A Permanent Olympic Site?

All other sports including pro, high school and more!
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by 89Hen »

dbackjon wrote:And one of the big costs of the Olympics is always the transportation infrastructure, which still should be good
What type of transportation infrastructure do they build?
Image
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by dbackjon »

89Hen wrote:
dbackjon wrote:And one of the big costs of the Olympics is always the transportation infrastructure, which still should be good
What type of transportation infrastructure do they build?
London is building new subway lines, new rail lines, etc.

Athens built an entire subway system.
:thumb:
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by 89Hen »

dbackjon wrote:London is building new subway lines, new rail lines, etc.

Athens built an entire subway system.
I guess my question is, would they be used between olympics? I would guess that the extensions to the Athens lines led to the new stadiums which are now vacant.
Image
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by dbackjon »

89Hen wrote:
dbackjon wrote:London is building new subway lines, new rail lines, etc.

Athens built an entire subway system.
I guess my question is, would they be used between olympics? I would guess that the extensions to the Athens lines led to the new stadiums which are now vacant.

Athens didn't HAVE a subway system before...
:thumb:
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by 89Hen »

dbackjon wrote:Athens didn't HAVE a subway system before...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athens_Metro

"Construction of Metro Lines 2 and 3 began in November 1991 to decrease traffic congestion and clean up the environment by reducing Athens' smog level. Lines 2 and 3, constructed by Attiko Metro S.A. and operated by Attiko Metro Operations Company S.A. and known as red and blue lines respectively, were inaugurated in January 2000"
Image
User avatar
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
Posts: 20856
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
I am a fan of: Sac State
Location: Twentynine Palms, CA

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by SuperHornet »

Grizo406 wrote:Having been to Chattanooga once, I fell in love with the place!

I think Chattanooga should considered for any/all future Olympics!

In your face, Frisco! :coffee:
Forget both, Grizomatic. I'd MUCH rather see the title game in some place like Missoula. Of course, as much hype as the Missoula bid got, the NCAA will trash all such bids for the same bloody reason the NFL won't stage a Super Bowl in Green Bay or Buffalo: snow, or the perception of it. They want climes where there's a very good chance that it will be completely sunny, or at least nothing worse than a bit of rain. And that's completely wrong. What's wrong with bad-weather football? As far as I'm concerned, that's just a bit more fun, but nobody in charge cares about fun anymore.
Image

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
Franks Tanks
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:36 am
I am a fan of: Lafayette College
A.K.A.: Big Sexy

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by Franks Tanks »

SuperHornet wrote:
Grizo406 wrote:Having been to Chattanooga once, I fell in love with the place!

I think Chattanooga should considered for any/all future Olympics!

In your face, Frisco! :coffee:
Forget both, Grizomatic. I'd MUCH rather see the title game in some place like Missoula. Of course, as much hype as the Missoula bid got, the NCAA will trash all such bids for the same bloody reason the NFL won't stage a Super Bowl in Green Bay or Buffalo: snow, or the perception of it. They want climes where there's a very good chance that it will be completely sunny, or at least nothing worse than a bit of rain. And that's completely wrong. What's wrong with bad-weather football? As far as I'm concerned, that's just a bit more fun, but nobody in charge cares about fun anymore.
Football is not meant to be played in the snow. It severly reduces the quality of play.

We wait all year and play a pile a games to figure out the best two teams. I want those teams to show their skill and have a clean field to play on. It no fun watching the two best teams slide around in the snow while playing for a championship.
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by 93henfan »

Franks Tanks wrote:
Football is not meant to be played in the snow. It severly reduces the quality of play.

We wait all year and play a pile a games to figure out the best two teams. I want those teams to show their skill and have a clean field to play on. It no fun watching the two best teams slide around in the snow while playing for a championship.
I don't want to take anything away from the 2003 Colgate squad (or Delaware's championship that year), but didn't Colgate upset some teams in some heavy snow that year? IIRC, they had a stud RB that they handed the ball off to a gazillion times in heavy snow to get to Chatty, and the Hens just exposed them on a clear field.

