∞∞∞ wrote:CID1990 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 1:14 am
^^^^ this is you in a nutshell Treep
You don’t understand the concept of how benefits are earned
A soldier doesn't contribute any more to society than a janitor, farmer, teacher, construction worker, etc.
And I'm not saying soldiers didn't earn their benefits; they do. I'm simply saying jobs heavily regulated and/or overseen by government are better off than capitalist laissez faire policies that many here love to embrace.
You and AZ are examples of how society (government) gains long-term benefits when it invests in its people. The military isn't special...society needs doctors and teachers and engineers and artists and athletes and merchants and so on.
I’ve got news for you fella
The government invested very little in this guy.. I came to State with a couple degrees, and basically a bunch of cop experience (about the cheapest gov investment out there)..
And then they slapped a few weeks of orientation and consular training on me, and that’s it.
The military ain’t a whole lot different unless you are flying gazillion dollar airplanes. I got 8 weeks of boot camp, a couple months of electronic warfare training, and then off to sea. It is rare that our government “invests” large sums in anybody. High level operators, but that’s like less than a half percent of the Fed workforce.
A lot of people like to say our military is the best trained in the world... that’s a load of crap. Our military is the best equipped in the world but I can count 15 countries off the too of my head who train their militaries better.
The government does not attract the best people as a rule. The get some good ones, but that’s the luck of the draw. And most people who come on board made themselves employable after years of school and life experience. People invest in themselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk