kalm wrote:search.php?author_id=860&sr=posts" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Baldy wrote: Really? Care to provide some examples?![]()
Didn't think so....
kalm wrote:search.php?author_id=860&sr=posts" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Baldy wrote: Really? Care to provide some examples?![]()

New Benghazi Account Bolsters CIA
Intelligence officials have disclosed a new detailed timeline of the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, acknowledging the CIA played a greater role in responding to the attack than has previously been disclosed. A senior U.S. intelligence official also insisted that the CIA security team that initially responded to the attack was not given orders "to stand down in providing support," as had been suggested in media reports.
http://news.yahoo.com/detailed-account- ... itics.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

kalm wrote:And now the CIA and Yahoo news are shilling for the Obama administration...![]()
New Benghazi Account Bolsters CIA
Intelligence officials have disclosed a new detailed timeline of the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, acknowledging the CIA played a greater role in responding to the attack than has previously been disclosed. A senior U.S. intelligence official also insisted that the CIA security team that initially responded to the attack was not given orders "to stand down in providing support," as had been suggested in media reports.
http://news.yahoo.com/detailed-account- ... itics.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Conks and Fox News...politicizing the heroic efforts of our people.Grizalltheway wrote:kalm wrote:And now the CIA and Yahoo news are shilling for the Obama administration...![]()
You mean the guy who isn't running for President? At least vote for a third party that is actively campaigning.Seahawks08 wrote:Inside, you know what you should do...you just aren't mentally strong enough to do it...and your posts on this board prove that to be so.
Sad, really.
Yeah, actually I already voted for Ron Paul, so you can go suck it buddy.

AZGrizFan wrote:Yes. Most of that shit has been Obama-ized and rewritten. Orwell would be very proud.Grizalltheway wrote:
Well shit, historians weren't even alive during most of the events they research and write about. Do you roll your eyes at them, too?

A third party vote is based on principle. None of them are going to win, so I'm voting for the one man I think should be president.You mean the guy who isn't running for President? At least vote for a third party that is actively campaigning.


You shouldn't be saying anything. You have the largest tool on this board.
Accuracy.




You're honestly comparing the two?BlueHen86 wrote:When 9/11/01 happened everyone got behind the President.
When 9/11/12 happened the GOP tried to use it for political gain.


So if a few people die it's okay to exploit it for political gain;89Hen wrote:You're honestly comparing the two?BlueHen86 wrote:When 9/11/01 happened everyone got behind the President.
When 9/11/12 happened the GOP tried to use it for political gain.

Yeah, because Obama's photo op in the Situation Room wasn't political at all.BlueHen86 wrote:When 9/11/01 happened everyone got behind the President.
When 9/11/12 happened the GOP tried to use it for political gain.


A photo of the President doing his job isn't the same as attacking the President even though you don't have all of the facts.CitadelGrad wrote:Yeah, because Obama's photo op in the Situation Room wasn't political at all.BlueHen86 wrote:When 9/11/01 happened everyone got behind the President.
When 9/11/12 happened the GOP tried to use it for political gain.


Not really.CID1990 wrote:The same people who criticized Bush for continuing to read a children's book as the 9-11 attacks occurred... they don't see the irony here at all.
It speaks volumes.

Come on, that's almost a talking point right there, and talking points tend to skip certain details. I could also say, with just as much veracity:BlueHen86 wrote:When 9/11/01 happened everyone got behind the President.
When 9/11/12 happened the GOP tried to use it for political gain.

Almost doesn't count. On the one hand you have the country rallying behind the President. On the other hand you have the GOP rallying behind their guy. In both cases we were attacked by Muslims. The big differences being the death toll and our reaction to the attacks.GannonFan wrote:Come on, that's almost a talking point right there, and talking points tend to skip certain details. I could also say, with just as much veracity:BlueHen86 wrote:When 9/11/01 happened everyone got behind the President.
When 9/11/12 happened the GOP tried to use it for political gain.
When 9/11/01 happened, the President said we were attacked and were at war.
When 9/11/12 happened, the President tried to ignore that it was 9/11 and also talked about a crappy YouTube movie trailer.
There's plenty of poor behavior from both parties with the killing of the US ambassador. Not a shining moment for anyone involved.

