Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
Post Reply
JALMOND
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5467
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State
A.K.A.: JALMOND

Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by JALMOND »

Hard to believe, even for me, but we head into the third week of the season and I am a perfect 17-0 so far. Now is when things get tough as we head into conference play. Just four games involving conference teams, but three are inter-conference matchups. Montana State and Sacramento State are off this week, both getting ready for their conference openers next week. Here are the predictions for this week as I put my perfect record on the line.

ISU @ WSU---So I start out with what may be the easiest pick this week. The Wildcats have looked sharp against Mountain West teams, Wyoming and Colorado State, while the Bengals have not looked too great against Arizona State and Oklahoma. Both teams enter this game 0-2 which means someone will leave with their first win of the year. Thing is, the Bengals probably have played the toughest two teams, which really does not mean that much...WSU 51, ISU 10.

Southern Utah @ NAU---The only Bg Sky team playing this week that is not facing a fellow conference member. The Jacks looked impressive against Pac-10 Arizona and take on a pesky Southern Utah game that gave them all they could handle last year in Cedar City. Southern Utah thinks they could beat the Jacks this year and they probably could, if the game was not in Flagstaff...NAU 28, Southern Utah 17.

UNC @ EWU---Things have been pretty par for the course for the Eagles, take care of business against the DII and then take the money from Cal and go home. The Bears, on the other hand, got the win they needed and head to Cheney with some momentum. To win at EWU would be monumental for the Bears and set the tone for a great year. To come close would maybe not be big, but a step in the right direction. Take a step...EWU 24, UNC 17.

PSU @ UM---The Griz come in to this conference opener having won their first two games, and while they have not been dominant, nonetheless they are two wins. The Vikings have had moments where they look pretty good, but have wound up where they thought they would be at 1-1. Both teams rely on strong offensive performances, yet both offenses have appeared rather pathetic at times. This game could end up being an offensive shootout, or an ugly affair, depending on the play of both offenses. I prefer an offensive shootout...UM 38, PSU 34.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by AZGrizFan »

38-34? Are you high?

How about 24-10. :coffee: :coffee:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

If anything, flip the scores between the EWU/UNC and the UM/PSU games. I'll go with...

ISU 17 @ WSU 42

SUU 28 @ NAU 34

UNC 28 @ EWU 35

PSU 17 @ UM 24
User avatar
OB55
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:50 pm
I am a fan of: UNC
A.K.A.: Reputation Whore

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by OB55 »

ISU 6 @ WSU 27

SUU 27 @ NAU 28

UNC 24 @ EWU 17

PSU 10 @ UM 28
Image
JALMOND
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5467
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State
A.K.A.: JALMOND

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by JALMOND »

AZGrizFan wrote:38-34? Are you high?

How about 24-10. :coffee: :coffee:
If we can hold the Griz to just 24 points, I like our chances. Truth is, both teams are due for a breakout offensive game. I'll stay with the points.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by AZGrizFan »

JALMOND wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:38-34? Are you high?

How about 24-10. :coffee: :coffee:
If we can hold the Griz to just 24 points, I like our chances. Truth is, both teams are due for a breakout offensive game. I'll stay with the points.

Conversely, if we give UP 34 points, I don't see any WAY we win. :coffee: :coffee:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
JALMOND
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5467
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State
A.K.A.: JALMOND

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by JALMOND »

AZGrizFan wrote:
JALMOND wrote:
If we can hold the Griz to just 24 points, I like our chances. Truth is, both teams are due for a breakout offensive game. I'll stay with the points.

Conversely, if we give UP 34 points, I don't see any WAY we win. :coffee: :coffee:
Glanville is still in charge of the defense. Your boys should have 30 in the first half alone.

