BINGO.dbackjon wrote:Homosexuality is NOT a learned behavior, unlike religion, prejudice and hatred.
You are either born a c*ck s*cker or a p*ssy muncher.......period.

BINGO.dbackjon wrote:Homosexuality is NOT a learned behavior, unlike religion, prejudice and hatred.

No. The LGBT group is not going around teaching people how to be gay or become gay. Since being gay isn't a choice and is how you are born then there isn't a method to teach and convert a bunch of people to become gay. Maybe they are helping people understand their sexually identities and help those who are ridiculed and hated by their families if they come out be themselves and accept who they are.native wrote:Since the LGBT lobby started aggressively attacking traditional values, especially Christians.slycat wrote:
Since when does anyone want to teach people to be gay? Its all about understanding and respect.
Either you have not paid attention or you are being intentionally disingenuous.


Giving them condoms isn't about making them "go away", it's about controlling an AIDS epidemic. Teaching them to be good catholics and not masturbate or have sex before marriage is NOT going to work, period.JoltinJoe wrote:Jeff, do you think before you write? Look, I know the schtick of your "clan" to blame the church for everything, but these statements are ridiculous. Like most of the "enlightened" Western World, you would rather simply have Africans go away, by "sharing" wth them birth control and abortion to limit their numbers, than actually generously share the resources of the world with them -- as the church urges.D1B wrote:
Africa is dying due to overpopulation and AIDS. The Ugandan law is an unfortunate reaction to this reality: a reality exasperated by the roman catholic church and its policies on condom use and birth control.
When it's all said and done, the roman catholic church will be credited with the deaths of billions in Africa - yet another black mark on the most brutal tyranny mankind has ever witnessed - the roman catholic church.![]()
Joe, nice try.
People die in Africa because it is some body's economic interest for that to happen. And to "solve" this problem, it is much cheaper to give them birth control and abortion than to heed pesky messages about sharing what we have with others.
The Catholic Church is growing rapdily in Africa because, given the choice between the message of the Church and the message of people like you, the African people are responding to the message that tells them that they are a good and worthy people. They understand that the message of the secular western world is that they are burden -- underscored by our willingness to give them birth control and abortion, which says loudly and clearly, "Go away. You are burden to us."
The issue being addressed was "overpopulation," introduced by Jeff in his post. See above (i.e, the one you deleted in your quoting).Grizalltheway wrote:Giving them condoms isn't about making them "go away", it's about controlling an AIDS epidemic. Teaching them to be good catholics and not masturbate or have sex before marriage is NOT going to work, period.JoltinJoe wrote:
Jeff, do you think before you write? Look, I know the schtick of your "clan" to blame the church for everything, but these statements are ridiculous. Like most of the "enlightened" Western World, you would rather simply have Africans go away, by "sharing" wth them birth control and abortion to limit their numbers, than actually generously share the resources of the world with them -- as the church urges.
People die in Africa because it is some body's economic interest for that to happen. And to "solve" this problem, it is much cheaper to give them birth control and abortion than to heed pesky messages about sharing what we have with others.
The Catholic Church is growing rapdily in Africa because, given the choice between the message of the Church and the message of people like you, the African people are responding to the message that tells them that they are a good and worthy people. They understand that the message of the secular western world is that they are burden -- underscored by our willingness to give them birth control and abortion, which says loudly and clearly, "Go away. You are burden to us."

You're not in court Joe, I know what you meant by birth controlJoltinJoe wrote:The issue being addressed was "overpopulation," introduced by Jeff in his post. See above (i.e, the one you deleted in your quoting).Grizalltheway wrote:
Giving them condoms isn't about making them "go away", it's about controlling an AIDS epidemic. Teaching them to be good catholics and not masturbate or have sex before marriage is NOT going to work, period.
The word "condom" appeared nowhere in my reply. Pay attention next time.
It doesn't and that is all that this issue should be about. Civil rights and entitlements that most Americans can take for granted are being denied to you. It is purely a civil issue, not a religious one.dbackjon wrote: How does my quest for equality affect ANYONE else?
My point is precisely that this is the way you see it: the people in Africa are "ignorant" and you think we'd all be better off without them around.Grizalltheway wrote:You're not in court Joe, I know what you meant by birth controlJoltinJoe wrote:
The issue being addressed was "overpopulation," introduced by Jeff in his post. See above (i.e, the one you deleted in your quoting).
The word "condom" appeared nowhere in my reply. Pay attention next time.![]()
. Also, overpopulation IS an issue when a country can't support the people it already has. Of course, Catholics would prefer that they keep multiplying like rabbits so they can have more ignorant souls to "save".
JoltinJoe wrote:My point is precisely that this is the way you see it: the people in Africa are "ignorant" and you think we'd all be better off without them around.Grizalltheway wrote:
You're not in court Joe, I know what you meant by birth control![]()
. Also, overpopulation IS an issue when a country can't support the people it already has. Of course, Catholics would prefer that they keep multiplying like rabbits so they can have more ignorant souls to "save".
My point: the people in Africa are not ignorant; and they fully understand what you are getting at. That's why they are joining the Church in droves, and rejecting your offers of abortion and contraceptives.

And what is this explosion in church membership doing to stem the rising tsunami of AIDS and HIV, Joe?JoltinJoe wrote:My point is precisely that this is the way you see it: the people in Africa are "ignorant" and you think we'd all be better off without them around.Grizalltheway wrote:
You're not in court Joe, I know what you meant by birth control![]()
. Also, overpopulation IS an issue when a country can't support the people it already has. Of course, Catholics would prefer that they keep multiplying like rabbits so they can have more ignorant souls to "save".
My point: the people in Africa are not ignorant; and they fully understand what you are getting at. That's why they are joining the Church in droves, and rejecting your offers of abortion and contraceptives.
JoltinJoe wrote:My point is precisely that this is the way you see it: the people in Africa are "ignorant" and you think we'd all be better off without them around.Grizalltheway wrote:
You're not in court Joe, I know what you meant by birth control![]()
. Also, overpopulation IS an issue when a country can't support the people it already has. Of course, Catholics would prefer that they keep multiplying like rabbits so they can have more ignorant souls to "save".
My point: the people in Africa are not ignorant; and they fully understand what you are getting at. That's why they are joining the Church in droves, and rejecting your offers of abortion and contraceptives.
It is astounding that you apparently do not even perceive the haughty paternalism which is quite obvious in your outlook on these issues. Where are you getting your information? Do you ever communicate with families in Africa?D1B wrote:JoltinJoe wrote:
My point is precisely that this is the way you see it: the people in Africa are "ignorant" and you think we'd all be better off without them around.
My point: the people in Africa are not ignorant; and they fully understand what you are getting at. That's why they are joining the Church in droves, and rejecting your offers of abortion and contraceptives.
Oh Bullshit Joe. The church preys on the poor. They are "joining" the church because the church gives them food and at the same time sells them a load of **** called the New Testament.
Joe, you aint in court and you certainly aint fooling anyone.
It's the other way around. There is no organization in the world which has committed more resources to combat the problems of HIV in Africa than the Catholic Church. The swell in Church membership results because the African people appreciate genuine assistance and solutions, rather than haughty paternalism which supposes that they are -- in your own words -- "ignorant souls."Grizalltheway wrote:And what is this explosion in church membership doing to stem the rising tsunami of AIDS and HIV, Joe?JoltinJoe wrote:
My point is precisely that this is the way you see it: the people in Africa are "ignorant" and you think we'd all be better off without them around.
My point: the people in Africa are not ignorant; and they fully understand what you are getting at. That's why they are joining the Church in droves, and rejecting your offers of abortion and contraceptives.
JoltinJoe wrote:It is astounding that you apparently do not even perceive the haughty paternalism which is quite obvious in your outlook on these issues. Where are you getting your information? Do you ever communicate with families in Africa?D1B wrote:
Oh Bullshit Joe. The church preys on the poor. They are "joining" the church because the church gives them food and at the same time sells them a load of **** called the New Testament.
Joe, you aint in court and you certainly aint fooling anyone.
D1B wrote:JoltinJoe wrote:
It is astounding that you apparently do not even perceive the haughty paternalism which is quite obvious in your outlook on these issues. Where are you getting your information? Do you ever communicate with families in Africa?
Nice try Joe. Next....

