BUT
Klamdami is the single best nickname ever in the history of CS! CH really was made in my image

You spend almost as much time telling us how you pulled yourself up by your bootstraps as kalm does telling us how much empathy he has.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 2:31 pmLiving in poverty should be a motivatorkalm wrote: ↑Tue Dec 02, 2025 11:30 am
Interesting. Do you consider living in poverty soft?
I will always talk about empathy and kindness. They are virtues. I’m not worried in the least about someone using my own empathy against me. What a weird fear. And yes, I’ve been around the block enough times to recognize bad people. Many of the worst are “successful” professional types like lawyers, city officials, finance people, realtors, developers. Do you give bad people a pass because they’re “successful” and not on public assistance?
You live and have lived in a totally different environment than I have….
I was very naïve about the ways of the world when I left rural Sussex County but living in Miami, Puerto Rico and NYC have shown me there are a lot of advantage takers in this world and it’s not up to me to support every freaking one of them, especially the ones that are perfectly able to take care of themselves, but choose not to because the government encourage them not to…. For votes
Don’t confuse “successful” with being an elitist white collar snob How many times do I have to criticize these people before you stop making dumb comments and asking dumb questions

You support them politically and buy into their economics. And my point is that “takers” in the elitist white collar class also exist. And they take more in dollars by a metric shit ton than the poor.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 2:31 pmLiving in poverty should be a motivatorkalm wrote: ↑Tue Dec 02, 2025 11:30 am
Interesting. Do you consider living in poverty soft?
I will always talk about empathy and kindness. They are virtues. I’m not worried in the least about someone using my own empathy against me. What a weird fear. And yes, I’ve been around the block enough times to recognize bad people. Many of the worst are “successful” professional types like lawyers, city officials, finance people, realtors, developers. Do you give bad people a pass because they’re “successful” and not on public assistance?
You live and have lived in a totally different environment than I have….
I was very naïve about the ways of the world when I left rural Sussex County but living in Miami, Puerto Rico and NYC have shown me there are a lot of advantage takers in this world and it’s not up to me to support every freaking one of them, especially the ones that are perfectly able to take care of themselves, but choose not to because the government encourage them not to…. For votes
Don’t confuse “successful” with being an elitist white collar snob How many times do I have to criticize these people before you stop making dumb comments and asking dumb questions

The working class are screwed by “The government lifestyle” seekers that you supportkalm wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 4:17 pmYou support them politically and buy into their economics. And my point is that “takers” in the elitist white collar class also exist. And they take more in dollars by a metric shit ton than the poor.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 2:31 pm
Living in poverty should be a motivator
You live and have lived in a totally different environment than I have….
I was very naïve about the ways of the world when I left rural Sussex County but living in Miami, Puerto Rico and NYC have shown me there are a lot of advantage takers in this world and it’s not up to me to support every freaking one of them, especially the ones that are perfectly able to take care of themselves, but choose not to because the government encourage them not to…. For votes
Don’t confuse “successful” with being an elitist white collar snob How many times do I have to criticize these people before you stop making dumb comments and asking dumb questions
I do appreciate that you’ve experienced these different cultures.
Perhaps our common ground starts with raising the standard of living for the working class first?

Incorrect.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 6:12 amThe working class are screwed by “The government lifestyle” seekers that you supportkalm wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 4:17 pm
You support them politically and buy into their economics. And my point is that “takers” in the elitist white collar class also exist. And they take more in dollars by a metric shit ton than the poor.
I do appreciate that you’ve experienced these different cultures.
Perhaps our common ground starts with raising the standard of living for the working class first?


Yes. I’m ignoring it as you’ve already made clear that you think that’s the main problem. It isn’t and ignores the bigger parts of this situation. It also is a tired old attack point. Reagan’s welfare queens come to mind.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 7:21 am When I say “the lifestyle” do you know what I’m saying

kalm wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 8:08 amYes. I’m ignoring it as you’ve already made clear that you think that’s the main problem. It isn’t and ignores the bigger parts of this situation. It also is a tired old attack point. Reagan’s welfare queens come to mind.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 7:21 am When I say “the lifestyle” do you know what I’m saying
But that’s ok. We can disagree here and I’m fine with that.

I can see you’re having trouble with comprehension. Reagan and R’s since have blamed it on the welfare queen types. While some of that is deserved and can even become a generational problem it’s not the reason for our economic woes.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 1:44 pmkalm wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 8:08 am
Yes. I’m ignoring it as you’ve already made clear that you think that’s the main problem. It isn’t and ignores the bigger parts of this situation. It also is a tired old attack point. Reagan’s welfare queens come to mind.
But that’s ok. We can disagree here and I’m fine with that.![]()
Did you really just use Ronald Reagan and “the lifestyle” in the same sentence
Ronald Reagan detested that mentality while clueless morons like Joey rotten Biden support it

You’re probably the only person walking the Planet that associates Ronald Reagan with welfare Queens…kalm wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 8:08 amYes. I’m ignoring it as you’ve already made clear that you think that’s the main problem. It isn’t and ignores the bigger parts of this situation. It also is a tired old attack point. Reagan’s welfare queens come to mind.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 7:21 am When I say “the lifestyle” do you know what I’m saying
But that’s ok. We can disagree here and I’m fine with that.

Forgive me for not seeing this sooner God, but I must confess I don’t think I was the first person on here to use that accurate nickname for Klamdami

No…it was pretty clear what you meant by lifestyle. I’m sorry you’re confused by my reply.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri Dec 05, 2025 3:20 amYou’re probably the only person walking the Planet that associates Ronald Reagan with welfare Queens…kalm wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 8:08 am
Yes. I’m ignoring it as you’ve already made clear that you think that’s the main problem. It isn’t and ignores the bigger parts of this situation. It also is a tired old attack point. Reagan’s welfare queens come to mind.
But that’s ok. We can disagree here and I’m fine with that.
Once again, your instincts are very poor If you think I believe “the lifestyle” itself is the main problem.
“The "welfare queen" concept, popularized by Ronald Reagan in the 1970s and 80s, describes a stereotype of a woman (often Black) fraudulently exploiting welfare for luxury, based loosely on Chicago con artist Linda Taylor, but exaggerated to imply widespread abuse. Reagan used this narrative in his campaigns to argue for cutting social programs, shifting focus from systemic poverty to individual moral failings and influencing public perception of welfare recipients as undeserving, though actual fraud was a small minority.”
And you passed, your honesty knows no bounds, Go forth my sonCaribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri Dec 05, 2025 3:23 amForgive me for not seeing this sooner God, but I must confess I don’t think I was the first person on here to use that accurate nickname for Klamdami
But you knew that and we’re just testing me

It is the reason that too many blacks are still falling behind economically and educationally and living in the inner cities because it created a dependency and “the lifestyle” and it basically started to proliferate in the early Sixtieskalm wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:29 pmI can see you’re having trouble with comprehension. Reagan and R’s since have blamed it on the welfare queen types. While some of that is deserved and can even become a generational problem it’s not the reason for our economic woes.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 1:44 pm
![]()
Did you really just use Ronald Reagan and “the lifestyle” in the same sentence
Ronald Reagan detested that mentality while clueless morons like Joey rotten Biden support it

Thomas Sowell sums it up perfectly …. Your perceived kindness destroyed a whole generationkalm wrote: ↑Fri Dec 05, 2025 7:54 amNo…it was pretty clear what you meant by lifestyle. I’m sorry you’re confused by my reply.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri Dec 05, 2025 3:20 am
You’re probably the only person walking the Planet that associates Ronald Reagan with welfare Queens…
Once again, your instincts are very poor If you think I believe “the lifestyle” itself is the main problem.
You might be the only person above the age of 30, commenting on politics that doesn’t associate Reagan with welfare queens. Even Google’s AI knows of it.There’s still time for you to find a library and improve your knowledge of history.
From Google. (You can find similar on wiki or a whole host of books and articles on Reagan.):
“The "welfare queen" concept, popularized by Ronald Reagan in the 1970s and 80s, describes a stereotype of a woman (often Black) fraudulently exploiting welfare for luxury, based loosely on Chicago con artist Linda Taylor, but exaggerated to imply widespread abuse. Reagan used this narrative in his campaigns to argue for cutting social programs, shifting focus from systemic poverty to individual moral failings and influencing public perception of welfare recipients as undeserving, though actual fraud was a small minority.”

Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri Dec 05, 2025 1:16 pmThomas Sowell sums it up perfectly …. Your perceived kindness destroyed a whole generationkalm wrote: ↑Fri Dec 05, 2025 7:54 am
No…it was pretty clear what you meant by lifestyle. I’m sorry you’re confused by my reply.
You might be the only person above the age of 30, commenting on politics that doesn’t associate Reagan with welfare queens. Even Google’s AI knows of it.There’s still time for you to find a library and improve your knowledge of history.
From Google. (You can find similar on wiki or a whole host of books and articles on Reagan.):
Key Points of Sowell's View:
Family Destruction: Sowell contended that generous welfare benefits incentivized single motherhood and weakened family bonds, leading to higher rates of fatherlessness and instability, which he saw as a root cause of many social ills.
Dependency, Not Empowerment: He believed the welfare system created dependency, making people reliant on government handouts rather than self-sufficiency, which ultimately harmed recipients and communities.
Critique of "Liberalism": Sowell blamed liberal policies, not inherent flaws in Black culture, for the social problems he observed, arguing that these policies had corrosive effects.
Focus on Long-Term Results: Rather than focusing on individual "queens," Sowell emphasized the detrimental systemic outcomes of welfare on entire populations, promoting a "legacy of liberalism" that hurt Black progress.

