-ward leaning President would be brought closer to the center by a right-wing based Congress that would also have to tack more towards the center and the net result of compromise would be something towards the middle. Worst case, gridlock, which for all of its faults doesn't really lean left or right - again, stuck in the middle. Makes perfect sense if you think on it.Ivytalk wrote:I thought you were more or less of a centrist. Your position makes no sense. You’d vote for Sanders only if you are convinced that none of his “more crazy ideas” would be enacted into law. Got it. Also, please let us know what his “less crazy ideas” are, beyond conventional Donk stuff.GannonFan wrote:
I'm not casting a vote for Beto (dumb as bricks) or for Warren (too old and really more of a Senator than President), and certainly not for Trump (buffoon). Sanders I'm up in the air on - I would've voted for him last time, and would probably do so again. Depends on the makeup of Congress, though. Voting for him last time wouldn't have been a problem, he'd never would've gotten any of his more crazy ideas through Congress. I don't think the Senate is going Democratic this time around, but it could be close, so now he's more of a risk. Besides, he's old, so when push comes to shove, I'm voting for a younger person.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
If you say so.GannonFan wrote:I am a centrist - that ties in fine with a President that would have to work with an opposing party in Congress to advance their ideas. Ideally, a more left-ward leaning President would be brought closer to the center by a right-wing based Congress that would also have to tack more towards the center and the net result of compromise would be something towards the middle. Worst case, gridlock, which for all of its faults doesn't really lean left or right - again, stuck in the middle. Makes perfect sense if you think on it.Ivytalk wrote: I thought you were more or less of a centrist. Your position makes no sense. You’d vote for Sanders only if you are convinced that none of his “more crazy ideas” would be enacted into law. Got it. Also, please let us know what his “less crazy ideas” are, beyond conventional Donk stuff.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
Jesus, you're being exceptionally dense today.89Hen wrote:You're joking, right? Voting for either party is throwing away your vote, even though one of them will win? Whereas voting third party is not a waste, even though your vote will be going to somebody who will get maybe 5% of the vote in a good year?AZGrizFan wrote:
I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.
Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.
But hey, you do you bro.
And voting your conscience is only if they vote how you say they should vote?
It's throwing away your vote because in the long run it DOES. NOT. MATTER. If either of the major party candidates win, it's same ol' same ol'....wanting change and then voting for the same thing over and over again...the definition of insanity. Again, is that REALLY that difficult of a concept to grasp?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45610
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
AZGrizFan wrote:Jesus, you're being exceptionally dense today.89Hen wrote: You're joking, right? Voting for either party is throwing away your vote, even though one of them will win? Whereas voting third party is not a waste, even though your vote will be going to somebody who will get maybe 5% of the vote in a good year?
And voting your conscience is only if they vote how you say they should vote?
It's throwing away your vote because in the long run it DOES. NOT. MATTER. If either of the major party candidates win, it's same ol' same ol'....wanting change and then voting for the same thing over and over again...the definition of insanity. Again, is that REALLY that difficult of a concept to grasp?
Jesus playing 2nd base for the Grizzlies this past weekend. The other Jesus played outfield, along with my Angels. Joseph was both the pitcher and the catcher. As for the Virgin Mary, no virgins on my team.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
I bet he was.dbackjon wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
Jesus, you're being exceptionally dense today.
It's throwing away your vote because in the long run it DOES. NOT. MATTER. If either of the major party candidates win, it's same ol' same ol'....wanting change and then voting for the same thing over and over again...the definition of insanity. Again, is that REALLY that difficult of a concept to grasp?
Jesus playing 2nd base for the Grizzlies this past weekend. The other Jesus played outfield, along with my Angels. Joseph was both the pitcher and the catcher. As for the Virgin Mary, no virgins on my team.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28257
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
Have to disagree with you there. I don’t think a Clinton admin would have done/be doing the same policy wise as the Trump admin. Sure, there’s some areas where the only difference is the rhetoric, but other areas where there is a HUGE difference.AZGrizFan wrote:I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.89Hen wrote: Really? So telling folks to "have a spine" isn't telling folks that it's somehow brave to vote that way? Yeah, OK.
Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.
