Start Tebow for one game and see if he's as bad as you think he is, simple as that. Heck, do it when the team was eliminated from playoff contention. Therefore, you can say you tried something different and it didn't work and move on. It really isn't that difficult.Sure there is, they had nobody else who was better. If they did Sanchez would have been benched; it is as simple as that.
Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage

- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
Apparently for you it is. You don't think the coaches see him in practice every day? They knew he couldn't do the job. The idea that they held him back becasue he was a celebrity is just silly. They would gladly put up with the distraction if the guy could win.Seahawks08 wrote:Start Tebow for one game and see if he's as bad as you think he is, simple as that. Heck, do it when the team was eliminated from playoff contention. Therefore, you can say you tried something different and it didn't work and move on. It really isn't that difficult.Sure there is, they had nobody else who was better. If they did Sanchez would have been benched; it is as simple as that.
- tampajag
- Supporter

- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:09 am
- I am a fan of: whooties
- A.K.A.: hamburger pimp
- Location: clearwater, fl bwo tampa bwo baton rouge
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
BlueHen86 wrote:It's part of God's plan.
God loves Tim Tebow and doesn't want to see him get hurt, so He's keeping someplace where he won't play.
God also loves football, so He is keeping Tebow someplace where he won't play.

- tampajag
- Supporter

- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:09 am
- I am a fan of: whooties
- A.K.A.: hamburger pimp
- Location: clearwater, fl bwo tampa bwo baton rouge
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
I think he's speaking about Jeff Blake in 03Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Please don't insult the game of football by comparing Tebow to Kurt Warner.SuperHornet wrote:It could be just spin, ASU, but the way Hacksaw phrased it, it sure didn't sound like there was any intent to guage Tebow's viability on the trade market with the intent of either dealing him or cutting him if a deal hasn't emerged past a certain point. It truly sounded like an adamant refusal to even consider either. Again, it COULD just be spin to keep everyone guessing.
Prior to Hacksaw's report, the rumor mill had Tebow going to AZ. We all know what happened the last time a supposedly "washed up" QB went to the Cards....![]()
![]()

- tampajag
- Supporter

- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:09 am
- I am a fan of: whooties
- A.K.A.: hamburger pimp
- Location: clearwater, fl bwo tampa bwo baton rouge
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
Tupa was a hell of a punter like the great Danny Whitedbackjon wrote:And just because a QB had a good game or two means squat. Having been a Cardinals Fan for decades, and having seen the revolving door at QB, I can attest to great games by John Skelton, Tom Tupa, Matt Leinart, etc - none who are good QBs

-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
I bet the Denver coaches felt the same way.Apparently for you it is. You don't think the coaches see him in practice every day? They knew he couldn't do the job. The idea that they held him back becasue he was a celebrity is just silly. They would gladly put up with the distraction if the guy could win.

- ASUMountaineer
- Level4

- Posts: 5047
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian State
- Location: The Old North State
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
First, Rex is still the HC. Try again.Seahawks08 wrote:First, Rex's job was also put on the line when starting Sanchez, who is one of the worst QBs in the league. He also put his job on the line when starting Mcillroy over Tebow, and how did that work out? Sounds like he should have been fired since both Sanchez and Mcillroy sucked.Like an NFL coach is willing to put his job on the line over some sort of principled stand against Tebow. Yeah, Tebow did so well for Denver they couldn't wait to ship him off. As of now, it doesn't appear any team wants Tebow to even be a backup QB. Are you really saying that all 32 teams have a vendetta against Tim Tebow?
Second, if you can get Peyton Manning, then yes, of course you are going to ship Tebow off.![]()
And finally, I think teams would take Tebow as a backup, but the problem is he is a celebrity. Therefore, they don't want the distraction.
Second, they were willing to ship him off before getting Peyton. Try again.
Finally, you will find any excuse that does not include his ability to play QB. Look, I like Tebow and I would like to see him succeed as a starter in the NFL. Unfortunately, the people in the NFL that have more football knowledge than both of us combined, disagree with your statement.
Appalachian State Mountaineers:
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
- ASUMountaineer
- Level4

- Posts: 5047
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian State
- Location: The Old North State
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
If they think he gives the team a better chance to win, then it does give him the right. This isn't complicated to understand, and your vendetta argument just doesn't hold water.Seahawks08 wrote:Good for him.Sanchez has more playoff victories than Tebow.![]()
Doesn't give him the right to keep starting after sucking it up beyond belief last season.
Appalachian State Mountaineers:
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
- ASUMountaineer
- Level4

- Posts: 5047
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian State
- Location: The Old North State
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
Well then, that settles it. Tebow > Manning. Excellent point, JSO.JohnStOnge wrote:Denver won more playoff games with Tebow and quarterback than they did with Manning at quarterback.
Appalachian State Mountaineers:
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
- ASUMountaineer
- Level4

