Analyzing the WAC

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Analyzing the WAC

Post by AZGrizFan »

EWURanger wrote:
kemajic wrote: Some, but not all. BSU and Idaho were still in the league in '95 when Montana won the NC. They beat BSU that year 54-28. Montana has beaten Idaho the last four times they played and 8 of the last 10.
That's why I said "a lot of it" as opposed to "all of it". I know about Montana's record against Idaho in recent history. Eastern has also beaten post move-up BSU and Idaho (on more than one occasion) as well.

My point in all this is if we can all agree that the Big Sky was a more competitive conference top to bottom back when BSU. Nevada, and Idaho were still playing in it - then surely even Montana fans must admit that it would have been much harder for the aforementioned schools to replicate what Montana did in terms of winning streaks, conference championships, and play-off runs while the old BSC was still intact.

Again, I'm not taking anything away from UM, but their rise to dominance in the BSC was at least partially facilitated by the departure of Nevada and the Idaho schools.
Actually, you've got it ass-backwards. BSU and Idaho AD's saw the writing on the wall with Papa Bear and '95 just sealed the deal. They KNEW Montana was going to dominate for YEARS and if they wanted to ever win anything again they had to get out of the same conference as Montana, so they bolted to the Big West Conference. :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
CatMom
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4289
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
A.K.A.: CatMILF
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: Analyzing the WAC

Post by CatMom »

I don't think it is really worth all this pissing. The BSC may be a better conference but it is still FCS and will always be perceived as such. Kind of how the BSC and CAA look down, now, on the SLC or Pioneer League...think about it.
The WAC may be the bottom of the barrel in the FBS pecking order but it's still FBS and people know about it.

As I have stated before, I'm not happy about the (so called) move up but I have no say in it, never did. I don't like it but it's where TXST is going and I have to live with it.
Last edited by CatMom on Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45613
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Analyzing the WAC

Post by dbackjon »

AZGrizFan wrote:
EWURanger wrote:
That's why I said "a lot of it" as opposed to "all of it". I know about Montana's record against Idaho in recent history. Eastern has also beaten post move-up BSU and Idaho (on more than one occasion) as well.

My point in all this is if we can all agree that the Big Sky was a more competitive conference top to bottom back when BSU. Nevada, and Idaho were still playing in it - then surely even Montana fans must admit that it would have been much harder for the aforementioned schools to replicate what Montana did in terms of winning streaks, conference championships, and play-off runs while the old BSC was still intact.

Again, I'm not taking anything away from UM, but their rise to dominance in the BSC was at least partially facilitated by the departure of Nevada and the Idaho schools.
Actually, you've got it ass-backwards. BSU and Idaho AD's saw the writing on the wall with Papa Bear and '95 just sealed the deal. They KNEW Montana was going to dominate for YEARS and if they wanted to ever win anything again they had to get out of the same conference as Montana, so they bolted to the Big West Conference. :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
:thumb:
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 62357
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Analyzing the WAC

Post by kalm »

AZGrizFan wrote:
EWURanger wrote:
That's why I said "a lot of it" as opposed to "all of it". I know about Montana's record against Idaho in recent history. Eastern has also beaten post move-up BSU and Idaho (on more than one occasion) as well.

My point in all this is if we can all agree that the Big Sky was a more competitive conference top to bottom back when BSU. Nevada, and Idaho were still playing in it - then surely even Montana fans must admit that it would have been much harder for the aforementioned schools to replicate what Montana did in terms of winning streaks, conference championships, and play-off runs while the old BSC was still intact.

Again, I'm not taking anything away from UM, but their rise to dominance in the BSC was at least partially facilitated by the departure of Nevada and the Idaho schools.
Actually, you've got it ass-backwards. BSU and Idaho AD's saw the writing on the wall with Papa Bear and '95 just sealed the deal. They KNEW Montana was going to dominate for YEARS and if they wanted to ever win anything again they had to get out of the same conference as Montana, so they bolted to the Big West Conference. :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod:
Eastern's title this year will have Montana fleeing to the WAC for the same reason. (Doing my best BF). :coffee:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
mlbowl
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 2839
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:31 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
Location: Malmstrom AFB, MT

Re: Analyzing the WAC

Post by mlbowl »

kalm wrote: (Doing my best BF). :coffee:


:lol: :lol: :lol:
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. - Coach Finstock
Post Reply