Verdict is in for Roger
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Verdict is in for Roger
What will it be?
I say not guilty because he lied to a bunch of cheating, thieving liars.
I say not guilty because he lied to a bunch of cheating, thieving liars.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
Not guilty it is.
-
dal4018
- Level5

- Posts: 10680
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: South Carolina St
- A.K.A.: SC State
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
Agreed can't believe a guy who used a word like misremembered got off Scott free!!!!!dbackjon wrote:Still a guilty scum bag in my book.
-
dal4018
- Level5

- Posts: 10680
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: South Carolina St
- A.K.A.: SC State
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
He was found not guilty saw it on twitter!!!Grizalltheway wrote:Not guilty it is.
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
What happens now when Roger stands for election to the Hall of Fame? Based on the numbers, he's in, so any voter who doesn't vote for him will be doing based on a belief that he used PEDs. It will be interesting to see how many voters will, in coming years, disregard Roger's assertion that he was found "not guilty."dbackjon wrote:Still a guilty scum bag in my book.
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45623
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
JoltinJoe wrote:What happens now when Roger stands for election to the Hall of Fame? Based on the numbers, he's in, so any voter who doesn't vote for him will be doing based on a belief that he used PEDs. It will be interesting to see how many voters will, in coming years, disregard Roger's assertion that he was found "not guilty."dbackjon wrote:Still a guilty scum bag in my book.
He will get in, IMHO - but hopefully they make him wait
-
Ivytalk
- Supporter

- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
While they're at it, let Pete Rose in.
Saw him in Vegas. Signing autographs for money.
Saw him in Vegas. Signing autographs for money.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter

- Posts: 31512
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
He'll get in someday, but will have to wait with the other steroid bastians like McGwire, Bonds, Palmeiro, Sosa etc.

Re: Verdict is in for Roger
That's like someone questioning the definition of the word "is".dal4018 wrote:Agreed can't believe a guy who used a word like misremembered got off Scott free!!!!!dbackjon wrote:Still a guilty scum bag in my book.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
Ha.Ibanez wrote:That's like someone questioning the definition of the word "is".dal4018 wrote:Agreed can't believe a guy who used a word like misremembered got off Scott free!!!!!
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
-
CAA Flagship
- 4th&29

- Posts: 38528
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
Good93henfan wrote:Ha.Ibanez wrote:
That's like someone questioning the definition of the word "is".
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
Won.CAA Flagship wrote:Good93henfan wrote:
Ha.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
McGwire is never getting in. Bonds will eventually get in. And I don't think either Palmeiro or Sosa will get in.He'll get in someday, but will have to wait with the other steroid bastians like McGwire, Bonds, Palmeiro, Sosa etc.

- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet

- Posts: 20856
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
Would you care to explain that? During his career, McGwire never burned the sportswriter bridges that Bonds did.Seahawks08 wrote:McGwire is never getting in. Bonds will eventually get in. And I don't think either Palmeiro or Sosa will get in.He'll get in someday, but will have to wait with the other steroid bastians like McGwire, Bonds, Palmeiro, Sosa etc.
While it will be tough for ANYONE caught up in the juice mess to get in, I think McGwire's road should be easier than the others for that reason alone. As far as Palmiero, all anyone will remember is that stupid finger he waved while lying to Congress. I'm not sure about Sosa, but he probably doesn't have the numbers; if I remember right, he suffered a HUGE drop-off after he quit the juice.

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
If we're setting the roids issue aside, how does 609 homers and 2,400 hits not get him in?SuperHornet wrote:Would you care to explain that? During his career, McGwire never burned the sportswriter bridges that Bonds did.Seahawks08 wrote:
McGwire is never getting in. Bonds will eventually get in. And I don't think either Palmeiro or Sosa will get in.
While it will be tough for ANYONE caught up in the juice mess to get in, I think McGwire's road should be easier than the others for that reason alone. As far as Palmiero, all anyone will remember is that stupid finger he waved while lying to Congress. I'm not sure about Sosa, but he probably doesn't have the numbers; if I remember right, he suffered a HUGE drop-off after he quit the juice.
-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
McGwire's main numbers that would get him into the HoF would be the power ones. And those would have been skewed the most.
Sosa is close to the same with a little more hits. His cork bat incident won't help either.
And after looking at Palmeiro's numbers, I think he should get in, but I'm not sure he could get enough votes. He has the same argument Bonds has with his numbers being so good. Basically, what I'm saying is that even without steroids, both Bonds and Palmeiro would have been HoFers. Same goes for Arod.
Sosa is close to the same with a little more hits. His cork bat incident won't help either.
And after looking at Palmeiro's numbers, I think he should get in, but I'm not sure he could get enough votes. He has the same argument Bonds has with his numbers being so good. Basically, what I'm saying is that even without steroids, both Bonds and Palmeiro would have been HoFers. Same goes for Arod.

-
dal4018
- Level5

- Posts: 10680
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: South Carolina St
- A.K.A.: SC State
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
And he gave some of this stuff to his wife as well.Ibanez wrote:That's like someone questioning the definition of the word "is".dal4018 wrote:Agreed can't believe a guy who used a word like misremembered got off Scott free!!!!!
- bluehenbillk
- Level4

- Posts: 7660
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
- I am a fan of: elaware
- Location: East Coast/Hawaii
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
It will be a full generation IF any of those guys EVER make the Hall.
Bonds, ARod, McGwire, Sosa, Clemens, Palmiero, they are all the poster boys of the steroid generation. All of them have "HOF Numbers", but the writers have already spoken and none of these guys have got a sniff close to being voted in, nor will they.
I think the way the voting goes is you get a 15-year window as long as you get x percent of votes each year, after that it goes to a veterans committee. If they're not going to let Pete in, I don't see how these guys ever get in either....
Bonds, ARod, McGwire, Sosa, Clemens, Palmiero, they are all the poster boys of the steroid generation. All of them have "HOF Numbers", but the writers have already spoken and none of these guys have got a sniff close to being voted in, nor will they.
I think the way the voting goes is you get a 15-year window as long as you get x percent of votes each year, after that it goes to a veterans committee. If they're not going to let Pete in, I don't see how these guys ever get in either....
Make Delaware Football Great Again
- andy7171
- Firefly

- Posts: 27951
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
- I am a fan of: Wiping.
- A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
- Location: Eastern Palouse
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
How does 609 homeruns not qualify for the Hall of Fame?SuperHornet wrote:Would you care to explain that? During his career, McGwire never burned the sportswriter bridges that Bonds did.Seahawks08 wrote:
McGwire is never getting in. Bonds will eventually get in. And I don't think either Palmeiro or Sosa will get in.
While it will be tough for ANYONE caught up in the juice mess to get in, I think McGwire's road should be easier than the others for that reason alone. As far as Palmiero, all anyone will remember is that stupid finger he waved while lying to Congress. I'm not sure about Sosa, but he probably doesn't have the numbers; if I remember right, he suffered a HUGE drop-off after he quit the juice.
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
- TheDancinMonarch
- Supporter

- Posts: 4779
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:23 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- Location: Norfolk VA
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
Rose should get in as should Clemens. But not while they are alive. Neither should have the satisfaction of knowing that they made it to the Hall of Fame. That should be their punishment.Ivytalk wrote:While they're at it, let Pete Rose in.
Saw him in Vegas. Signing autographs for money.
And what kind of crime is "lying to Congress"? Shouldn't it be a crime for Congress to lie to us?
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet

- Posts: 20856
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
That's a completely different issue, Hen. It's not the writers nor the Veterans Committee that hasn't let Pete in. It's that stupid ex post facto law the idiots Bart Giamatti and Fay Vincent unilaterally passed that keeps him out. Nobody really knows how a vote including Rose would go, and we'll NEVER know until that asinine bullcr@p gets repealed.bluehenbillk wrote:It will be a full generation IF any of those guys EVER make the Hall.
Bonds, ARod, McGwire, Sosa, Clemens, Palmiero, they are all the poster boys of the steroid generation. All of them have "HOF Numbers", but the writers have already spoken and none of these guys have got a sniff close to being voted in, nor will they.
I think the way the voting goes is you get a 15-year window as long as you get x percent of votes each year, after that it goes to a veterans committee. If they're not going to let Pete in, I don't see how these guys ever get in either....

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
Point of clarification....
He was found not guilty of perjury....not not guilty of using steroids.
He was found not guilty of perjury....not not guilty of using steroids.
-
dal4018
- Level5

- Posts: 10680
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: South Carolina St
- A.K.A.: SC State
Re: Verdict is in for Roger
Agreed Congress lies to the American ppl in their sleep.TheDancinMonarch wrote:Rose should get in as should Clemens. But not while they are alive. Neither should have the satisfaction of knowing that they made it to the Hall of Fame. That should be their punishment.Ivytalk wrote:While they're at it, let Pete Rose in.
Saw him in Vegas. Signing autographs for money.
And what kind of crime is "lying to Congress"? Shouldn't it be a crime for Congress to lie to us?