- Posts: 5047
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian State
- Location: The Old North State
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
Of course there is a valid argument against it--the Jets' backup QB's. That's easily a valid argument.Seahawks08 wrote:Of course they are part of the equation. That's why he will remain the QB of the jets this year. Last year, he was frankly one of the worst QBs in the league. I'm sorry but winning a couple playoff games only gets you so far. He should have been benched and there's no valid argument against it.Nobody has a 'right' to start in the NFL, it has to be earned. If you are going to use playoff perfomance from previous seasons (which you did) then the wins by Sanchez have to be part of the equation.
Appalachian State Mountaineers:
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
- ASUMountaineer
- Level4

- Posts: 5047
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian State
- Location: The Old North State
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
As BlueHen86 said, don't they see Tebow in practice everyday? They, better than anyone, know what he can do. They don't need to trot him into a game to satisfy a Seahawks/Tebow fan.Seahawks08 wrote:Start Tebow for one game and see if he's as bad as you think he is, simple as that. Heck, do it when the team was eliminated from playoff contention. Therefore, you can say you tried something different and it didn't work and move on. It really isn't that difficult.Sure there is, they had nobody else who was better. If they did Sanchez would have been benched; it is as simple as that.
Appalachian State Mountaineers:
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
OMFG, just give the guy a chance. One game! Again, after they were eliminated from the playoffs, there was ZERO reason to keep starting Sanchez if your argument is that he gave them the best chance to win. If anything, they would get a better draft pick with Tebow starting since they were most likely going to lose in your opinion. Plus, they could show their fans how bad he was.If they think he gives the team a better chance to win, then it does give him the right. This isn't complicated to understand, and your vendetta argument just doesn't hold water.
But I'm done with this now, you know my position and I know yours and there's no way of validating either one.

- ASUMountaineer
- Level4

- Posts: 5047
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian State
- Location: The Old North State
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
Do you always take your ball and run home?Seahawks08 wrote:OMFG, just give the guy a chance. One game! Again, after they were eliminated from the playoffs, there was ZERO reason to keep starting Sanchez if your argument is that he gave them the best chance to win. If anything, they would get a better draft pick with Tebow starting since they were most likely going to lose in your opinion. Plus, they could show their fans how bad he was.If they think he gives the team a better chance to win, then it does give him the right. This isn't complicated to understand, and your vendetta argument just doesn't hold water.
But I'm done with this now, you know my position and I know yours and there's no way of validating either one.
C'mon man. This is the NFL, not little league. Tebow had his chance--in practice. You only get to start if you've earned the right to start. It's the same with players on every team. They have to earn the chance to start. Being famous for being virtuous isn't the same as being the best player in your position on the team. The Jets/Rex Ryan don't have a personal vendetta against Tebow. Rex Ryan's job is to try to win every game. His job is not to play Tebow so that he gets a "chance" or to prove "how bad he was" to fans.
Appalachian State Mountaineers:
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
What about all the other guys on the team that don't start? Why should Tebow get special consideration? If the coaches don't think he can do better than the starter then he should not start.Seahawks08 wrote:OMFG, just give the guy a chance. One game! Again, after they were eliminated from the playoffs, there was ZERO reason to keep starting Sanchez if your argument is that he gave them the best chance to win. If anything, they would get a better draft pick with Tebow starting since they were most likely going to lose in your opinion. Plus, they could show their fans how bad he was.If they think he gives the team a better chance to win, then it does give him the right. This isn't complicated to understand, and your vendetta argument just doesn't hold water.
But I'm done with this now, you know my position and I know yours and there's no way of validating either one.
A coaches job is to put his team in the best position to win a game, not start a guy just because he has a cult following.
-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
Maybe you didn't understand it the first time. I'll write it differently. You aren't going to convince me that Tebow should not have started. I watched most of the Jets games this year and listened to what was going on behind the scenes. So, it's time to move on.Do you always take your ball and run home?


- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet

- Posts: 20856
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
Wrong.ASUMountaineer wrote:C'mon man. This is the NFL, not little league. Tebow had his chance--in practice. You only get to start if you've earned the right to start.
If that were the case, Kaepernick would have never started a game this year (other than the period when Smith was injured) because he didn't win the job in training camp.

