- AC Philadelphia
- SC Philadelphia
- Philadelphia Union
- Philadelphia City
Vancouver Whitecaps 2011
http://www.whitecapsfc.com/home.aspx
Portland Timbers 2011
http://www.portlandtimbers.com/









They will have a naming contest I'm sure in the fall or next year. I hope they keep Whitecaps but htey really need to update the logo.dgreco wrote:I like Philly Union too.
Also, I thought Vancouver was having a naming contest so we might see their name change by they start in the MLS. I like their name so I hope that it wins the contest. I would also be happy with something like Vancouver Whitecaps FC or something.





I just do not feel like going to photobucket everytime I want to post a picture or something. This is the only forum I have ever seen where a picture doesn't get auto-resized and then you can click on it to see the full size.dbackjon wrote:Dgreco - if you open a photobucket account, you can auto resize that way. I know, a few steps more...


Not true - I tested your files at AGS, and another vbulletin site I frequent - previewed the posts, and both were just as large at both other sites as here.dgreco wrote:I just do not feel like going to photobucket everytime I want to post a picture or something. This is the only forum I have ever seen where a picture doesn't get auto-resized and then you can click on it to see the full size.dbackjon wrote:Dgreco - if you open a photobucket account, you can auto resize that way. I know, a few steps more...


Hmm - no images when I click on the link - just links to other images - do I need to be registered?dgreco wrote:I go to chris creamers sports logos, urbanplanet.org, d2football, and sometimes check out marlinsbaseball.com and they all autoresize the picture.
http://boards.sportslogos.net/index.php?showtopic=65708
quick example of the resize. It is extremely convenient.

sentiment among most is to follow the lead of Seattle and Portland and save the familiar name but the decision has not been made yet.slycat wrote:They will have a naming contest I'm sure in the fall or next year. I hope they keep Whitecaps but they really need to update the logo.dgreco wrote:I like Philly Union too.
Also, I thought Vancouver was having a naming contest so we might see their name change by they start in the MLS. I like their name so I hope that it wins the contest. I would also be happy with something like Vancouver Whitecaps FC or something.








I'm confused by that as well. FIFA says they only will allow 20 teams. I think its to keep the market from becoming saturated and allowing the league to collapse.dbackjon wrote:Explain this FIFA limit of 20 teams please.


I'm think they will go to a single table system.dgreco wrote:By 2011 do you think we will see the two texas teams move east? Or will they have an unbalanced conference alignment?


Found thisslycat wrote:I'm confused by that as well. FIFA says they only will allow 20 teams. I think its to keep the market from becoming saturated and allowing the league to collapse.dbackjon wrote:Explain this FIFA limit of 20 teams please.

I agree Jon. The US is much larger. However soccer is not nearly as well embraced from in US/Canada so its tougher to sell games. It is catching on quickly though and making great progress. I say stop at 20 teams for a while and let the league develop. The problem we will run into is having enough talent to go around. The MLS has a salary cap will many overseas leagues do not. This makes it hard to keep quality players in the MLS.dbackjon wrote:Found thisslycat wrote:
I'm confused by that as well. FIFA says they only will allow 20 teams. I think its to keep the market from becoming saturated and allowing the league to collapse.
- FIFA president Sepp Blatter has stated his desire to implement a radical proposal that would limit Europe’s domestic leagues to a maximum of 16 teams.
In an interview with Germany’s Bild newspaper Thursday, the 69-year-old Blatter also hinted that he would push for greater restrictions on foreign players in these leagues at next year’s FIFA Congress.
“Ideally, each national league would have 16 teams,” Blatter said. “At our congress in 2007 we will discuss this, as the market and the players cannot cope with so much football.”
The Bundesliga currently has 18 teams, while the top leagues in Spain, England, Italy and France have 20.
The 20 team limit might work for European countries - but to me, that is impractial in North America, which is much larger geographically than Europe. It is assinine to say that England, which is tiny, could have as many teams in one league and all of Canada/United States.


Which is true - but is 20 the right number for US/Canada?slycat wrote:I agree Jon. The US is much larger. However soccer is not nearly as well embraced from in US/Canada so its tougher to sell games. It is catching on quickly though and making great progress. I say stop at 20 teams for a while and let the league develop. The problem we will run into is having enough talent to go around. The MLS has a salary cap will many overseas leagues do not. This makes it hard to keep quality players in the MLS.dbackjon wrote:
Found this
- FIFA president Sepp Blatter has stated his desire to implement a radical proposal that would limit Europe’s domestic leagues to a maximum of 16 teams.
In an interview with Germany’s Bild newspaper Thursday, the 69-year-old Blatter also hinted that he would push for greater restrictions on foreign players in these leagues at next year’s FIFA Congress.
“Ideally, each national league would have 16 teams,” Blatter said. “At our congress in 2007 we will discuss this, as the market and the players cannot cope with so much football.”
The Bundesliga currently has 18 teams, while the top leagues in Spain, England, Italy and France have 20.
The 20 team limit might work for European countries - but to me, that is impractial in North America, which is much larger geographically than Europe. It is assinine to say that England, which is tiny, could have as many teams in one league and all of Canada/United States.

For now yes. I think the league should stop when it hits 20 for at least 5 years and see where it is headed. Maybe more expansion will be called for then. I don't think FIFA should have a say in size though.dbackjon wrote:Which is true - but is 20 the right number for US/Canada?slycat wrote:
I agree Jon. The US is much larger. However soccer is not nearly as well embraced from in US/Canada so its tougher to sell games. It is catching on quickly though and making great progress. I say stop at 20 teams for a while and let the league develop. The problem we will run into is having enough talent to go around. The MLS has a salary cap will many overseas leagues do not. This makes it hard to keep quality players in the MLS.



Do you know when this article was written, dback? It says they'll consider this rule at their 2007 meeting...dbackjon wrote:Found thisslycat wrote:
I'm confused by that as well. FIFA says they only will allow 20 teams. I think its to keep the market from becoming saturated and allowing the league to collapse.
- FIFA president Sepp Blatter has stated his desire to implement a radical proposal that would limit Europe’s domestic leagues to a maximum of 16 teams.
In an interview with Germany’s Bild newspaper Thursday, the 69-year-old Blatter also hinted that he would push for greater restrictions on foreign players in these leagues at next year’s FIFA Congress.
“Ideally, each national league would have 16 teams,” Blatter said. “At our congress in 2007 we will discuss this, as the market and the players cannot cope with so much football.”
The Bundesliga currently has 18 teams, while the top leagues in Spain, England, Italy and France have 20.
The 20 team limit might work for European countries - but to me, that is impractial in North America, which is much larger geographically than Europe. It is assinine to say that England, which is tiny, could have as many teams in one league and all of Canada/United States.

