Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Political discussions
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 28775
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by UNI88 »

GannonFan wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 8:45 am
UNI88 wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 10:30 pm
I say C) Both.

Didn't Fred have Alzheimer's? Maybe he inherited it.
My wife swears it's dementia, I just think he's always been this dumb and crazy.

And yes, it is refreshing to hear our far-left leaning folks to finally get concerned about dementia in our leaders after doing everything they could to push back and/or ignore it through 4 years of Biden at the helm. Hopefully this means we elect a new President in 2028 who might even be under the age of 70 when elected. That would be refreshing too.
I think the "dumb and crazy" is getting worse. He seems to be losing his ability to filter his thoughts before he speaks.

Plus there are the other/physical signs:
- Dozing off in meetings
- Difficulty walking in a straight line
- Difficulty with stairs / grabbing the rail with a different hand than usual (sign of a minor stroke?)
- Patches on his skin, cankles, etc.

There are a lot of signs of a variety of potential health issues.

I get why the Democrats trotted biden out in 2020 but he wasn't fit even then and he should have stepped aside a year or two into his presidency. Not that I think harris would have been much better but at least she had all her faculties.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 28775
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by UNI88 »

Speaking of trump's health - If he wants to take the world back to a time when might makes right and the strongest nations took what they wanted then we should go all the way and ownership of Greenland should be decided by trial by combat: trump vs. King Frederik X.

It could be epic like David vs. Goliath or Achilles vs. Hector.

Divine justice would decide the outcome, if God is on trump's side, he will win. If not, he will lose.

No excuses about trump's age or health. He's always telling us that his health is perfect and that doctors say he's the healthiest POTUS. Time to put up or shut up.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18752
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by SeattleGriz »

Art of the Deal.

Trump got what he needed out of Denmark (Greenland) and NATO.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 67752
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by kalm »

SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:16 am Art of the Deal.

Trump got what he needed out of Denmark (Greenland) and NATO.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 28775
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by UNI88 »

kalm wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:25 am
SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:16 am Art of the Deal.

Trump got what he needed out of Denmark (Greenland) and NATO.
:nod:

NATO chief Rutte 'may have explained to Trump existing US rights in Greenland'
'There really are no substantive concessions that Mark Rutte could have given Trump', FRANCE 24's Brussels correspondent Dave Keating explains, adding that the NATO chief may 'have just explained to Trump the existing rights that the US has in Greenland and sold this to Trump as something new'.
Rutte could informally discuss an agreement but it would not be not binding on NATO. The member states would have to approve of any agreement by consensus.

Image
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19120
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by GannonFan »

kalm wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 10:32 am
GannonFan wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 8:45 am

My wife swears it's dementia, I just think he's always been this dumb and crazy.

And yes, it is refreshing to hear our far-left leaning folks to finally get concerned about dementia in our leaders after doing everything they could to push back and/or ignore it through 4 years of Biden at the helm. Hopefully this means we elect a new President in 2028 who might even be under the age of 70 when elected. That would be refreshing too.
Agreed except the far left folks never liked Biden much and many of them were calling for a real primary after he bowed out. Kamala was not their preferred choice either. The establishment left and media were the ones supporting Biden for far too long.
Then the far left folks must be really small in number because there was little to no dissension when Biden finally bowed out (as UNI says, probably at least 2 years too late as it was clear even when he was elected that he was diminishing) and when Kamala was anointed (anointed may sound too pejorative, but it's not far from the truth of what did happen). Once the election strategy was to pave the way and help Trump be the Republican nominee (and I still say the purposeful stalling of legal proceedings to coincide with the election was Democratic strategy) the Dems had locked in Biden as their only option - certainly something Biden's camp was way too eager to accede to as it kept their proximity to power in place. The crickets in the Democratic party as this strategy played out was significant and noticeable. The idea that the far left was raising a stink and strongly pushing back against Biden, either during his Presidency or even after the debate when it was clear he couldn't go on, is revisionist history at its best. They too were far too content to just have a "D" in the White House and claim the win, actual policy be damned. :coffee:
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18752
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by SeattleGriz »

kalm wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:25 am
SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:16 am Art of the Deal.

Trump got what he needed out of Denmark (Greenland) and NATO.
Filipkowski doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground.

This was all out there for anyone who isn't a willful idiot to figure out.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19120
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by GannonFan »

kalm wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:25 am
SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:16 am Art of the Deal.