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
He's not wrong. Even though Smith was the starter, the SF coaches knew that Kaepernick could do the job. Smith's injury gave him the chance to prove it.SuperHornet wrote:Wrong.ASUMountaineer wrote:C'mon man. This is the NFL, not little league. Tebow had his chance--in practice. You only get to start if you've earned the right to start.
If that were the case, Kaepernick would have never started a game this year (other than the period when Smith was injured) because he didn't win the job in training camp.
I'd like to see Tebow succeed, but I don't think there is a conspiracy to keep him down. If the Jets coaches aren't playing him I think it is because they don't think he can play. They don't need a live game to show them what they already see in practice. Maybe the Jets system isn't the best one for him, in that case I hope he gets an opportunity somewhere else.
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet

- Posts: 20856
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
86, that's the most rational argument I've seen on this thread, including mine.
The plain fact of the matter is that most of his fans were initially attracted by the fact that he's a Christian (me included, as I am NOT a fan of Florida), and most of his detractors are repelled by that fact. Both sides try to gloss their arguments in terms of game play. The detractors will deny that, but MOST of them are lying. The detractors who are lying are the ones who want him gone NOW. Tebow fanatics want him to start NOW regardless of who's there. There ARE rational people on both sides, though. The rational fans merely want open competition, believing that Tebow can win the starting job on most teams in open training camp competition. The rational detractors want the same because they believe that will prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that Tebow is not NFL material. Open competition is the only way to really prove that, either way.
I believe that Tebow could be the starter on MOST teams, but not all. I'm not crazy enough to believe he could beat out P. Manning, Brady, etc. But he could probably win the starting job in half to 3/4 or more of existing NFL cities, particularly Dallas, Arizona, Buffalo, and Miami. Of course, that's strictly my opinion.
The plain fact of the matter is that most of his fans were initially attracted by the fact that he's a Christian (me included, as I am NOT a fan of Florida), and most of his detractors are repelled by that fact. Both sides try to gloss their arguments in terms of game play. The detractors will deny that, but MOST of them are lying. The detractors who are lying are the ones who want him gone NOW. Tebow fanatics want him to start NOW regardless of who's there. There ARE rational people on both sides, though. The rational fans merely want open competition, believing that Tebow can win the starting job on most teams in open training camp competition. The rational detractors want the same because they believe that will prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that Tebow is not NFL material. Open competition is the only way to really prove that, either way.
I believe that Tebow could be the starter on MOST teams, but not all. I'm not crazy enough to believe he could beat out P. Manning, Brady, etc. But he could probably win the starting job in half to 3/4 or more of existing NFL cities, particularly Dallas, Arizona, Buffalo, and Miami. Of course, that's strictly my opinion.

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
The only team tebow could win the job for, right now, is Arizona and that's it.
The broncos dumped him before they had manning
Sent from the nexus of the universe
The broncos dumped him before they had manning
Sent from the nexus of the universe
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
But he won more playoff games than Manning. Surely that means he's better.clenz wrote:The only team tebow could win the job for, right now, is Arizona and that's it.
The broncos dumped him before they had manning
Sent from the nexus of the universe
-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
Alright, settle down there. Let's not go overboard on this. Clenz is right that Arizona would be the only place where Tebow could win the starting gig outright. But even then, he would be on a short leash. I would say he would give Sanchez on the Jets some major competition, but he's not going to get that chance. The Jags would be smart to bring him in as a stopgap so they could improve other areas in the draft, but they don't want him. Sadly, it looks like he may have to switch to fullback at this point if he wants to play.I believe that Tebow could be the starter on MOST teams, but not all. I'm not crazy enough to believe he could beat out P. Manning, Brady, etc. But he could probably win the starting job in half to 3/4 or more of existing NFL cities, particularly Dallas, Arizona, Buffalo, and Miami. Of course, that's strictly my opinion.

- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
If he were smart he'd say fuck it to football and switch to porn. He'd make a killing.Seahawks08 wrote:Alright, settle down there. Let's not go overboard on this. Clenz is right that Arizona would be the only place where Tebow could win the starting gig outright. But even then, he would be on a short leash. I would say he would give Sanchez on the Jets some major competition, but he's not going to get that chance. The Jags would be smart to bring him in as a stopgap so they could improve other areas in the draft, but they don't want him. Sadly, it looks like he may have to switch to fullback at this point if he wants to play.I believe that Tebow could be the starter on MOST teams, but not all. I'm not crazy enough to believe he could beat out P. Manning, Brady, etc. But he could probably win the starting job in half to 3/4 or more of existing NFL cities, particularly Dallas, Arizona, Buffalo, and Miami. Of course, that's strictly my opinion.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
Tebow would be the 3rd best QB on the AZ roster right now.dbackjon wrote:No, Tebow couldn't win the Arizona job
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

- UNI88
- Supporter

- Posts: 30275
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico
Re: Jets Holding Tebow Hostage
Some minor changes to the act of Tebowing and he'd be a Skinimax sensation.Grizalltheway wrote:If he were smart he'd say **** it to football and switch to porn. He'd make a killing.Seahawks08 wrote:
Alright, settle down there. Let's not go overboard on this. Clenz is right that Arizona would be the only place where Tebow could win the starting gig outright. But even then, he would be on a short leash. I would say he would give Sanchez on the Jets some major competition, but he's not going to get that chance. The Jags would be smart to bring him in as a stopgap so they could improve other areas in the draft, but they don't want him. Sadly, it looks like he may have to switch to fullback at this point if he wants to play.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