You, just like your little socialist dingbat AOC, have no idea what it means to pull yourself up by your boat strapsUNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 2:39 pmYou spend almost as much time telling us how you pulled yourself up by your bootstraps as kalm does telling us how much empathy he has.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 2:31 pm
Living in poverty should be a motivator
You live and have lived in a totally different environment than I have….
I was very naïve about the ways of the world when I left rural Sussex County but living in Miami, Puerto Rico and NYC have shown me there are a lot of advantage takers in this world and it’s not up to me to support every freaking one of them, especially the ones that are perfectly able to take care of themselves, but choose not to because the government encourage them not to…. For votes
Don’t confuse “successful” with being an elitist white collar snob How many times do I have to criticize these people before you stop making dumb comments and asking dumb questions
You're not wrong about the society being soft but kalm isn't wrong either. Sometimes shit happens (like a major health crisis) to people who work hard and make good choices and they're left destitute as a result. A strong social safety net isn't a bad thing. I don't think we need what Canada or Europe has but I know that what we currently have isn't working either (and Obamacare is better than what we previously had). If we had real leaders, they would be able to work together, compromise and brainstorm to find a solution that works for the United States of America.
You want Democrats to work with trump? I agree they should but only if trump can compromise and meet Democrats somewhere in the middle to find a solution. Capitulating to trump's demands isn't "working with" him.

Blah, blah, blah ... you lecture kalm his holier than thou attitude and then get your panties all in a wad when I point out your holier than thou attitude.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Sat Dec 06, 2025 5:22 amYou, just like your little socialist dingbat AOC, have no idea what it means to pull yourself up by your boat strapsUNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 2:39 pm
You spend almost as much time telling us how you pulled yourself up by your bootstraps as kalm does telling us how much empathy he has.
You're not wrong about the society being soft but kalm isn't wrong either. Sometimes shit happens (like a major health crisis) to people who work hard and make good choices and they're left destitute as a result. A strong social safety net isn't a bad thing. I don't think we need what Canada or Europe has but I know that what we currently have isn't working either (and Obamacare is better than what we previously had). If we had real leaders, they would be able to work together, compromise and brainstorm to find a solution that works for the United States of America.
You want Democrats to work with trump? I agree they should but only if trump can compromise and meet Democrats somewhere in the middle to find a solution. Capitulating to trump's demands isn't "working with" him.
Just because I said I left home at an early age and told myself I need to figure this out, doesn’t mean I had to pull myself up by the boot straps
I had not fallen into the abyss nor was I feeling sorry for myself
JFC how dumb are you?

Nope, both you and AoC have severe TDSUNI88 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 06, 2025 12:20 pmBlah, blah, blah ... you lecture kalm his holier than thou attitude and then get your panties all in a wad when I point out your holier than thou attitude.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Sat Dec 06, 2025 5:22 am
You, just like your little socialist dingbat AOC, have no idea what it means to pull yourself up by your boat straps
Just because I said I left home at an early age and told myself I need to figure this out, doesn’t mean I had to pull myself up by the boot straps
I had not fallen into the abyss nor was I feeling sorry for myself
JFC how dumb are you?
Are you suffering from a head injury? Do you have dementia? I'm further from AOChe then you and MAQA yahoos are.

You and trump are closer to being socialists like AOChe than I am.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Sun Dec 07, 2025 4:54 amNope, both you and AoC have severe TDSUNI88 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 06, 2025 12:20 pm
Blah, blah, blah ... you lecture kalm his holier than thou attitude and then get your panties all in a wad when I point out your holier than thou attitude.
Are you suffering from a head injury? Do you have dementia? I'm further from AOChe then you and MAQA yahoos are.
Peas in a pod


Hear those farmers saying: "Pass the socialism please!"Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Nov 10, 2025 7:21 am The great Ronald Reagan once said “when socialism comes to America it’s gonna come with a smile”
Boy he wasn't lying
This Mandami character, a smiling devil, is the one Ronald warned us about…
Recently on Fox News interview, when reminded many of the wealthiest New Yorkers already pay 50% of their income in taxes and asked if was fair to raise their taxes another 2%….
He said if you’re making $1 million in New York City, you can certainly afford to pay more taxes because it will raise your quality of life…….
![]()

Per capita GDP the US isn’t close to the richest in the world.