But hey, you do you bro.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
- Winterborn
- Supporter
- Posts: 8812
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 2:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Beer and Diesel Pickups
- Location: Wherever I hang my hat
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
Only difference is in how long it is going to take before complete governmental control. D's will just get there quicker, but make no mistake the R's will wind up in the same spot. They are using the past voting record of the Republican name as a smoke screen. If you look at them in light of how they would compare to R's 15-20+ years ago, they would of been Democrats back then.BDKJMU wrote: Have to disagree with you there. I don’t think a Clinton admin would have done/be doing the same policy wise as the Trump admin. Sure, there’s some areas where the only difference is the rhetoric, but other areas where there is a HUGE difference.
Sure there are a few that have held the course or have certain values that line up the same, but they are few and far between.
“The best of all things is to learn. Money can be lost or stolen, health and strength may fail, but what you have committed to your mind is yours forever.” – Louis L’Amour
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.” - G. Michael Hopf
"I am neither especially clever nor especially gifted. I am only very, very curious.” – Albert Einstein
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.” - G. Michael Hopf
"I am neither especially clever nor especially gifted. I am only very, very curious.” – Albert Einstein
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59750
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
Not economically. R’s 15 years ago were spending trillions on a war of choose, while cutting taxes, and enough of them getting ready to support Medicare Part D.Winterborn wrote:Only difference is in how long it is going to take before complete governmental control. D's will just get there quicker, but make no mistake the R's will wind up in the same spot. They are using the past voting record of the Republican name as a smoke screen. If you look at them in light of how they would compare to R's 15-20+ years ago, they would of been Democrats back then.BDKJMU wrote: Have to disagree with you there. I don’t think a Clinton admin would have done/be doing the same policy wise as the Trump admin. Sure, there’s some areas where the only difference is the rhetoric, but other areas where there is a HUGE difference.
Sure there are a few that have held the course or have certain values that line up the same, but they are few and far between.
- Winterborn
- Supporter
- Posts: 8812
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 2:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Beer and Diesel Pickups
- Location: Wherever I hang my hat
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
My bad, too early. They had already started to turn.kalm wrote:Not economically. R’s 15 years ago were spending trillions on a war of choose, while cutting taxes, and enough of them getting ready to support Medicare Part D.Winterborn wrote:
Only difference is in how long it is going to take before complete governmental control. D's will just get there quicker, but make no mistake the R's will wind up in the same spot. They are using the past voting record of the Republican name as a smoke screen. If you look at them in light of how they would compare to R's 15-20+ years ago, they would of been Democrats back then.
Sure there are a few that have held the course or have certain values that line up the same, but they are few and far between.
“The best of all things is to learn. Money can be lost or stolen, health and strength may fail, but what you have committed to your mind is yours forever.” – Louis L’Amour
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.” - G. Michael Hopf
"I am neither especially clever nor especially gifted. I am only very, very curious.” – Albert Einstein
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.” - G. Michael Hopf
"I am neither especially clever nor especially gifted. I am only very, very curious.” – Albert Einstein
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59750
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
No worries. I was still voting most Democratic back then too.Winterborn wrote:My bad, too early. They had already started to turn.kalm wrote:
Not economically. R’s 15 years ago were spending trillions on a war of choose, while cutting taxes, and enough of them getting ready to support Medicare Part D.
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 20457
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
FYPmainejeff wrote:Possible crazies....Sanders, Beto, Warren, Che, Stalin, Mao. I'd vote for all of them over the insane Trump.GannonFan wrote:Well, I'm not voting Trump, so it's the Democrat unless they're crazy, but that could be likely, so I don't see the option clearly defined.
To answer Jon's question, I would consider Buttigieg based on limited knowledge at this time but I'm not sure about D's that aren't running.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 30958
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
I think it's perfect timing to put a woman in the White House, now that it won't be Hillary. Dems have a few good options at this point.
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59750
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
Maybe but I couldn’t care less about gender, skin color, sexual persuasion, etc. Since I’m in a safe space, I will say that women of the 2 or 3 generations currently in their political prime have overseen a massive feminization of America and not all of it is good.Gil Dobie wrote:I think it's perfect timing to put a woman in the White House, now that it won't be Hillary. Dems have a few good options at this point.
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 30958
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
..and the male domination has not exactly all been good either. There have been some great world leaders of the opposite sex.kalm wrote:Maybe but I couldn’t care less about gender, skin color, sexual persuasion, etc. Since I’m in a safe space, I will say that women of the 2 or 3 generations currently in their political prime have overseen a massive feminization of America and not all of it is good.Gil Dobie wrote:I think it's perfect timing to put a woman in the White House, now that it won't be Hillary. Dems have a few good options at this point.
