Well, those would be the ones most deserving of a bailout under these circumstances. Not that I'm a proponent of TBTF or bailouts in general.
Reinforce success. Punish failure (or at least don't subsidize it).

Well, those would be the ones most deserving of a bailout under these circumstances. Not that I'm a proponent of TBTF or bailouts in general.


So define sound decisions...CitadelGrad wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:57 amWell, those would be the ones most deserving of a bailout under these circumstances. Not that I'm a proponent of TBTF or bailouts in general.
Reinforce success. Punish failure (or at least don't subsidize it).

Pretty much anything that would fall under the “business judgment rule” standard, which is gross negligence under DE law. It’s designed to protect corporate officers and directors from the consequences of taking rational business risks. Is this enough, or do you want a JoltinJoe-length treatise?kalm wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:06 amSo define sound decisions...CitadelGrad wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:57 am
Well, those would be the ones most deserving of a bailout under these circumstances. Not that I'm a proponent of TBTF or bailouts in general.
Reinforce success. Punish failure (or at least don't subsidize it).


I’m only getting started!Ivytalk wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:18 amPretty much anything that would fall under the “business judgment rule” standard, which is gross negligence under DE law. It’s designed to protect corporate officers and directors from the consequences of taking rational business risks. Is this enough, or do you want a JoltinJoe-length treatise?![]()

You used that term. I didn't. You define it.kalm wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:06 amSo define sound decisions...CitadelGrad wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:57 am
Well, those would be the ones most deserving of a bailout under these circumstances. Not that I'm a proponent of TBTF or bailouts in general.
Reinforce success. Punish failure (or at least don't subsidize it).


Actually Ivy brought up the point. I was just replying. You don’t have to answer it if you don’t want to. It’s a trap anyway.

You’re at it again. Actually, I should delete the word “rational” from my post. It doesn’t really add anything under the gross negligence standard. Now you answer my question.kalm wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:00 amI’m only getting started!Ivytalk wrote: ↑Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:18 am
Pretty much anything that would fall under the “business judgment rule” standard, which is gross negligence under DE law. It’s designed to protect corporate officers and directors from the consequences of taking rational business risks. Is this enough, or do you want a JoltinJoe-length treatise?![]()
Define “rational”.