So, you are comparing a few kooks with a major news network that won't let a questionable story go.CID1990 wrote:The same people who criticized Bush for continuing to read a children's book as the 9-11 attacks occurred... they don't see the irony here at all.
It speaks volumes.

If Obama had hauled his ass into the situation room as soon as Benghazi happened, we might not have four dead Americans, including a U.S. ambassador.BlueHen86 wrote:A photo of the President doing his job isn't the same as attacking the President even though you don't have all of the facts.CitadelGrad wrote:
Yeah, because Obama's photo op in the Situation Room wasn't political at all.
It's one thing to try and reassure people that you are at work, it's another to use American deaths to further an agenda. Romney jumped all over Benghazi as soon as it happened.


CitadelGrad wrote: Yeah, because Obama's photo op in the Situation Room wasn't political at all.
Was Obama in the Situation Room or not? Make up your mind.CitadelGrad wrote: If Obama had hauled his ass into the situation room as soon as Benghazi happened, we might not have four dead Americans, including a U.S. ambassador.

If a frog had wings he wouldn't whomp his ass hopping.CitadelGrad wrote:If Obama had hauled his ass into the situation room as soon as Benghazi happened, we might not have four dead Americans, including a U.S. ambassador.BlueHen86 wrote:
A photo of the President doing his job isn't the same as attacking the President even though you don't have all of the facts.
It's one thing to try and reassure people that you are at work, it's another to use American deaths to further an agenda. Romney jumped all over Benghazi as soon as it happened.

If Bush had stopped reading "My Pet Goat"...houndawg wrote:If a frog had wings he wouldn't whomp his ass hopping.CitadelGrad wrote:
If Obama had hauled his ass into the situation room as soon as Benghazi happened, we might not have four dead Americans, including a U.S. ambassador.

Seems odd that an indirect fire weapon like a mortar would be deployed in such a way that it was in line-of-sight of its intended target, which it must have been if it was being painted with a laser. Could have been a trap to get some of our aircraft into Stinger range using the mortar as bait.AZGrizFan wrote:You forgot "were painting the mortar base with a laser for hours and couldn't get a laser guided bomb dropped to save their life". Literally.andy7171 wrote: Hmm. Two former SEALs disobeyed orders, recovered 3 of 4 wounded/dead Americans HOURS after initial the attqack. Repeatedly asked for cover fire. Died defending the compound. When help was within half the time of onset to end.
![]()
Just because he's black doesn't mean he is without fail.
Wecould have saved at least two lives laying down fire from above.
Cmplete fail MrK! ****!

You fucking idiot. He was in the situation room for his Sandy photo op. He was not in the situation room during the Benghazi attack. If he was in the situation room then and had full knowledge of what was happening, he should be impeached and face a criminal trial.BlueHen86 wrote:CitadelGrad wrote: Yeah, because Obama's photo op in the Situation Room wasn't political at all.Was Obama in the Situation Room or not? Make up your mind.CitadelGrad wrote: If Obama had hauled his ass into the situation room as soon as Benghazi happened, we might not have four dead Americans, including a U.S. ambassador.


Not that odd at all. Many muj who use mortars in Iraq and Afghanistan don't understand how to use mortars as indirect fire weapons. They have to eyeball the target and make adjustments based on their observations.houndawg wrote:Seems odd that an indirect fire weapon like a mortar would be deployed in such a way that it was in line-of-sight of its intended target, which it must have been if it was being painted with a laser. Could have been a trap to get some of our aircraft into Stinger range using the mortar as bait.AZGrizFan wrote:
You forgot "were painting the mortar base with a laser for hours and couldn't get a laser guided bomb dropped to save their life". Literally.