Trump got what he needed out of Denmark (Greenland) and NATO.
Yup. Quite possibly Trump had no comprehension of what deals were already in place in Greenland before this and the absolute "do whatever we want" military posture we could take there. He is quite stupid. :coffee:
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18752
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by SeattleGriz »

GannonFan wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:23 pm
kalm wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:25 am

Yup. Quite possibly Trump had no comprehension of what deals were already in place in Greenland before this and the absolute "do whatever we want" military posture we could take there. He is quite stupid. :coffee:
:rofl: Yes, it sure sounds like he accomplished nothing.
*It’s bigger than Greenland; the deal includes NATO, “Golden Dome” missile shield development rights, and extends to the entire Arctic, not just the island.
*The US will not “own” the island, but will get “pockets of sovereignty” to build military bases, possibly mine rare earths, and watch the ice grow.
*The US will somehow participate in or control rare earth development.
*China and Russia are barred from Greenland.
*The US pays zero. Nothing to Denmark. Nothing to the Greenlanders. (At least, no payment terms were mentioned by anyone.)
*Trump said the deal will have an “indefinite” timeframe; i.e., permanent.
For example, easily located defense contracts, published right on official US government websites, reveal the United States approved at least six major arms deals with Denmark over a six-week period starting in mid November, 2025. They include $318 million for AIM-9X missiles (Nov. 14), $730 million for AIM-120C-8 missiles (Dec. 11), $951 million for AMRAAM-ER missiles (Dec. 23), $1.8 billion for P-8A aircraft (Dec. 29), $45 million for Hellfire missiles (Jan. 8, 2026), and Denmark was allowed to redeem its expired savings stamps in return for several deluxe family appliances.

For comparison, the six weeks saw about ten times the volume of defense sales to Denmark during the entire previous twelve-month period, when the Nordic nation purchased only a handful of 9mm bullets and a large customized fighting stick that can be affixed to a dogsled.

In other words, while Trump was threatening to invade Greenland “the hard way,” the Danes were paying him billions of dollars. You think those remarkable, multi-billion dollar sales numbers might have been significant to the public’s understanding of the developing “Greenland crisis?”

None of it was a secret. Again, all the deals were published right on the Defense Security Cooperation Agency’s website. The stories even appeared in the military press
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 35195
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by BDKJMU »

kalm wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 10:25 pm MAGA dudes. So which is it? Dementia or extremely low IQ?

After 4 years from Spring 2020 to the Summer of 2024 debate the left claiming Dementia Joe was mentally sharp, and ‘sharp as a tack’ and didn’t have dementia, you want to claim Trump has dementia.. :suspicious: :dunce: :lol: :rofl:
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 35195
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by BDKJMU »

GannonFan wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 8:45 am
UNI88 wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 10:30 pm

I say C) Both.

Didn't Fred have Alzheimer's? Maybe he inherited it.
My wife swears it's dementia, I just think he's always been this dumb and crazy.

And yes, it is refreshing to hear our far-left leaning folks to finally get concerned about dementia in our leaders after doing everything they could to push back and/or ignore it through 4 years of Biden at the helm. Hopefully this means we elect a new President in 2028 who might even be under the age of 70 when elected. That would be refreshing too.
Lawl if that isn’t an understatement.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18752
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by SeattleGriz »

BDKJMU wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:34 pm
kalm wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 10:25 pm MAGA dudes. So which is it? Dementia or extremely low IQ?

After 4 years from Spring 2020 to the Summer of 2024 debate the left claiming Dementia Joe was mentally sharp, and ‘sharp as a tack’ and didn’t have dementia, you want to claim Trump has dementia.. :suspicious: :dunce: :lol: :rofl:
This is also why Liberals cannot meme. They have no originality. PedoJoe was essentially an invalid, but they will try to turn it around at Trump to "own MAGA", no matter how unoriginal and unfounded their claims are. Nobody takes the screeching seriously.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 28775
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by UNI88 »

SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:33 pm
GannonFan wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:23 pm
Yup. Quite possibly Trump had no comprehension of what deals were already in place in Greenland before this and the absolute "do whatever we want" military posture we could take there. He is quite stupid. :coffee:
:rofl: Yes, it sure sounds like he accomplished nothing.
*It’s bigger than Greenland; the deal includes NATO, “Golden Dome” missile shield development rights, and extends to the entire Arctic, not just the island.
*The US will not “own” the island, but will get “pockets of sovereignty” to build military bases, possibly mine rare earths, and watch the ice grow.
*The US will somehow participate in or control rare earth development.

