2020 General Election

[UNI88]

Do you have links to posts where you've admitted to being wrong?

Of course he doesn't. He's full of shit.

He'll probably find one where he posted something with a numerical error and then corrected it as proof that he can admit he's wrong.

[kalm]

stupid double posts

Spoiler: show

I’m sorry. Just wanted to join in the fun

[Ibanez]

Checking to see if BDK responded. I don’t want him/he/they to think I’m ignoring his posts. He may give you 36 hrs to respond but that’s not good enough for me!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

MCBOS refuses to turn over subpoenaed equipment and passwords? What are they hiding?

[kalm]

MCBOS refuses to turn over subpoenaed equipment and passwords? What are they hiding?

The truth! Duh!

[SeattleGriz]

MCBOS refuses to turn over subpoenaed equipment and passwords? What are they hiding?

The truth! Duh!

Exactly. You know this board is hardened against talking points when I throw a basic shitty one out there and only get a smartass comment in reply!

How about Trump would whoop your ass in a game of golf? That get yer goat? Huh!?

[BDKJMU]

Prove it. Years of posts suggest otherwise. Or will you just deflect? Avoid the question?

Not surprisingly, you missed the joke bub.

And you're still wrong, Eichmann was Gestapo. I've shown you the evidence, it's up to you have the intellectual honesty and maturity to admit you were wrong. I'll be here waiting.

Spoiler: show

You've got it backwards: Gestapo was a subdivision of the SS after Himmler took over.

I didn’t say Eichman wasn’t Gestapo in my above post by saying WHETHER OR NOT. Whether or not = irrelevant to what we’re talking about. Few weeks ago I was wrong on saying he wasn’t (after Cid said the same). You corrected us. Again, WHETHER OR NOT Eichman’s SS dept was considered part of the Gestapo (it was as you pointed out) is irrelvant to someone ignoring 2 of the 3 biggest outbreaks of the last 60 years.

How many seeds?

Well fuck me. Before 2018, no conference had ever gotten more than 2.
I was assuming: 2 MVFC, 2 CAA, 2 Big Sky, JSU, and 1 So-Con or Southland. I was wrong on a 2nd CAA and JSU, with 3rd and 4th Big Sky instead…

That's a heavy price to pay.

…BTW I was wrong on Nova when I said semis in 09' and 2-9 in 10'. It was semis in 10' and 2-9 in 11'.

Actually I was wrong by 1, and was wrong about the that limit applying to I-AA….

But I've been wrong before...

..I was wrong- it sold out.

I was wrong.

And there’s countless where I said ‘I could be wrong.’

[BDKJMU]

Do you have links to posts where you've admitted to being wrong?

See above

[BDKJMU]

Of course he doesn't. He's full of shit.

Wrong

[UNI88]

Do you have links to posts where you've admitted to being wrong?

See above

Are any of those from the Poly board? If not, they are ruled irrelevant and will not be admitted into evidence. If they are, context is required before a ruling can be made.

[Ibanez]

Prove it. Years of posts suggest otherwise. Or will you just deflect? Avoid the question?

I didn’t say Eichman wasn’t Gestapo in my above post by saying WHETHER OR NOT. Whether or not = irrelevant to what we’re talking about. Few weeks ago I was wrong on saying he wasn’t (after Cid said the same). You corrected us. Again, WHETHER OR NOT Eichman’s SS dept was considered part of the Gestapo (it was as you pointed out) is irrelvant to someone ignoring 2 of the 3 biggest outbreaks of the last 60 years.

Well fuck me. Before 2018, no conference had ever gotten more than 2.
I was assuming: 2 MVFC, 2 CAA, 2 Big Sky, JSU, and 1 So-Con or Southland. I was wrong on a 2nd CAA and JSU, with 3rd and 4th Big Sky instead…

…BTW I was wrong on Nova when I said semis in 09' and 2-9 in 10'. It was semis in 10' and 2-9 in 11'.

