dbackjon wrote:CID1990 wrote:
If you wanted to be productive you'd turn yourself into manure.
I miss Citdog.
I really enjoy all the love from The Citadel. It is really kinda cute - text me dirty pictures at night, act tough on CS during the day.
Love you Citdograd1990!!!
If you support Obama, you support a person with a God (a Christian one, mind you...or a Muslin one) syndrome who kills civilians, ignores the Constitution and Congress, and takes away our personal liberties. That's disgusting.youngterrier wrote:
If you supported Chick-fil-a today, you financially supported campaigns to give the death penalty to people who commit a victimless crime.
How in the fuck is this "libertarian" John? How in the fuck does this fit into your fucking sick and demented definition of "LIBERTEH"?!
I'll give you a hint. It doesn't. You're Disgusting.
, Obama signed a secret 
order to support the rebels in Syria. Those nice rebels...who just executed 14 people....and hanged a civilian. 
Shut the fcuk up?Ibanez wrote:Will you guys shut the fuck up about this? We have more important things to worry about in the country.
I actually agree with you Cluck. This is so stupid and meaningless.Cluck U wrote:Shut the fcuk up?Ibanez wrote:Will you guys shut the fuck up about this? We have more important things to worry about in the country.
Your intolerance in showing again. Have you tried banning anyone?
Ibanez wrote:Will you guys shut the **** up about this? We have more important things to worry about in the country.
More important than praying god's mercy on the heathen gays?
dbackjon wrote:JohnStOnge wrote:
Most of them probably already have health insurance as they are productive members of society who aren't constantly looking to the government as some kind of Father Figure. At least most of them who were out today making a statement are probably like that.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nati ... 0469.story" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If they were productive members of society, they wouldh't have hours to waste in line.
bluehenbillk wrote:My own personal opinion:
If more people would have the Spicy Asiago Ranch Chicken Sandwich at Wendy's, Chick-Fil-A would be in much deeper trouble than they are now.
Love the line at the end...."oh by the way I'm totally heterosexual, no gay in me in any way..."andy7171 wrote:This guy isn't too much of an asshole.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPLNgkP9nzc[/youtube]
Absolutely!Baldy wrote:Love the line at the end...."oh by the way I'm totally heterosexual, no gay in me in any way..."andy7171 wrote:This guy isn't too much of an asshole.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPLNgkP9nzc[/youtube]
Total homo....
BOOM! It is sad.Grizalltheway wrote:The more I think about this whole thing, the more ridiculous it seems. Only in America would a fast food chicken joint become the centerpiece of an important social discussion.
I've never set it up on CS.grizzaholic wrote:TOD...where is your avatar? Did you get your tattoo removed?Tod wrote:JCPenney was boycotted just for hiring Ellen DeGeneras, they didn't even take a stand on gay issues.
What if someone just likes their chicken sandwiches? I'm guessing there are other companies that donate money to organizations I disagree with. Would you please post an image showing where all privately held companies donate their money? That would be helpful.youngterrier wrote:
If you supported Chick-fil-a today, you financially supported campaigns to give the death penalty to people who commit a victimless crime.
How in the **** is this "libertarian" John? How in the **** does this fit into your **** sick and demented definition of "LIBERTEH"?!
I'll give you a hint. It doesn't. You're Disgusting.
Believes broadcasters should not be allowed to transmit content that is opposes Christian values.
Your business is his business.ASUMountaineer wrote:What if someone just likes their chicken sandwiches? I'm guessing there are other companies that donate money to organizations I disagree with. Would you please post an image showing where all privately held companies donate their money? That would be helpful.youngterrier wrote:
If you supported Chick-fil-a today, you financially supported campaigns to give the death penalty to people who commit a victimless crime.
How in the **** is this "libertarian" John? How in the **** does this fit into your **** sick and demented definition of "LIBERTEH"?!
I'll give you a hint. It doesn't. You're Disgusting.
I'm not defending Chick-fil-a. If you don't want to go there, good on you. I am amazed that people hold such disdain about where someone else picks up fast food.
Why much anger, YT? Is it necessary to call names?
My bad.Ibanez wrote:Your business is his business.ASUMountaineer wrote:
What if someone just likes their chicken sandwiches? I'm guessing there are other companies that donate money to organizations I disagree with. Would you please post an image showing where all privately held companies donate their money? That would be helpful.
I'm not defending Chick-fil-a. If you don't want to go there, good on you. I am amazed that people hold such disdain about where someone else picks up fast food.
Why much anger, YT? Is it necessary to call names?
If I knew anymore that directly made contributions to such organizations, I would certainly post them. Heck, I already boycotted the salvation army.ASUMountaineer wrote:What if someone just likes their chicken sandwiches? I'm guessing there are other companies that donate money to organizations I disagree with. Would you please post an image showing where all privately held companies donate their money? That would be helpful.youngterrier wrote:
If you supported Chick-fil-a today, you financially supported campaigns to give the death penalty to people who commit a victimless crime.