*China and Russia are barred from Greenland.
*The US pays zero. Nothing to Denmark. Nothing to the Greenlanders. (At least, no payment terms were mentioned by anyone.)
*Trump said the deal will have an “indefinite” timeframe; i.e., permanent.
For example, easily located defense contracts, published right on official US government websites, reveal the United States approved at least six major arms deals with Denmark over a six-week period starting in mid November, 2025. They include $318 million for AIM-9X missiles (Nov. 14), $730 million for AIM-120C-8 missiles (Dec. 11), $951 million for AMRAAM-ER missiles (Dec. 23), $1.8 billion for P-8A aircraft (Dec. 29), $45 million for Hellfire missiles (Jan. 8, 2026), and Denmark was allowed to redeem its expired savings stamps in return for several deluxe family appliances.

For comparison, the six weeks saw about ten times the volume of defense sales to Denmark during the entire previous twelve-month period, when the Nordic nation purchased only a handful of 9mm bullets and a large customized fighting stick that can be affixed to a dogsled.

In other words, while Trump was threatening to invade Greenland “the hard way,” the Danes were paying him billions of dollars. You think those remarkable, multi-billion dollar sales numbers might have been significant to the public’s understanding of the developing “Greenland crisis?”

None of it was a secret. Again, all the deals were published right on the Defense Security Cooperation Agency’s website. The stories even appeared in the military press
What of the bolded part did the US not already have? And as far as a “Golden Dome” missile shield development rights for Greenland, we probably already had that as well. As far as extending them to the entire Arctic, I don't think that's within Rutte's authority to agree to.
UNI88 wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:36 am NATO chief Rutte 'may have explained to Trump existing US rights in Greenland'
'There really are no substantive concessions that Mark Rutte could have given Trump', FRANCE 24's Brussels correspondent Dave Keating explains, adding that the NATO chief may 'have just explained to Trump the existing rights that the US has in Greenland and sold this to Trump as something new'.
Rutte could informally discuss an agreement but it would not be not binding on NATO. The member states would have to approve of any agreement by consensus.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18752
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by SeattleGriz »

UNI88 wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 1:46 pm
SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:33 pm

:rofl: Yes, it sure sounds like he accomplished nothing.



What of the bolded part did the US not already have? And as far as a “Golden Dome” missile shield development rights for Greenland, we probably already had that as well. As far as extending them to the entire Arctic, I don't think that's within Rutte's authority to agree to.
UNI88 wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:36 am NATO chief Rutte 'may have explained to Trump existing US rights in Greenland'



Rutte could informally discuss an agreement but it would not be not binding on NATO. The member states would have to approve of any agreement by consensus.
You tell me, I already know, because I inform myself.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 28775
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by UNI88 »

SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 1:49 pm
UNI88 wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 1:46 pm

What of the bolded part did the US not already have? And as far as a “Golden Dome” missile shield development rights for Greenland, we probably already had that as well. As far as extending them to the entire Arctic, I don't think that's within Rutte's authority to agree to.
You tell me, I already know, because I inform myself.
I asked you, this is your opportunity to wow me with your stable brilliance. Stop being lazy and show me what you have.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 67752
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by kalm »

GannonFan wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:22 pm
kalm wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 10:32 am

Agreed except the far left folks never liked Biden much and many of them were calling for a real primary after he bowed out. Kamala was not their preferred choice either. The establishment left and media were the ones supporting Biden for far too long.
Then the far left folks must be really small in number because there was little to no dissension when Biden finally bowed out (as UNI says, probably at least 2 years too late as it was clear even when he was elected that he was diminishing) and when Kamala was anointed (anointed may sound too pejorative, but it's not far from the truth of what did happen). Once the election strategy was to pave the way and help Trump be the Republican nominee (and I still say the purposeful stalling of legal proceedings to coincide with the election was Democratic strategy) the Dems had locked in Biden as their only option - certainly something Biden's camp was way too eager to accede to as it kept their proximity to power in place. The crickets in the Democratic party as this strategy played out was significant and noticeable. The idea that the far left was raising a stink and strongly pushing back against Biden, either during his Presidency or even after the debate when it was clear he couldn't go on, is revisionist history at its best. They too were far too content to just have a "D" in the White House and claim the win, actual policy be damned. :coffee:
Thinly veiled insults are not needed here. The progressive wing of the Dem party has been assimilated. Most leftists do not consider themselves Democrats so they’re not going to have much voice within the party or from establishment media. :coffee:
Image
Image
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 67752
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by kalm »

BDKJMU wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:34 pm
kalm wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 10:25 pm MAGA dudes. So which is it? Dementia or extremely low IQ?

After 4 years from Spring 2020 to the Summer of 2024 debate the left claiming Dementia Joe was mentally sharp, and ‘sharp as a tack’ and didn’t have dementia, you want to claim Trump has dementia.. :suspicious: :dunce: :lol: :rofl:
Way to dodge the question.
Image
Image
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 67752
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by kalm »

SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:22 pm
kalm wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:25 am

Filipkowski doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground.