And how is the pope telling them not to use condoms, a proven method in combating HIV, helping the HIV problem?JoltinJoe wrote:It's the other way around. There is no organization in the world which has committed more resources to combat the problems of HIV in Africa than the Catholic Church. The swell in Church membership results because the African people appreciate genuine assistance and solutions, rather than haughty paternalism which supposes that they are -- in your own words -- "ignorant souls."Grizalltheway wrote:
And what is this explosion in church membership doing to stem the rising tsunami of AIDS and HIV, Joe?
Use of a condom reduces the risk of transmission of HIV in any single sexual encounter. However, it is doubtful that the wide-scale acceptance of condoms as a tool to fight HIV will decrease the total number of HIV transmissions. Follow the map. Condoms reduce the risk by 98%; but if 100 HIV-infected people have encounters using a condom, believing their conduct is safe, you have likely created 2 new HIV cases. This is why I call condom use "somewhat safer sex" rather than "safe sex." It is not entirely safe, as the term "safe sex" reasonably implies.Grizalltheway wrote:And how is the pope telling them not to use condoms, a proven method in combating HIV, helping the HIV problem?JoltinJoe wrote:
It's the other way around. There is no organization in the world which has committed more resources to combat the problems of HIV in Africa than the Catholic Church. The swell in Church membership results because the African people appreciate genuine assistance and solutions, rather than haughty paternalism which supposes that they are -- in your own words -- "ignorant souls."

As long as most African countries are desperately poor, they'll continue to have a lot of sex, with a lot of different people. What else are you going to do when you don't have a job, food, or even electronic entertainment like the western world? In fact, I believe the Indian government recently started an initiative to give televisions to as many people as possible in an effort to slow down over-population.JoltinJoe wrote:Use of a condom reduces the risk of transmission of HIV in any single sexual encounter. However, it is doubtful that the wide-scale acceptance of condoms as a tool to fight HIV will decrease the total number of HIV transmissions. Follow the map. Condoms reduce the risk by 98%; but if 100 HIV-infected people have encounters using a condom, believing their conduct is safe, you have likely created 2 new HIV cases. This is why I call condom use "somewhat safer sex" rather than "safe sex." It is not entirely safe, as the term "safe sex" reasonably implies.Grizalltheway wrote:
And how is the pope telling them not to use condoms, a proven method in combating HIV, helping the HIV problem?
You probably won't accept this. But then again, the intellectual elite laughed at the Pope's observation in Humanae Vitae that the wide-scale use of contraceptives would actually increase the number of unwanted pregnanices. We now have 40 years of data to prove that the Pope was right.
You aren't aware of the dramatic increase in unwanted pregnancies in the US in the past 40 years?Grizalltheway wrote: But anyway, I'd be interested to see this 40 years worth of data supporting the pope's theory that the use of contraception increases the number of unwanted pregnancies, Joe.

Again, data would be nice...JoltinJoe wrote:You aren't aware of the dramatic increase in unwanted pregnancies in the US in the past 40 years?Grizalltheway wrote: But anyway, I'd be interested to see this 40 years worth of data supporting the pope's theory that the use of contraception increases the number of unwanted pregnancies, Joe.
http://www.virginia.edu/marriageproject ... gnancy.pdfGrizalltheway wrote:Again, data would be nice...JoltinJoe wrote:
You aren't aware of the dramatic increase in unwanted pregnancies in the US in the past 40 years?

Clenz, it might have been before your time but, historically, Christianity (being the dominant religion in America like Islam is in Middle East) was at the forefront of both ostraciszing gays & criminalizing their behavior. That's wonderful you are participating in GLBT support organizations. But I doubt it would be a stretch to assume that your view is probably in the minority at your place of worship...certainly with the over-35 crowd in your congregation. Sure, DBack may have over-generalized, but no more than others on this thread. Assuming that Jon, or any other gay man pursuing equal rights & access afforded to others in our society, is also pursuing indoctrinating or teaching children to be gay is a more damming over-generalization IMO (not directed at you).....clenz wrote:You didn't state that you were going after a smaller number of them. You just generalized Christians. I was actually on the GLBT Commitie at Hawkeye CC before I graduated. I have attended UNI Proud meetings (the GLBT group on campus).dbackjon wrote:
Did I say EVERY Christian? Nope. Are there Christians in the US that would like to do the same? Very much so.
Just like not every Muslim wants to kill Americans, some Muslims do.
I'm sure you didn't mean to generalize like that, but as a Christian who fully supports gay marriage and rights I hate being lumped in with those that don't.

That's your religious gospel and you stick to it no matter what.mainejeff wrote:BINGO.dbackjon wrote:Homosexuality is NOT a learned behavior, unlike religion, prejudice and hatred.
You are either born a c*ck s*cker or a p*ssy muncher.......period.
JoltinJoe wrote:http://www.virginia.edu/marriageproject ... gnancy.pdfGrizalltheway wrote:
Again, data would be nice...

It's not religious gospel.......it is nature, genetics, biology. Sorry if you don't understand those terms.native wrote:That's your religious gospel and you stick to it no matter what.mainejeff wrote:
BINGO.
You are either born a c*ck s*cker or a p*ssy muncher.......period.