What does Glanville's defenses and swiss cheese have in common? Big holes everywhere. :mrgreen: :lol:
User avatar
Wildcat Ryan
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2798
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:59 pm
I am a fan of: WEBER STATE
A.K.A.: WILDCAT, WILDCATFAN

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by Wildcat Ryan »

I dont want to sound greedy, but I kinda hope Weber puts more than 51 points up on Idaho State
Image
User avatar
Mike Johnson
Level1
Level1
Posts: 365
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:37 pm
I am a fan of: Utah/UVU/WSU/SUU/DSC
A.K.A.: Mike Johnson

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by Mike Johnson »

Wildcat Ryan wrote:I dont want to sound greedy, but I kinda hope Weber puts more than 51 points up on Idaho State
Weber could if they could put a stop to the turnovers that cost them points and the game at Colorado State.
Image Image
Image
User avatar
Wildcat Ryan
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2798
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:59 pm
I am a fan of: WEBER STATE
A.K.A.: WILDCAT, WILDCATFAN

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by Wildcat Ryan »

Mike Johnson wrote:
Wildcat Ryan wrote:I dont want to sound greedy, but I kinda hope Weber puts more than 51 points up on Idaho State
Weber could if they could put a stop to the turnovers that cost them points and the game at Colorado State.

No kidding man, Im still fuming about that loss, I think Weber is angry right now, and they will take out thier anger on ISU, Weber needs to keep control and not turn it over and this game should be an easy win, but who knows.
Image
User avatar
RobsPics
Level1
Level1
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:39 pm
I am a fan of: PSU

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by RobsPics »

PSU 27
UM 17
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

Correct Pick
Incorrect Pick
Actual Score
(-123) = Difference between predicted and actual point spread
APSE = Average Point Spread Error
_________________________________________________

ISU 17 @ WSU 42
ISU 17 @ WSU 44 (-2) :thumb:

SUU 28 @ NAU 34
SUU 39 @ NAU 42 (-3) :popcorn:

UNC 28 @ EWU 35
UNC 0 @ EWU 16 (-9) :wall:

PSU 17 @ UM 24
PSU 17 @ UM 49 (-25) :doh:
_________________________________________________

This week: 4-0
Last week: 8-1
Overall: 20-1
APSE this week: 9.8 pts
APSE last week: 13.3 pts
APSE overall: 11.7 pts
Last edited by Screamin_Eagle174 on Sat Sep 19, 2009 10:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
JALMOND
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5467
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State
A.K.A.: JALMOND

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by JALMOND »

JALMOND wrote:Hard to believe, even for me, but we head into the third week of the season and I am a perfect 17-0 so far. Now is when things get tough as we head into conference play. Just four games involving conference teams, but three are inter-conference matchups. Montana State and Sacramento State are off this week, both getting ready for their conference openers next week. Here are the predictions for this week as I put my perfect record on the line.

ISU @ WSU---So I start out with what may be the easiest pick this week. The Wildcats have looked sharp against Mountain West teams, Wyoming and Colorado State, while the Bengals have not looked too great against Arizona State and Oklahoma. Both teams enter this game 0-2 which means someone will leave with their first win of the year. Thing is, the Bengals probably have played the toughest two teams, which really does not mean that much...WSU 51, ISU 10.

Southern Utah @ NAU---The only Bg Sky team playing this week that is not facing a fellow conference member. The Jacks looked impressive against Pac-10 Arizona and take on a pesky Southern Utah game that gave them all they could handle last year in Cedar City. Southern Utah thinks they could beat the Jacks this year and they probably could, if the game was not in Flagstaff...NAU 28, Southern Utah 17.

UNC @ EWU---Things have been pretty par for the course for the Eagles, take care of business against the DII and then take the money from Cal and go home. The Bears, on the other hand, got the win they needed and head to Cheney with some momentum. To win at EWU would be monumental for the Bears and set the tone for a great year. To come close would maybe not be big, but a step in the right direction. Take a step...EWU 24, UNC 17.

