CID1990 wrote:I give more money to charity than would EVER get to the needy through the taxes I pay. I don't have a problem with finding ways to extend health care to all. I just know that the government will fvck it up to the point that only about 5 cents out of every dollar I pay to the system will be worth a sh!t.
Our government, and by government I mean our representatives and senators have been committing larceny for decades. They hedge and borrow against social programs such as Social Security and Medicare to pay for useless sh!t like runway extensions in PA and bovine happiness studies in Iowa. That's why SS and Medicare are fvcked up and almost insolvent, and that is why government run health insurance would be fvcked from the first day.
I don't know where everybody gets their faith in Washington from.
Well said, Cid!
Here is an interesting relevant tidbit about the real status of healthcare in the U.S., from the Mises Institute. (mises.org)
"...It's a near-universal assumption of the healthcare debate that the current system is a market system and it is broken, and hence we should try a government system. The people who assume this aren't considering the last 100 years of healthcare policy. Government is deeply involved at all levels, from medical licensure and patents, to direct subsidies and provision, to employee mandates and insurance-pooling controls, at all levels.
It's been a steady path to medical serfdom all the way, under both parties, and this is precisely what accounts for most of the problems that people complain about. Meanwhile, the private dimensions of the healthcare system is what accounts for its merits.
So what are we doing? The very opposite of what we should be doing: more control instead of more freedom, more spending instead of less, more mandates instead of fewer. The logic of interventionism is taking over: problems are being addressed by more of what caused the problems. The sick patient is being given more poison with the claim that it is the cure...."