- Pwns
- Level4
- Posts: 7275
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
- A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
My problems with the Democrats:
1. Racial resentment and identity politics. This stuff just makes it easier for the next Donald Trump to win, and leads to policies addressing non-existent problems like the alleged racial bias in police killings and school discipline.
2. I want a "too big to fail, too big to exist" policy for the mega banks. This should be a bipartisan issue. Granted Warren and Bernie have talked about this but I'm pretty sure Joe Biden's going to let them regulate themselves in exchange for a half-million dollar speech.
3. Environmental policy that has a minimal effect on the problems they're designed to solve that just make everyone's energy costs go up and causes other problems.
4. Immigration policy that works more for the Democrat party than for America. Not like it's not the same thing with the GOP, but the donks are much worse.
I'm not that afraid of the economic left at least right now, but with the current crop of donks it's very hard to not vote third party or independent.
1. Racial resentment and identity politics. This stuff just makes it easier for the next Donald Trump to win, and leads to policies addressing non-existent problems like the alleged racial bias in police killings and school discipline.
2. I want a "too big to fail, too big to exist" policy for the mega banks. This should be a bipartisan issue. Granted Warren and Bernie have talked about this but I'm pretty sure Joe Biden's going to let them regulate themselves in exchange for a half-million dollar speech.
3. Environmental policy that has a minimal effect on the problems they're designed to solve that just make everyone's energy costs go up and causes other problems.
4. Immigration policy that works more for the Democrat party than for America. Not like it's not the same thing with the GOP, but the donks are much worse.
I'm not that afraid of the economic left at least right now, but with the current crop of donks it's very hard to not vote third party or independent.
Last edited by Pwns on Wed Apr 17, 2019 7:15 am, edited 2 times in total.
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
Tomato tomahto. They both want to spend us into oblivion. They both spy on innocent Americans and don't call it spying. They both are only concerned about staying in power and not what's best for the country. Neither want to solve the political footballs because then they couldn't rile up the single issue mouthbreathers to come out and vote. Their proclaimed "differences" are merely a mirage. They're 90% the same and 10% different rhetoric.BDKJMU wrote:Have to disagree with you there. I don’t think a Clinton admin would have done/be doing the same policy wise as the Trump admin. Sure, there’s some areas where the only difference is the rhetoric, but other areas where there is a HUGE difference.AZGrizFan wrote:
I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.
Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.
But hey, you do you bro.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- ALPHAGRIZ1
- Level5
- Posts: 16077
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
- I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
- A.K.A.: Fuck Off
- Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis
Re: RE: Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
Exactly oneGil Dobie wrote:..and the male domination has not exactly all been good either. There have been some great world leaders of the opposite sex.kalm wrote:
Maybe but I couldn’t care less about gender, skin color, sexual persuasion, etc. Since I’m in a safe space, I will say that women of the 2 or 3 generations currently in their political prime have overseen a massive feminization of America and not all of it is good.
(Thatcher)
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black
The flat earth society has members all around the globe
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28257
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
You think with Clinton we would have had:AZGrizFan wrote:Tomato tomahto. They both want to spend us into oblivion. They both spy on innocent Americans and don't call it spying. They both are only concerned about staying in power and not what's best for the country. Neither want to solve the political footballs because then they couldn't rile up the single issue mouthbreathers to come out and vote. Their proclaimed "differences" are merely a mirage. They're 90% the same and 10% different rhetoric.BDKJMU wrote: Have to disagree with you there. I don’t think a Clinton admin would have done/be doing the same policy wise as the Trump admin. Sure, there’s some areas where the only difference is the rhetoric, but other areas where there is a HUGE difference.
-2 SCOTUS nominations similar to Gorsuch and Kavanough + numerous conservative Circuit nominations
-Tax cuts
-Similar on Illegal Immigration
-Ending Obamacare mandate
-Similar on Deregulation
-Renegotiating NAFTA
-Similar on China.
-Nixing the terrible Iran Deal.
-Pulling out of the Paris Climate deal.
-Getting deadbeat NATO countries to pledge to pay more.
-Pulling out Syria
-Opening dialogue with North Korea
And those are just the differences off the top of my head. I don’t think with Clinton would have had the above. Big difference between the 2.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 30958
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: RE: Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll
Gandhi, Golda Meir, Cleopatra, Catherine the Great, Elizabeth I, Isabella I, etcALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Exactly oneGil Dobie wrote:
..and the male domination has not exactly all been good either. There have been some great world leaders of the opposite sex.
(Thatcher)
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk