Yeah that Trump gets off on charges that are 100% political..
Team Trump v/s Everyone
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 29915
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
..But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions.
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 61896
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Oh.
So you’re hoping for a speedy trial after all… to prove his innocence.
High five!
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17200
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
I think we are all for a speedy trial as long as it doesn't infringe on the sixth amendment, especially those using novel legal theories never used in American courts before.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 61896
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
What’s novel is that it pertains to a president. They are not the law. There’s precedent for that already.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 11:03 amI think we are all for a speedy trial as long as it doesn't infringe on the sixth amendment, especially those using novel legal theories never used in American courts before.
And remember, rulings in Trump’s favor on this would also apply to a Democratic president.
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17200
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
What was "obstruction of an official proceeding" used for originally? This is being used against J6 defendants as well.kalm wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 11:31 amWhat’s novel is that it pertains to a president. They are not the law. There’s precedent for that already.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 11:03 am
I think we are all for a speedy trial as long as it doesn't infringe on the sixth amendment, especially those using novel legal theories never used in American courts before.
And remember, rulings in Trump’s favor on this would also apply to a Democratic president.
Late edit: 18 U.S. § 1512(c)(2)
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17200
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Nice projection. Put down the "Mueller She Wrote" twitter feed.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 29915
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
How many times have we seen lefties interrupt Congressional hearings ? Every time that happens that is anSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 12:35 pmWhat was "obstruction of an official proceeding" used for originally? This is being used against J6 defendants as well.
Late edit: 18 U.S. § 1512(c)(2)
‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but they are almost never charged.
Jamaal Bowman pulling a House office building fire alarm in order to stop a Congressional vote was an ‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but he wasn’t charged.
Just goes to show you the J6 political prisoners amd Trump being charged with it by a rabid democrat DC prosecutor and Smith is utter political BS.
Last edited by BDKJMU on Sun Dec 24, 2023 6:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
..But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions.
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22560
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
J6 political prisoners… :roflmao:BDKJMU wrote:How many times have we seen lefties interrupt Congressional hearings ? Every time that happens that is anSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 12:35 pm What was "obstruction of an official proceeding" used for originally? This is being used against J6 defendants as well.
Late edit: 18 U.S. § 1512(c)(2)
‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but they are almost never charged.
Byron’s pulling of a Jamaal Bowman pulling a House office building fire alarm in order to stop a Congressional vote was an ‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but he wasn’t charged.
Just goes to show you the J6 political prisoners amd Trump being charged with it by a rabid democrat DC prosecutor and Smith is utter political BS.
If trump has immunity for everything he did while President then biden could shoot trump dead and claim immunity. That is not a precedent anyone (Republican, Democrat or independent) should want the courts to set.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 29915
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Lol Biden couldn’t hold a gun steady enough..UNI88 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 2:00 pmJ6 political prisoners… :roflmao:BDKJMU wrote: How many times have we seen lefties interrupt Congressional hearings ? Every time that happens that is an
‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but they are almost never charged.
Byron’s pulling of a Jamaal Bowman pulling a House office building fire alarm in order to stop a Congressional vote was an ‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but he wasn’t charged.
Just goes to show you the J6 political prisoners amd Trump being charged with it by a rabid democrat DC prosecutor and Smith is utter political BS.
If trump has immunity for everything he did while President then biden could shoot trump dead and claim immunity. That is not a precedent anyone (Republican, Democrat or independent) should want the courts to set.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
..But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions.
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17200
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Just one small fact you are glossing over, but Presidents are only protected when performing their duties as President. Ensuring election integrity is one and killing someone isn't.UNI88 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 2:00 pmJ6 political prisoners… :roflmao:BDKJMU wrote: How many times have we seen lefties interrupt Congressional hearings ? Every time that happens that is an
‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but they are almost never charged.
Byron’s pulling of a Jamaal Bowman pulling a House office building fire alarm in order to stop a Congressional vote was an ‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but he wasn’t charged.
Just goes to show you the J6 political prisoners amd Trump being charged with it by a rabid democrat DC prosecutor and Smith is utter political BS.
If trump has immunity for everything he did while President then biden could shoot trump dead and claim immunity. That is not a precedent anyone (Republican, Democrat or independent) should want the courts to set.
I'll ask you, what was 18 U.S. § 1512(c)(2) originally used for?
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 61896
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Somebody finally looked up projection to see what it means. Still doesn’t understand it, but tests the waters anyway.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 1:38 pmNice projection. Put down the "Mueller She Wrote" twitter feed.
I’m so proud of you right now!
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 61896
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Great analogies!BDKJMU wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 1:43 pmHow many times have we seen lefties interrupt Congressional hearings ? Every time that happens that is anSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 12:35 pm
What was "obstruction of an official proceeding" used for originally? This is being used against J6 defendants as well.
Late edit: 18 U.S. § 1512(c)(2)
‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but they are almost never charged.
Byron’s pulling of a Jamaal Bowman pulling a House office building fire alarm in order to stop a Congressional vote was an ‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but he wasn’t charged.
Just goes to show you the J6 political prisoners amd Trump being charged with it by a rabid democrat DC prosecutor and Smith is utter political BS.
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22560
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Team Trump v/s Everyone
Making up stories about a stolen election isn’t ensuring election integrity. Inciting a seditious riot isn’t ensuring election integrity. Putting together slates of fraudulent electors isn’t ensuring election integrity. Calling elected officials and attempting to bully them into not certifying results without proof of fraud isn’t ensuring election integrity.SeattleGriz wrote:Just one small fact you are glossing over, but Presidents are only protected when performing their duties as President. Ensuring election integrity is one and killing someone isn't.
I'll ask you, what was 18 U.S. § 1512(c)(2) originally used for?
His actions were the actions of a candidate (a disgruntled, sore loser of a candidate) and should not be considered Presidential duties.
trump himself was the greatest threat to election integrity in 2020 and he is likely to be again in 2024. MAGAt yahoo logic says it’s within the scope of biden’s duties as President to prevent that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk on
Last edited by UNI88 on Sun Dec 24, 2023 3:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22560
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Team Trump v/s Everyone
Double post
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17200
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
It's all you do. Nice try at now deflection. You acting like you care about Justice is golden! Gotta protect your Tribe at all costs.kalm wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 3:03 pmSomebody finally looked up projection to see what it means. Still doesn’t understand it, but tests the waters anyway.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 1:38 pm
Nice projection. Put down the "Mueller She Wrote" twitter feed.
I’m so proud of you right now!
Last edited by SeattleGriz on Sun Dec 24, 2023 5:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17200
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Exposed again. Bro, it came about in 2002 because the Enron case. Evidentiary material was destroyed, and hence, obstructing an official proceeding.UNI88 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 3:57 pmMaking up stories about a stolen election isn’t ensuring election integrity. Inciting a seditious riot isn’t ensuring election integrity. Putting together slates of fraudulent electors isn’t ensuring election integrity. Calling elected officials and attempting to bully them into not certifying results without proof of fraud isn’t ensuring election integrity.SeattleGriz wrote:
Just one small fact you are glossing over, but Presidents are only protected when performing their duties as President. Ensuring election integrity is one and killing someone isn't.
I'll ask you, what was 18 U.S. § 1512(c)(2) originally used for?
His actions were the actions of a candidate (a disgruntled, sore loser of a candidate) and should not be considered Presidential duties.
trump himself was the greatest threat to election integrity in 2020 and he is likely to be again in 2024. MAGAt yahoo logic says it’s within the scope of biden’s duties as President to prevent that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk on
You keep getting your talking points from "Mueller She Wrote" as well apparently. Twitter Lawyer to the rescue. Not an original thought in your response.
Lazy ass.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
-
- Level5
- Posts: 24391
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
I don't need to try - you need to pay attention better.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 10:06 amGeorge Conway and Klams point was that Trump will lose on his decision going to the Supreme Court. I was questioning the fact Conway thought it would only take 3.5 weeks to complete that path. Me thinks George gets paid to say shit like he did.houndawg wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 4:21 am
A more careful reading, (try going just a bit more slowly, sounding out each syllable), will reveal that its actually George Conway who thinks thusly. Not to suggest he knows more about the law, or virology either for that matter, than yourself, just sayin...
I think you need to go back and try again.
Virology is with a capital V.
I won't always be here to help you through life.
Merry Christmas!
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
-
- Level5
- Posts: 24391
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Everyone but him wants a speedy trial - he would waant one too if here weren't guilty as fuck.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 11:03 amI think we are all for a speedy trial as long as it doesn't infringe on the sixth amendment, especially those using novel legal theories never used in American courts before.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17200
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Another MSNBC talking point and total lack of original thought. You're Maddow, UNI is Leftist Hannity and Klam is Reid. The trifecta of worthless gasbagging.houndawg wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 6:37 pmEveryone but him wants a speedy trial - he would waant one too if here weren't guilty as fuck.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 11:03 am
I think we are all for a speedy trial as long as it doesn't infringe on the sixth amendment, especially those using novel legal theories never used in American courts before.