Actually I was wrong by 1, and was wrong about the that limit applying to I-AA….

But I've been wrong before...

..I was wrong- it sold out.

I was wrong.

And there’s countless where I said ‘I could be wrong.’

Saying " I could be wrong" isn't the same as admitting you are wrong. And we're talking politics, not history or football.

[Ibanez]

Do you have links to posts where you've admitted to being wrong?

See above

My post is based off of open secrets and forbes article. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2020/0 ... lionaires/ Last updated this year based off their filings. I see I misread the paragraph around Pelosi. My mistake.

But you make a great distinction and probably the most important one - did they become rich while serving the country. You cannot fault someone from their business acumen or being born into a wealthy family and inheriting money.


I think my point, which you all are missing, is that the fat cats are both Rs and Ds.

My mistake...for some reason the google result I clicked on was for 2018 - https://www.govtrack.us/congress/member ... /ideology/

She was #4 in 2018, #7 in 2017. Seems all subjective. If nominating Aretha Franklin for an award is basis for being uber liberal, then we have real problems.

Spoiler: show

When we look back, Tiny Dick Frail Ego Trump will be consistently ranked near Buchannan and his idol Nixon.

[/quote]

Here are a couple, " i could be wrong"

Refusing to answer a question is ok. You can politely refuse and I would think the pollsters will/can account for that in their statistic. I could be wrong.

If you're stopping to talk to a pollster, KNOWING they're going to ask you questions about your vote, can't we make an assumption that you would be truthful? Otherwise you'd ignore them or politely decline. Otherwise, who is going to stop and talk to a pollster and avoid the questions and/or lie?

I had to read that a couple times to make sure I understood what you were saying. I'm not sure I do. If polling is inaccurate because people lie, or because many people will not divulge, or they're at an election spot that is heavily tilted in one direction.... all valid reasons to "get down on polling altogether" IMO.

But I have no doubt more advanced degrees holders vote Dem. That shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.

The polling isn't to blame for Joe Blow lying to them and therefore being less accurate. That's what I'm saying. I haven't looked into it so I could be wildly mistaken. And if I am wrong, i'll gladly accept it. I agree that polling hasn't be the greatest is predicting the past 2 Presidential Elections. I wonder how much of that has to with the Trump as a candidate vs the methodology. I assume it's a combo of both.

Exit Polling isn't intended to say who is winning on election night (although it is used for that). Exit polling's real use is for the post election analysis of why a candidate won/loss. What demographics, income ranges, genders, locations, etc... did or didn't support a candidate.


To your last comment - well, obviously.

Anyway - time to end this ridiculous back and forth. I'll man up.

BDK, buddy, my Southern Brethren - I was wrong in saying you never admit a mistake.

[BDKJMU]

See above

Are any of those from the Poly board? If not, they are ruled irrelevant and will not be admitted into evidence. If they are, context is required before a ruling can be made.

The 1st one is from the poly board.
And you said:

Do you have links to posts where you've admitted to being wrong?

You didn’t say ‘Do you have links to posts FROM THE POLY BOARD where you've admitted to being wrong?’

I provide numerous links, and then you

by adding the poly board caveat. Well,

for trying tk change the rules in the middle of the game.

[UNI88]

Are any of those from the Poly board? If not, they are ruled irrelevant and will not be admitted into evidence. If they are, context is required before a ruling can be made.

The 1st one is from the poly board.
And you said:

Do you have links to posts where you've admitted to being wrong?

You didn’t say ‘Do you have links to posts FROM THE POLY BOARD where you've admitted to being wrong?’

I provide numerous links, and then you

by adding the poly board caveat. Well,

for trying tk change the rules in the middle of the game.

Waaaaa! Do you need a safe space with a teddy bear and your binky?

We're on the Poly board, it was inferred.

[Ibanez]

In his most recent “prophetic insight,” Jansen claimed that Trump was “sworn in” on March 4th to become the “19th president,” pointing to a popular QAnon conspiracy theory.

Although entirely false, the QAnon prophecy predicts that Trump was inaugurated on March 4 to become the first true president since Ulysses S. Grant, as prior to the 20th amendment of the United States Constitution, adopted in 1933, the president and members of Congress took office on March 4.

Jansen later tried to explain why his previous prophecies have not come to fruition, saying, “You need to understand that when the word of the Lord comes to a prophet, the prophet speaks the word of the Lord. Things can shift.”

“Not the goalpost,” he added. “I’m not shifting the goalpost.”

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/pro-trum ... -in-march/

Can't believe there are people that believe in this garbage.

And the 19th President?

[AZGrizFan]

In his most recent “prophetic insight,” Jansen claimed that Trump was “sworn in” on March 4th to become the “19th president,” pointing to a popular QAnon conspiracy theory.

Although entirely false, the QAnon prophecy predicts that Trump was inaugurated on March 4 to become the first true president since Ulysses S. Grant, as prior to the 20th amendment of the United States Constitution, adopted in 1933, the president and members of Congress took office on March 4.

Jansen later tried to explain why his previous prophecies have not come to fruition, saying, “You need to understand that when the word of the Lord comes to a prophet, the prophet speaks the word of the Lord. Things can shift.”

“Not the goalpost,” he added. “I’m not shifting the goalpost.”

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/pro-trum ... -in-march/

Can't believe there are people that believe in this garbage.

And the 19th President?

rapidly heading into Jim Jones territory....

[Ibanez]

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/pro-trum ... -in-march/

Can't believe there are people that believe in this garbage.

And the 19th President?

rapidly heading into Jim Jones territory....

Aren't they, though? The "Q" crowd and their followers are mind-numbingly stupid.

[SeattleGriz]

Great 2018 report from this commission. You know what they came up with? All the shit that was mentioned in the 2020 election. I wonder what changed. Either Trump nipped it in the bud, or the Dems were politicizing.

https://homeland.house.gov/news/press-r ... task-force

[Skjellyfetti]

2 more Oath Keepers added to 18 person conspiracy case. One of them was in a leadership only group chat.

Overt Acts, Planning for January 6, 2021, Paragraph 39. At a GoToMeeting held on November 9, 2020, PERSON ONE told those attending the meeting, “We're going to defend the president, the duly elected president, and we call on him to do what needs to be done to save our country. Because if you don’t guys, you're going to be in a bloody, bloody civil war, and a bloody—you can call it an insurrection or you can call it a war or fight.” PERSON ONE called upon his followers to go to Washington, D.C., to let the President know “that the people are behind him.” PERSON ONE told his followers they needed to be prepared to fight Antifa, which he characterized as a group of individuals with whom if the fight comes, let the fight come. Let Antifa -if they go kinetic on us, then we'll go kinetic back on them. I'm willing to sacrifice myself for that. Let the fight start there. That will give President Trump what he needs, frankly. If things go Kinetic, good. If they throw bombs at us and shoot us, great, because that brings the president his reason and rationale for dropping the Insurrection Act. PERSON ONE continued, I do want some Oath Keepers to stay on the outside, and to stay fully armed and prepared to go in armed, if they have to... So our posture’s gonna be that we're posted outside of DC, um, awaiting the President's orders. . . . We hope he will give us the orders. We want him to declare an insurrection, and to call us up as the militia.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/press-r ... 6/download

[Ivytalk]

Feh, Analjelly. Russians. I want Russians.

[SDHornet]

Feh, Analjelly. Russians. I want Russians.

Oh and

[Ibanez]

Any minute now.....

[kalm]

OH YEAH!

Any minute now.....

[Ivytalk]

Any minute now.....

I’m guessing MyPillow’s sales have plummeted. Foam rubber isn’t what it used to be.

[89Hen]

2 more Oath Keepers added to 18 person conspiracy case. One of them was in a leadership only group chat.

They're only an idea. They don't really exist.