Snow takes so much away from a speed/skillz team, as opposed to a power team.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by dbackjon »

93henfan wrote:
Franks Tanks wrote:
Football is not meant to be played in the snow. It severly reduces the quality of play.

We wait all year and play a pile a games to figure out the best two teams. I want those teams to show their skill and have a clean field to play on. It no fun watching the two best teams slide around in the snow while playing for a championship.
I don't want to take anything away from the 2003 Colgate squad (or Delaware's championship that year), but didn't Colgate upset some teams in some heavy snow that year? IIRC, they had a stud RB that they handed the ball off to a gazillion times in heavy snow to get to Chatty, and the Hens just exposed them on a clear field.

Snow takes so much away from a speed/skillz team, as opposed to a power team.
Yes, Colgate beat the very talented and FAST FAU squad that demolished NAU in the Skydome the week before (and this after NAU beat the #1 team in the nation by 35 in the opening round).
:thumb:
User avatar
kardplayer
Level1
Level1
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:07 pm
I am a fan of: Lehigh

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by kardplayer »

dbackjon wrote:
93henfan wrote:
I don't want to take anything away from the 2003 Colgate squad (or Delaware's championship that year), but didn't Colgate upset some teams in some heavy snow that year? IIRC, they had a stud RB that they handed the ball off to a gazillion times in heavy snow to get to Chatty, and the Hens just exposed them on a clear field.

Snow takes so much away from a speed/skillz team, as opposed to a power team.
Yes, Colgate beat the very talented and FAST FAU squad that demolished NAU in the Skydome the week before (and this after NAU beat the #1 team in the nation by 35 in the opening round).
Colgate beat FAU in Florida - they didn't put a bid in to host the semifinal. Definitely no snow there.

IIRC, Western Illinois was a heavy snow game and UMass may have been as well.
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by dbackjon »

kardplayer wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
Yes, Colgate beat the very talented and FAST FAU squad that demolished NAU in the Skydome the week before (and this after NAU beat the #1 team in the nation by 35 in the opening round).
Colgate beat FAU in Florida - they didn't put a bid in to host the semifinal. Definitely no snow there.

IIRC, Western Illinois was a heavy snow game and UMass may have been as well.
You are correct. Colgate hosted UMass and WIU, then traveled to Ft Lauderdale
:thumb:
Franks Tanks
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:36 am
I am a fan of: Lafayette College
A.K.A.: Big Sexy

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by Franks Tanks »

dbackjon wrote:
kardplayer wrote:
Colgate beat FAU in Florida - they didn't put a bid in to host the semifinal. Definitely no snow there.

IIRC, Western Illinois was a heavy snow game and UMass may have been as well.
You are correct. Colgate hosted UMass and WIU, then traveled to Ft Lauderdale
Yes. The WIU game was in heavy snow. I think it may have snowed for UMASS, but I dont recall the snow being very heavy.
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by 89Hen »

Franks Tanks wrote:Yes. The WIU game was in heavy snow. I think it may have snowed for UMASS, but I dont recall the snow being very heavy.
I seem to recall UMass having a heck of a time even getting to Colgate that year because of the snow.
Image
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19231
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: A Permanent Olympic Site?

Post by GannonFan »

89Hen wrote:
Franks Tanks wrote:Yes. The WIU game was in heavy snow. I think it may have snowed for UMASS, but I dont recall the snow being very heavy.
I seem to recall UMass having a heck of a time even getting to Colgate that year because of the snow.
Nah - that was just UMass whining about having to go on the road period. They never got past the initial anger of having to play a road game and it came up and bit them against Colgate. UMass wasn't far behind UD that year, and UD couldn't have stomped Colgate any more than they did - UMass just didn't take care of business in that first round game.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Post Reply