This was all out there for anyone who isn't a willful idiot to figure out.
Just follow the circle. You’re welcome.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 28775
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by UNI88 »

kalm wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 3:06 pm
SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:22 pm
Filipkowski doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground.

This was all out there for anyone who isn't a willful idiot to figure out.
Just follow the circle. You’re welcome.
I think they got the order wrong. It should be:
I make a stupid decision > Something really bad happens > I reverse my decision > I convince my follower the problem is now magically solved.
Last edited by UNI88 on Thu Jan 22, 2026 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 28775
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by UNI88 »

BDKJMU wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:34 pm
kalm wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 10:25 pm MAGA dudes. So which is it? Dementia or extremely low IQ?

After 4 years from Spring 2020 to the Summer of 2024 debate the left claiming Dementia Joe was mentally sharp, and ‘sharp as a tack’ and didn’t have dementia, you want to claim Trump has dementia.. :suspicious: :dunce: :lol: :rofl:
Both can be true:
- biden was not "mentally sharp/sharp as a tack", and he definitely showed signs of aging, possibly dementia
- trump is losing his marbles and is definitely showed signs of aging, possibly dementia
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
Caribbean Hen
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7130
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:24 pm
I am a fan of: DELAWARE
Location: Bermuda Triangle

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by Caribbean Hen »

SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:53 pm
BDKJMU wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:34 pm
After 4 years from Spring 2020 to the Summer of 2024 debate the left claiming Dementia Joe was mentally sharp, and ‘sharp as a tack’ and didn’t have dementia, you want to claim Trump has dementia.. :suspicious: :dunce: :lol: :rofl:
This is also why Liberals cannot meme. They have no originality. PedoJoe was essentially an invalid, but they will try to turn it around at Trump to "own MAGA", no matter how unoriginal and unfounded their claims are. Nobody takes the screeching seriously.
All of these raging TDSers are just jealous that Trump is getting so much done and had the vision to put Greenland on the table. Eventually, Greenland will be owned by the USA.

It’s just a matter of time

They hate it because it means that USA will be stronger
Caribbean Hen
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7130
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:24 pm
I am a fan of: DELAWARE
Location: Bermuda Triangle

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by Caribbean Hen »

kalm wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 9:53 pm
Caribbean Hen wrote: Wed Jan 21, 2026 9:31 pm

Chico and the man!

You’re to young rerun
Do you know who Norman Leer was?
Do you know who rerun was?
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18752
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by SeattleGriz »

UNI88 wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 2:44 pm
SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 1:49 pm

You tell me, I already know, because I inform myself.
I asked you, this is your opportunity to wow me with your stable brilliance. Stop being lazy and show me what you have.
Let me get this straight. You froth at the mouth for a week over Trump being an idiot, retard and war monger and only now after a deal, you say the framework was already there?

The onus is on you to try and salvage your credibility.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18752
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by SeattleGriz »

kalm wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 3:06 pm
SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 12:22 pm

Filipkowski doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground.

This was all out there for anyone who isn't a willful idiot to figure out.
Just follow the circle. You’re welcome.
Trump got what he wanted.

How's that circle look now? Like you AGAIN didn't bother to even do basic research. :ohno:

You have a real knack for following idiots. Filipkowski, Krystal and pedophile enabling Lincoln project. Hilarious how you align with supposed conservatives simply because they switched their grift to liberals when they saw Trump ended their careers on the Republican side with his election.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 28775
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: trump 0.2: MAQAA

Post by UNI88 »

SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 4:03 pm
UNI88 wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 2:44 pm
I asked you, this is your opportunity to wow me with your stable brilliance. Stop being lazy and show me what you have.
Let me get this straight. You froth at the mouth for a week over Trump being an idiot, retard and war monger and only now after a deal, you say the framework was already there?

The onus is on you to try and salvage your credibility.
trump thinks he got a deal when most of what he got was already in place and what wasn't has to be negotiated and agreed upon by either Denmark & Greenland and/or NATO member states. Rutte has very limited authority to negotiate / make concessions.

And yes, it takes a special kind of idiot to believe that they negotiated the framework of a deal when most of that deal was already in place. Maybe trump knew this and he's counting on his MAQA yahoo followers to be special kinds of idiots and fall for it when he tells them he negotiated the framework of a deal. Regardless, there are some special kinds of idiots trumpeting this "great accomplishment". :rofl:

You like to tell kalm and me that we're disgusting - you using the R word is disgusting. You should know better.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
Post Reply