I am not discussing the certification of the election process, that has been ruled on. What I am interested in is how the Pennsylvania election procedures were changed and in their manner.Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 9:31 amThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court already ruled on it before the election.Winterborn wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 8:32 am
To the best of my knowledge that is correct. I will also add that I have not followed it as closely the past few weeks so something might been done since then.
Work has kept me from doing much research here lately.
The Republican legislature established the voting rules.
The AG doesn't think it violates state law.
The election has been certified.
Not sure how you're wanting it to be handled at the state level.
I really don't care who passed what (both parties are crooked) and the AG's response did not address the root cause of the argument. The absentee ballot issue was ruled on early by the court but the challenge that the the new voting changes were not done per the Pennsylvania constitution has not been resolved yet (to my knowledge, if there is a local (Ganny?) that knows more I would be interested in hearing it). And I am not talking about the weak Trump lawsuits, as that is a different topic.
There are a few threads going on in the four states that are named in the Texas lawsuit that are outside of the election results. They deal with procedural changes in the election process by those states passed under the guise of being necessary due to the current covid conditions.
As far as I am concerned Biden won. I just find it interesting that some changes were done in such a manner that they did not follow the regular guidelines as outlined by the state constitution (as in Pennsylvania).