Sensitive Information Leaks to Press

Political discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19037
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Sensitive Information Leaks to Press

Post by SeattleGriz »

Can anyone shed some light on this for me? It seems as if anything and everything is subject to leaks to the media. So, with that being said, how much information is "leaked" on purpose?

Any ideas on this one?
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Sensitive Information Leaks to Press

Post by Cap'n Cat »

SeattleGriz wrote:Can anyone shed some light on this for me? It seems as if anything and everything is subject to leaks to the media. So, with that being said, how much information is "leaked" on purpose?

Any ideas on this one?
I am going to guess about 95%+. Leaks elicit early indicators of mood and potential reaction.
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Sensitive Information Leaks to Press

Post by Gil Dobie »

Need more leaks from the steroid list. :o
Image
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19037
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Sensitive Information Leaks to Press

Post by SeattleGriz »

Cap'n Cat wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:Can anyone shed some light on this for me? It seems as if anything and everything is subject to leaks to the media. So, with that being said, how much information is "leaked" on purpose?

Any ideas on this one?
I am going to guess about 95%+. Leaks elicit early indicators of mood and potential reaction.
That all sounds good to me, for how many times have you ever heard about a "leaker" getting busted?
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Sensitive Information Leaks to Press

Post by Cap'n Cat »

SeattleGriz wrote:Can anyone shed some light on this for me? It seems as if anything and everything is subject to leaks to the media. So, with that being said, how much information is "leaked" on purpose?

Any ideas on this one?

Small article on it in Wikipedia, Seattle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_leak
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Sensitive Information Leaks to Press

Post by dbackjon »

Leaks are mostly from the top, IMHO - to gauge moods, etc.
:thumb:
User avatar
TheDancinMonarch
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 4779
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:23 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
Location: Norfolk VA

Re: Sensitive Information Leaks to Press

Post by TheDancinMonarch »

dbackjon wrote:Leaks are mostly from the top, IMHO - to gauge moods, etc.
They are not so much "leaks" as they are "trial balloons".
Image
TwinTownBisonFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7704
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:56 pm
I am a fan of: NDSU
Location: St. Paul, MN

Re: Sensitive Information Leaks to Press

Post by TwinTownBisonFan »

In politics there are basically three kinds of leaks

1. the "oh shit" leak: where someone hits "reply all" or forwards something they aren't supposed to - this happens more than you'd think... the Minnesota Dems just did something like this recently sending a youtube video of a swearing granny in a release...

2. the "this needs to get out, but we can't just do a press release because of the nature of it" leak. this is a lot of the leaking in DC that gets done. a lot of this isn't leaked anymore, but handed to a blogger who does the "word on the wind is..." story.

3. the "i'm trying to undermine my boss" leak - some are for noble reasons, someone doing something unethical or what not... other times it's just a straight up backstab.

I'll say that most "leaks" are the "oh shit" or "needs to get out" type.

I've found leakers in operations i've been a part of... it wasn't pretty when i did. one guy i fired for contacting a reporter (not his job) so... he popped off to a blogger which led to a story, (and they never called us for a comment)... i ran in to him at fundraiser at a bar in town, gave him a good one to the gut and walked out... he never popped off again... (mostly because in MN anyway, that's not normally done and the people he was with were all shocked that someone actually hit someone else...)
North Dakota State University Bison 2011 and 2012 National Champions

Image
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: Sensitive Information Leaks to Press

Post by BlueHen86 »

SeattleGriz wrote:
Cap'n Cat wrote:
I am going to guess about 95%+. Leaks elicit early indicators of mood and potential reaction.
That all sounds good to me, for how many times have you ever heard about a "leaker" getting busted?
Do posts on AGS count? :lol:
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Sensitive Information Leaks to Press

Post by dbackjon »

BlueHen86 wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:
That all sounds good to me, for how many times have you ever heard about a "leaker" getting busted?
Do posts on AGS count? :lol:
:rofl: :rofl:
:thumb:
Post Reply