PSU @ UM---The Griz come in to this conference opener having won their first two games, and while they have not been dominant, nonetheless they are two wins. The Vikings have had moments where they look pretty good, but have wound up where they thought they would be at 1-1. Both teams rely on strong offensive performances, yet both offenses have appeared rather pathetic at times. This game could end up being an offensive shootout, or an ugly affair, depending on the play of both offenses. I prefer an offensive shootout...UM 38, PSU 34.
Scream may have been closer than I was on the points, but I am still perfect (21-0), only because he had no love for UNC last week. :D
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

JALMOND wrote:
JALMOND wrote:Hard to believe, even for me, but we head into the third week of the season and I am a perfect 17-0 so far. Now is when things get tough as we head into conference play. Just four games involving conference teams, but three are inter-conference matchups. Montana State and Sacramento State are off this week, both getting ready for their conference openers next week. Here are the predictions for this week as I put my perfect record on the line.

ISU @ WSU---So I start out with what may be the easiest pick this week. The Wildcats have looked sharp against Mountain West teams, Wyoming and Colorado State, while the Bengals have not looked too great against Arizona State and Oklahoma. Both teams enter this game 0-2 which means someone will leave with their first win of the year. Thing is, the Bengals probably have played the toughest two teams, which really does not mean that much...WSU 51, ISU 10.

Southern Utah @ NAU---The only Bg Sky team playing this week that is not facing a fellow conference member. The Jacks looked impressive against Pac-10 Arizona and take on a pesky Southern Utah game that gave them all they could handle last year in Cedar City. Southern Utah thinks they could beat the Jacks this year and they probably could, if the game was not in Flagstaff...NAU 28, Southern Utah 17.

UNC @ EWU---Things have been pretty par for the course for the Eagles, take care of business against the DII and then take the money from Cal and go home. The Bears, on the other hand, got the win they needed and head to Cheney with some momentum. To win at EWU would be monumental for the Bears and set the tone for a great year. To come close would maybe not be big, but a step in the right direction. Take a step...EWU 24, UNC 17.

PSU @ UM---The Griz come in to this conference opener having won their first two games, and while they have not been dominant, nonetheless they are two wins. The Vikings have had moments where they look pretty good, but have wound up where they thought they would be at 1-1. Both teams rely on strong offensive performances, yet both offenses have appeared rather pathetic at times. This game could end up being an offensive shootout, or an ugly affair, depending on the play of both offenses. I prefer an offensive shootout...UM 38, PSU 34.
Scream may have been closer than I was on the points, but I am still perfect (21-0), only because he had no love for UNC last week. :D
Naw, I overrated San Diego. I picked SD to squeak it out, instead they choked. Gave UNC too much credit this week... if your turnover ratio is +4, chances are slim to none that you win the game... Weber State proved that to some extent the last two weeks.
DoubleNicks
Level1
Level1
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:29 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: DoubleNicks

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by DoubleNicks »

Actually, you did a little better than you first calculated since
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote: SUU 28 @ NAU 34
SUU 39 @ NAU 42 (-4) :popcorn:
should be

SUU 28 @ NAU 34
SUU 39 @ NAU 42 (-3) :popcorn:
Image
Image
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

DoubleNicks wrote:Actually, you did a little better than you first calculated since
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote: SUU 28 @ NAU 34
SUU 39 @ NAU 42 (-4) :popcorn:
should be

SUU 28 @ NAU 34
SUU 39 @ NAU 42 (-3) :popcorn:
Yeah, someone over at AGS caught that... just edited it.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Big Sky Predictions 9-19

Post by AZGrizFan »

JALMOND wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:

Conversely, if we give UP 34 points, I don't see any WAY we win. :coffee: :coffee:
Glanville is still in charge of the defense. Your boys should have 30 in the first half alone.

What does Glanville's defenses and swiss cheese have in common? Big holes everywhere. :mrgreen: :lol:
Well, you were wrong. We only had 28. :lol: :lol:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
Post Reply