11+ million pages of documents involved in this case, the hundreds (if not thousands) of hours of video and audio, and the hundreds of witnesses, the accelerated trial date was a violation of Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel, which includes the opportunity to prepare for trial.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
-
- Level5
- Posts: 24391
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Its so glaringly obvious that a not guilty verdict before the election would benefit him that even you can see it. So you pour some weak piss about effective assistance as if he hasn't had a whole team of lawyers working on it for years already. Your parents must still have nightmares about that condom failing....SeaGulljizzSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 6:41 pmAnother MSNBC talking point and total lack of original thought. You're Maddow, UNI is Leftist Hannity and Klam is Reid. The trifecta of worthless gasbagging.
11+ million pages of documents involved in this case, the hundreds (if not thousands) of hours of video and audio, and the hundreds of witnesses, the accelerated trial date was a violation of Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel, which includes the opportunity to prepare for trial.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 17200
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Yes Rachel. You've figured out that it not only takes time to actually get the documents from John Smith, but to analyze them as well. Your ratings suck by the way. Liberal Hannity is stomping a mud hole into you.houndawg wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 6:52 pmIts so glaringly obvious that a not guilty verdict before the election would benefit him that even you can see it. So you pour some weak piss about effective assistance as if he hasn't had a whole team of lawyers working on it for years already. Your parents must still have nightmares about that condom failing....SeaGulljizzSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 6:41 pm
Another MSNBC talking point and total lack of original thought. You're Maddow, UNI is Leftist Hannity and Klam is Reid. The trifecta of worthless gasbagging.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22560
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
You’re projecting again.SeattleGriz wrote:It's all you do. Nice try at now deflection. You acting like you care about Justice is golden! Gotta protect your Tribe at all costs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22560
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
WTF are you even talking about? It sure as shit wasn’t anything in my post.SeattleGriz wrote:Exposed again. Bro, it came about in 2002 because the Enron case. Evidentiary material was destroyed, and hence, obstructing an official proceeding.UNI88 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 3:57 pm Making up stories about a stolen election isn’t ensuring election integrity. Inciting a seditious riot isn’t ensuring election integrity. Putting together slates of fraudulent electors isn’t ensuring election integrity. Calling elected officials and attempting to bully them into not certifying results without proof of fraud isn’t ensuring election integrity.
His actions were the actions of a candidate (a disgruntled, sore loser of a candidate) and should not be considered Presidential duties.
trump himself was the greatest threat to election integrity in 2020 and he is likely to be again in 2024. MAGAt yahoo logic says it’s within the scope of biden’s duties as President to prevent that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk on
You keep getting your talking points from "Mueller She Wrote" as well apparently. Twitter Lawyer to the rescue. Not an original thought in your response.
Lazy ass.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
-
- Level5
- Posts: 24391
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
You lie!BDKJMU wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 1:43 pmHow many times have we seen lefties interrupt Congressional hearings ? Every time that happens that is anSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 12:35 pm
What was "obstruction of an official proceeding" used for originally? This is being used against J6 defendants as well.
Late edit: 18 U.S. § 1512(c)(2)
‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but they are almost never charged.
Jamaal Bowman pulling a House office building fire alarm in order to stop a Congressional vote was an ‘obstruction of an official proceeding’ but he wasn’t charged.
Just goes to show you the J6 political prisoners amd Trump being charged with it by a rabid democrat DC prosecutor and Smith is utter political BS.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
-
- Level5
- Posts: 24391
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Team Trump v/s Everyone
Hannity is a pussy. Like you. I can whup his ass before breakfast.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 7:00 pmYes Rachel. You've figured out that it not only takes time to actually get the documents from John Smith, but to analyze them as well. Your ratings suck by the way. Liberal Hannity is stomping a mud hole into you.houndawg wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 6:52 pm
Its so glaringly obvious that a not guilty verdict before the election would benefit him that even you can see it. So you pour some weak piss about effective assistance as if he hasn't had a whole team of lawyers working on it for years already. Your parents must still have nightmares about that condom failing....SeaGulljizz
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine