Actually, you've got it ass-backwards. BSU and Idaho AD's saw the writing on the wall with Papa Bear and '95 just sealed the deal. They KNEW Montana was going to dominate for YEARS and if they wanted to ever win anything again they had to get out of the same conference as Montana, so they bolted to the Big West Conference.EWURanger wrote:That's why I said "a lot of it" as opposed to "all of it". I know about Montana's record against Idaho in recent history. Eastern has also beaten post move-up BSU and Idaho (on more than one occasion) as well.kemajic wrote: Some, but not all. BSU and Idaho were still in the league in '95 when Montana won the NC. They beat BSU that year 54-28. Montana has beaten Idaho the last four times they played and 8 of the last 10.
My point in all this is if we can all agree that the Big Sky was a more competitive conference top to bottom back when BSU. Nevada, and Idaho were still playing in it - then surely even Montana fans must admit that it would have been much harder for the aforementioned schools to replicate what Montana did in terms of winning streaks, conference championships, and play-off runs while the old BSC was still intact.
Again, I'm not taking anything away from UM, but their rise to dominance in the BSC was at least partially facilitated by the departure of Nevada and the Idaho schools.
Analyzing the WAC
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Analyzing the WAC
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- CatMom
- Level3
- Posts: 4289
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
- A.K.A.: CatMILF
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: Analyzing the WAC
I don't think it is really worth all this pissing. The BSC may be a better conference but it is still FCS and will always be perceived as such. Kind of how the BSC and CAA look down, now, on the SLC or Pioneer League...think about it.
The WAC may be the bottom of the barrel in the FBS pecking order but it's still FBS and people know about it.
As I have stated before, I'm not happy about the (so called) move up but I have no say in it, never did. I don't like it but it's where TXST is going and I have to live with it.
The WAC may be the bottom of the barrel in the FBS pecking order but it's still FBS and people know about it.
As I have stated before, I'm not happy about the (so called) move up but I have no say in it, never did. I don't like it but it's where TXST is going and I have to live with it.
Last edited by CatMom on Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45613
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Analyzing the WAC
AZGrizFan wrote:Actually, you've got it ass-backwards. BSU and Idaho AD's saw the writing on the wall with Papa Bear and '95 just sealed the deal. They KNEW Montana was going to dominate for YEARS and if they wanted to ever win anything again they had to get out of the same conference as Montana, so they bolted to the Big West Conference.EWURanger wrote:
That's why I said "a lot of it" as opposed to "all of it". I know about Montana's record against Idaho in recent history. Eastern has also beaten post move-up BSU and Idaho (on more than one occasion) as well.
My point in all this is if we can all agree that the Big Sky was a more competitive conference top to bottom back when BSU. Nevada, and Idaho were still playing in it - then surely even Montana fans must admit that it would have been much harder for the aforementioned schools to replicate what Montana did in terms of winning streaks, conference championships, and play-off runs while the old BSC was still intact.
Again, I'm not taking anything away from UM, but their rise to dominance in the BSC was at least partially facilitated by the departure of Nevada and the Idaho schools.
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 62357
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Analyzing the WAC
Eastern's title this year will have Montana fleeing to the WAC for the same reason. (Doing my best BF).AZGrizFan wrote:Actually, you've got it ass-backwards. BSU and Idaho AD's saw the writing on the wall with Papa Bear and '95 just sealed the deal. They KNEW Montana was going to dominate for YEARS and if they wanted to ever win anything again they had to get out of the same conference as Montana, so they bolted to the Big West Conference.EWURanger wrote:
That's why I said "a lot of it" as opposed to "all of it". I know about Montana's record against Idaho in recent history. Eastern has also beaten post move-up BSU and Idaho (on more than one occasion) as well.
My point in all this is if we can all agree that the Big Sky was a more competitive conference top to bottom back when BSU. Nevada, and Idaho were still playing in it - then surely even Montana fans must admit that it would have been much harder for the aforementioned schools to replicate what Montana did in terms of winning streaks, conference championships, and play-off runs while the old BSC was still intact.
Again, I'm not taking anything away from UM, but their rise to dominance in the BSC was at least partially facilitated by the departure of Nevada and the Idaho schools.
- mlbowl
- Supporter
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:31 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- Location: Malmstrom AFB, MT
Re: Analyzing the WAC
kalm wrote: (Doing my best BF).
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. - Coach Finstock