Climate Change Defamation

[GannonFan]

Technically speaking, the Clinton campaign also had connections to Russia and Russia did interfere in the 2016 election (as they have in pretty much every election since 1917). I get it that Russia wanted Trump to win in 2016, but let's also be honest about the interactions that both campaigns had with Russian sources.

I don't disagree but the whole russia collusion HOAX argument is baloney.

• There were connections between the trump campaign and russia.
• russia did interfere in the 2016 election by hacking the Democrat's servers, releasing information, and spreading misinformation on social media.
• and while there is no charge for collusion, the charges of obstruction, lying, and cover-ups were real
• they just didn't have enough to prove prove criminal agreement/intent beyond a reasonable doubt
• the media and Democrats made a mountain out of a mole hill

So, saying it was absolutely nothing is a lie, misinformation, wrong, whatever you want to call it and I'm going to continue pointing it out when MAQA yahoos type Russia Collusion Hoax. That is part of their strategy - to rewrite the history of things like the Mueller investigation, January 6, etc. to make themselves both the victims and the heroes.

It's all good, but when the Clinton campaign solicited information on Trump from Russian sources and then fed that information, true or untrue, back through our own intelligence channels, it's strange to only focus on the Trump side of the collusion narrative. James Comey was far from a neutral player in all of this as well. Just a cluster all the way around back in 2016.

[UNI88]

I don't disagree but the whole russia collusion HOAX argument is baloney.

• There were connections between the trump campaign and russia.
• russia did interfere in the 2016 election by hacking the Democrat's servers, releasing information, and spreading misinformation on social media.
• and while there is no charge for collusion, the charges of obstruction, lying, and cover-ups were real
• they just didn't have enough to prove prove criminal agreement/intent beyond a reasonable doubt
• the media and Democrats made a mountain out of a mole hill

So, saying it was absolutely nothing is a lie, misinformation, wrong, whatever you want to call it and I'm going to continue pointing it out when MAQA yahoos type Russia Collusion Hoax. That is part of their strategy - to rewrite the history of things like the Mueller investigation, January 6, etc. to make themselves both the victims and the heroes.

It's all good, but when the Clinton campaign solicited information on Trump from Russian sources and then fed that information, true or untrue, back through our own intelligence channels, it's strange to only focus on the Trump side of the collusion narrative. James Comey was far from a neutral player in all of this as well. Just a cluster all the way around back in 2016.

Is it strange? The clintons are just as despicable as trump but neither one is currently president and they're no longer in the public eye (except for ties to Epstein). I also don't see clinton apologists on here trying to rewrite history and make them out to be both the victims and heroes. Why should I waste keystrokes pointing out their (or comey's) skeletons?

No argument from me on it being a cluster all the way around back in 2016. Unfortunately that cluster has continued to 2026.

[Caribbean Hen]

is

The CIA that was under Brennan? The same guy who signed onto the 51 "intelligence" officials declaring Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation? The same guy who is under federal investigation for the report you quoted?

As Cap'n Cat used to say. Go read up and educate yourself boy and then report back.

And the "CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe" that was released in July, 2025 (under the trump administration) found no major flaws.

I will ask the questions that you are ducking and dodging (like you do most serious questions that you don't like the answers to):
1) Did the trump campaign have any connections to russia?
2) Did russia interfere in the 2016 election?

What dirt did the Russians put out on Hillary?

Be specific

[UNI88]

is

And the "CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe" that was released in July, 2025 (under the trump administration) found no major flaws.

I will ask the questions that you are ducking and dodging (like you do most serious questions that you don't like the answers to):
1) Did the trump campaign have any connections to russia?
2) Did russia interfere in the 2016 election?

What dirt did the Russians put out on Hillary?

Be specific

Photos of her and trump caught in flagrante delicto.

Keep asking inane questions and I will continue to give you juvenile answers.

Or you could stop being lazy and use Google or another search tool to find answers yourself.

[Caribbean Hen]

It's all good, but when the Clinton campaign solicited information on Trump from Russian sources and then fed that information, true or untrue, back through our own intelligence channels, it's strange to only focus on the Trump side of the collusion narrative. James Comey was far from a neutral player in all of this as well. Just a cluster all the way around back in 2016.

Is it strange? The clintons are just as despicable as trump but neither one is currently president and they're no longer in the public eye (except for ties to Epstein). I also don't see clinton apologists on here trying to rewrite history and make them out to be both the victims and heroes. Why should I waste keystrokes pointing out their (or comey's) skeletons?

No argument from me on it being a cluster all the way around back in 2016. Unfortunately that cluster has continued to 2026.

So now you’re claiming Trump is not the president…

Maybe you should take a little road trip to clear your head

[UNI88]

Is it strange? The clintons are just as despicable as trump but neither one is currently president and they're no longer in the public eye (except for ties to Epstein). I also don't see clinton apologists on here trying to rewrite history and make them out to be both the victims and heroes. Why should I waste keystrokes pointing out their (or comey's) skeletons?

No argument from me on it being a cluster all the way around back in 2016. Unfortunately that cluster has continued to 2026.

So now you’re claiming Trump is not the president…

Maybe you should take a little road trip to clear your head

I thought about responding to this post with ridicule/mockery but decided to let the idiocy of it stand on it's own.

[Caribbean Hen]

So now you’re claiming Trump is not the president…

Maybe you should take a little road trip to clear your head

I thought about responding to this post with ridicule/mockery but decided to let the idiocy of it stand on it's own.

Hillary was the President's left hand. Kind of like Chang and Eng are one or two people