How in the **** is this "libertarian" John? How in the **** does this fit into your **** sick and demented definition of "LIBERTEH"?!
I'll give you a hint. It doesn't. You're Disgusting.
I'm not defending Chick-fil-a. If you don't want to go there, good on you. I am amazed that people hold such disdain about where someone else picks up fast food.
Why much anger, YT? Is it necessary to call names?
What is "disgusting" is the bad grammar and inconsistent punctuation used in the image. Shame.
Believes broadcasters should not be allowed to transmit content that is opposes Christian values.
You (we) would probably all be amazed and/or appalled if we knew half of what some companies contribute....if there's an industry, there's probably a lobby either tied directly to the industry or a lobbyist that supports the wishes of management on social issues. You can't boycott everything.youngterrier wrote:If I knew anymore that directly made contributions to such organizations, I would certainly post them. Heck, I already boycotted the salvation army.ASUMountaineer wrote:
What if someone just likes their chicken sandwiches? I'm guessing there are other companies that donate money to organizations I disagree with. Would you please post an image showing where all privately held companies donate their money? That would be helpful.
I'm not defending Chick-fil-a. If you don't want to go there, good on you. I am amazed that people hold such disdain about where someone else picks up fast food.
Why much anger, YT? Is it necessary to call names?
What is "disgusting" is the bad grammar and inconsistent punctuation used in the image. Shame.
the point is, you spend at chick-fil-a, they spend money on the vilest of organizations that lobby for the taking away of rights. You're essentially bankrolling the operation by giving Chic-fil-a business.
I'm not even acknowledging Cluck's response because the logic is astronomically bad
I doubt many industries donate to exodus international, the family research council, etc. I understand there are a lot of industries that contribute to causes I don't agree with. With that said, I think the above mentioned are probably worse because they've endorsed the freaking death penalty on people.ASUG8 wrote:You (we) would probably all be amazed and/or appalled if we knew half of what some companies contribute....if there's an industry, there's probably a lobby either tied directly to the industry or a lobbyist that supports the wishes of management on social issues. You can't boycott everything.youngterrier wrote:
If I knew anymore that directly made contributions to such organizations, I would certainly post them. Heck, I already boycotted the salvation army.
the point is, you spend at chick-fil-a, they spend money on the vilest of organizations that lobby for the taking away of rights. You're essentially bankrolling the operation by giving Chic-fil-a business.
I'm not even acknowledging Cluck's response because the logic is astronomically bad
Why "such organizations?" What you find "disgusting" others may not (and vice versa).youngterrier wrote:If I knew anymore that directly made contributions to such organizations, I would certainly post them. Heck, I already boycotted the salvation army.ASUMountaineer wrote:
What if someone just likes their chicken sandwiches? I'm guessing there are other companies that donate money to organizations I disagree with. Would you please post an image showing where all privately held companies donate their money? That would be helpful.
I'm not defending Chick-fil-a. If you don't want to go there, good on you. I am amazed that people hold such disdain about where someone else picks up fast food.
Why much anger, YT? Is it necessary to call names?
What is "disgusting" is the bad grammar and inconsistent punctuation used in the image. Shame.
the point is, you spend at chick-fil-a, they spend money on the vilest of organizations that lobby for the taking away of rights. You're essentially bankrolling the operation by giving Chic-fil-a business.
I'm not even acknowledging Cluck's response because the logic is astronomically bad
Ignorance is our friend. I didn't know who Chick-fil-a gave their money to, but when I heard it was these groups, I'm not going to send my money to them. We may not know where every company moves money, but the point is that we know where Chick-fil-a does, so I'm not going to support them anymore. I'm disparaging people going there to spite people like me, but because of their ignorance of what people like me are actually saying.ASUMountaineer wrote:Why "such organizations?" What you find "disgusting" others may not (and vice versa).youngterrier wrote:
If I knew anymore that directly made contributions to such organizations, I would certainly post them. Heck, I already boycotted the salvation army.
the point is, you spend at chick-fil-a, they spend money on the vilest of organizations that lobby for the taking away of rights. You're essentially bankrolling the operation by giving Chic-fil-a business.
I'm not even acknowledging Cluck's response because the logic is astronomically bad
I'm looking for a list of organizations receiving donations from all privately held companies. That way, we all can boycott every company to our hearts' desires.
I am not setting out to support those organizations and if my money unknowingly gets funneled to some organization I don't support (i.e., United Way), so be it.
The point is, that you can't possibly know where every company moves money. To use a fast food restaurant as a way to criticize social positions seems ridiculous to me. Like I said, if you don't want to patronize Chick-fil-a, good on you. I just think it's petty to disparage someone for going to a fast food chain (especially when there's so many better reasons to disparage JSO). I'll state again that I think it's sad that fast food has become the "ground zero" of social debate in our country.
