From what I hear, it is about 50-50, which as recently as last week it was about 85-15 favor of the Kings staying in Sacramento. The Seattle group has made it clear to anyone in the league that they are looking to move a team to Seattle, contingent on that team's owners selling to a local Seattle group. The Maloofs, until very recently, had expressed no desire in selling the Kings, not even to any local Sacramento group. As the city has found out, dealing with the Maloofs can be extremely risky which is why I'm not saying it is a done deal (I will say it looks very close).
I also have heard that the move would have to be approved by the NBA relocation committee, which is chaired by Clay Bennett. It would be funny if he vetoes the deal and keeps the Kings from moving to Seattle, especially after Bennett took the Sonics to Oklahoma City. However, all indications are, if the deal is presented to them, they would not keep the Kings from going to Seattle.
The big question I have is why? After having a new owner purchase the Sonics and then taking them away from Seattle, they are doing the exact same thing to Sacramento. I'm sure there will be a small group of Sonics fans at the Rose Garden in Portland this Sunday, wearing their old Sonic jerseys and trying to divert attention to them (basically saying how they were "wronged" by Stern and the NBA). I know this because they do this every time the Thunder come to Portland. They do not even cheer FOR the Blazers, they just cheer against the Thunder, Stern, Bennett and the rest of the NBA. We never wanted to be a part of this, as the Thunder are in the same division and we have to beat them for a shot at the playoffs every year. Now they want the Sacramento fans to feel how they felt. Pretty two-faced, if you ask me.
